It bugs me when variables of type `Ident` are called `name`. It leads to
silly things like `name.name`. `Ident` variables should be called
`ident`, and `name` should be used for variables of type `Symbol`.
This commit improves things by by doing `s/name/ident/` on a bunch of
`Ident` variables. Not all of them, but a decent chunk.
It bugs me when variables of type `Ident` are called `name`. It leads to
silly things like `name.name`. `Ident` variables should be called
`ident`, and `name` should be used for variables of type `Symbol`.
This commit improves things by by doing `s/name/ident/` on a bunch of
`Ident` variables. Not all of them, but a decent chunk.
It bugs me when variables of type `Ident` are called `name`. It leads to
silly things like `name.name`. `Ident` variables should be called
`ident`, and `name` should be used for variables of type `Symbol`.
This commit improves things by by doing `s/name/ident/` on a bunch of
`Ident` variables. Not all of them, but a decent chunk.
Inspired by some of the communication issues around the stabilization of
`let`-chains, give more fine-grained information about the status of
updating style for any new syntax.
This does not change the process or blockers in any way; it only
*documents* the current state in the tracking issue. For instance, in
the case of `let`-chains, we would have checked the boxes for "Style
team decision" and "(non-blocking) Formatting has been implemented", and
not checked the box for the style guide. That would have then provided
better supporting information for any decisions.
report call site of inlined scopes for large assignment lints
Addressed issue: #121672
Tracking issue: #83518
r? `@oli-obk`
I tried to follow your comment about what to do [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121672#issuecomment-1972783675). However, I'm totally unfamiliar with the code so far (this is my first contribution touching compiler code), so I apologize in advance if I did something stupid 😅
In particular, I'm not sure I use the _correct_ source scope to look for inline data, as there is a whole `IndexVec` of them. My changes definitely did something, as can be seen by the added ui test. However, the result is not as anticipated in the issue:
```
LL | let cell = std::cell::UnsafeCell::new(data);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ value moved from here
```
instead of
```
LL | let cell = std::cell::UnsafeCell::new(data);
| ^^^^ value moved from here
```
raising my suspicion that maybe I got the wrong source scope.
Update `u8`-to-and-from-`i8` suggestions.
`u8::cast_signed` and `i8::cast_unsigned` have been stabilised, but `i8::from_ne_bytes` et al. still suggest using `as i8` or `as u8`.
Report higher-ranked trait error when higher-ranked projection goal fails in new solver
~~See HACK comment inline. Not actually sure if it should be marked as a *HACK*, b/c~~ it's kinda a legitimate case we want to care about unless we're going to make the proof tree visitor *smarter* about the leak check than the actual trait solver itself.
Encountered this while battling with `NiceRegionError`s in the old solver b/c I wondered what this code ended up giving us in the *new* solver as a comparison:
```rust
trait Foo {}
impl<T: FnOnce(&())> Foo for T {}
fn baz<T: Foo>() {}
fn main() {
baz::<fn(&'static ())>();
}
```
On master it's pretty bad:
```
error[E0271]: type mismatch resolving `<fn(&()) as FnOnce<(&(),)>>::Output == ()`
--> <source>:8:11
|
8 | baz::<fn(&'static ())>();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ types differ
|
note: required for `fn(&'static ())` to implement `Foo`
--> <source>:3:22
|
3 | impl<T: FnOnce(&())> Foo for T {}
| ----------- ^^^ ^
| |
| unsatisfied trait bound introduced here
```
After this PR it's much better:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `fn(&'static ()): Foo` is not satisfied
--> /home/mgx/test.rs:8:11
|
8 | baz::<fn(&'static ())>();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `for<'a> FnOnce(&'a ())` is not implemented for `fn(&'static ())`
|
= note: expected a closure with arguments `(&'static (),)`
found a closure with arguments `(&(),)`
note: required for `fn(&'static ())` to implement `Foo`
--> /home/mgx/test.rs:3:22
|
3 | impl<T: FnOnce(&())> Foo for T {}
| ----------- ^^^ ^
| |
| unsatisfied trait bound introduced here
note: required by a bound in `baz`
--> /home/mgx/test.rs:5:11
|
5 | fn baz<T: Foo>() {}
| ^^^ required by this bound in `baz`
```
r? lcnr
compiletest: Add directive `dont-require-annotations`
for making matching on specific diagnostic kinds non-exhaustive.
E.g. `//@ dont-require-annotations:ERROR`, like in the examples in this PR.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/139427#issuecomment-2782827583Closes#132647 FYI `@BoxyUwU` since you've wanted this.
r? `@jieyouxu`
speed up `String::push` and `String::insert`
Addresses the concerns described in #116235.
The performance gain comes mainly from avoiding temporary buffers.
Complex pattern matching in `encode_utf8` (introduced in #67569) has been simplified to a comparison and an exhaustive `match` in the `encode_utf8_raw_unchecked` helper function. It takes a slice of `MaybeUninit<u8>` because otherwise we'd have to construct a normal slice to uninitialized data, which is not desirable, I guess.
Several functions still have that [unneeded zeroing](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/5oKfMPo7j), but a single instruction is not that important, I guess.
`@rustbot` label T-libs C-optimization A-str
We should enable these to avoid misinterpreting uses of the extended
syntax as code blocks. This happens in practice with multi-paragraph
footnotes, as discovered in #139064.
`non_canonical_partial_ord_impl` will now recognize two forms of
canonical implementations: `Some(self.cmp(other))` and
`self.cmp(other).into()`.
changelog: [`non_canonical_partial_ord_impl`]: recognize
`self.cmp(other).into()` as a canonical implementation of
`PartialOrd::partial_cmp()`.
Fixesrust-lang/rust-clippy#13640
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #138869 (Try not to use verbatim paths in `Command::current_dir`)
- #138993 (Make `cfg_match!` a semitransparent macro)
- #139099 (Promise `array::from_fn` is generated in order of increasing indices)
- #139364 (Make the compiler suggest actual paths instead of visible paths if the visible paths are through any doc hidden path.)
- #139468 (Don't call `Span::with_parent` on the good path in `has_stashed_diagnostic`)
- #139481 (Add job summary links to post-merge report)
- #139573 (Miri subtree update)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Once writing the LSDA, it will need access to the Module to get a
reference to the personality function and to define a data object for
the LSDA.
Part of rust-lang/rustc_codegen_cranelift#1567
