The `ui_test` crate still uses 2021 as the default edition for running
rustc-like tests. This creates an unwelcome discrepancy between
`cargo dev lint` which uses Rust 2024 by default, and running UI tests
through `compile-test`.
There is a specific test that `unsafe fn` are not lint, and that
`unsafe` blocks are not lint either. Since in edition 2024 `unsafe`
blocks are required inside `unsafe fn` to do unsafe things, set up a
specific test for edition 2021.
In edition 2024, `unsafe` blocks must be used inside `unsafe fn` to do
unsafe things. The `misnamed_getters` would not lint if the getter
expression was embedded inside an `unsafe` block.
By default, edition 2024 will capture all types and lifetimes present in
the function signature when using RPIT, while edition 2021 will capture
only the lifetimes present in the RPIT itself. Adding explicit `use<>`
markers will disable the edition-specific automatic rules when they
differ.
`assert_eq!()` and `assert_ne!()` are not expanded the same way as
`assert!()` (they use a `match` instead of a `if`). This makes them
being recognized as well.
Fixrust-lang/rust-clippy#14255
changelog: [`missing_asserts_for_indexing`]: consider `assert_eq!()` as
well
The methods `Take::get_mut` and `Chain::get_mut` include comments
warning about modifying the I/O state of the underlying reader. However,
many readers (e.g. `File`) allow I/O using a shared reference (e.g.
`&File`). So, add the same caveat to the `get_ref` methods.
To avoid crashing Clippy, the `bug!()` is used only when debug assertions are
enabled. In regular usage, the result will be the same as before, but without
the extra line printed on the standard output which has the potential for
disrupting shell scripts.
Reject test executables when not supported by target
Currently, compiling tests for SOLID produces an ICE, because SOLID does not support executables.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138047
Namely, use a more sensical primary span.
Don't pretty-print AST nodes for the diagnostic message. Why:
* It's lossy (e.g., it doesn't replicate trailing `+`s in trait objects.
* It's prone to leak error nodes (printed as `(/*ERROR*/)`) since
the LHS can easily represent recovered code (e.g., `fn(i32?) + T`).
