Apply ABI attributes on return types in `rustc_codegen_cranelift`
- The [x86-64 System V ABI standard](https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/-/jobs/artifacts/master/raw/x86-64-ABI/abi.pdf?job=build) doesn't sign/zero-extend integer arguments or return types.
- But the de-facto standard as implemented by Clang and GCC is to sign/zero-extend arguments to 32 bits (but not return types).
- Additionally, Apple targets [sign/zero-extend both arguments and return values to 32 bits](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/writing-64-bit-intel-code-for-apple-platforms#Pass-arguments-to-functions-correctly).
- However, the `rustc_target` ABI adjustment code currently [unconditionally extends both arguments and return values to 32 bits](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blame/e703dff8fe220b78195c53478e83fb2f68d8499c/compiler/rustc_target/src/callconv/x86_64.rs#L240) on all targets.
- This doesn't cause a miscompilation when compiling with LLVM as LLVM will ignore the `signext`/`zeroext` attribute when applied to return types on non-Apple x86-64 targets.
- Cranelift, however, does not have a similar special case, requiring `rustc` to set the argument extension attribute correctly.
- However, `rustc_codegen_cranelift` doesn't currently apply ABI attributes to return types at all, meaning `rustc_codegen_cranelift` will currently miscompile `i8`/`u8`/`i16`/`u16` returns on x86-64 Apple targets as those targets require sign/zero-extension of return types.
This PR fixes the bug(s) by making the `rustc_target` x86-64 System V ABI only mark return types as sign/zero-extended on Apple platforms, while also making `rustc_codegen_cranelift` apply ABI attributes to return types. The RISC-V and s390x C ABIs also require sign/zero extension of return types, so this will fix those targets when building with `rustc_codegen_cranelift` too.
r? `````@bjorn3`````
Apply ABI attributes on return types in `rustc_codegen_cranelift`
- The [x86-64 System V ABI standard](https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/-/jobs/artifacts/master/raw/x86-64-ABI/abi.pdf?job=build) doesn't sign/zero-extend integer arguments or return types.
- But the de-facto standard as implemented by Clang and GCC is to sign/zero-extend arguments to 32 bits (but not return types).
- Additionally, Apple targets [sign/zero-extend both arguments and return values to 32 bits](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/writing-64-bit-intel-code-for-apple-platforms#Pass-arguments-to-functions-correctly).
- However, the `rustc_target` ABI adjustment code currently [unconditionally extends both arguments and return values to 32 bits](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blame/e703dff8fe220b78195c53478e83fb2f68d8499c/compiler/rustc_target/src/callconv/x86_64.rs#L240) on all targets.
- This doesn't cause a miscompilation when compiling with LLVM as LLVM will ignore the `signext`/`zeroext` attribute when applied to return types on non-Apple x86-64 targets.
- Cranelift, however, does not have a similar special case, requiring `rustc` to set the argument extension attribute correctly.
- However, `rustc_codegen_cranelift` doesn't currently apply ABI attributes to return types at all, meaning `rustc_codegen_cranelift` will currently miscompile `i8`/`u8`/`i16`/`u16` returns on x86-64 Apple targets as those targets require sign/zero-extension of return types.
This PR fixes the bug(s) by making the `rustc_target` x86-64 System V ABI only mark return types as sign/zero-extended on Apple platforms, while also making `rustc_codegen_cranelift` apply ABI attributes to return types. The RISC-V and s390x C ABIs also require sign/zero extension of return types, so this will fix those targets when building with `rustc_codegen_cranelift` too.
r? `````@bjorn3`````
Report never type lints in dependencies
This PR marks never type lints (`never_type_fallback_flowing_into_unsafe` & `dependency_on_unit_never_type_fallback`) to be included in cargo's reports / to be emitted when they happen in dependencies.
This PR is based on rust-lang/rust#141936
r? oli-obk
Reduce precedence of expressions that have an outer attr
Previously, `-Zunpretty=expanded` would expand this program as follows:
```rust
#![feature(stmt_expr_attributes)]
macro_rules! repro {
($e:expr) => {
#[allow(deprecated)] $e
};
}
#[derive(Default)]
struct Thing {
#[deprecated]
field: i32,
}
fn main() {
let thing = Thing::default();
let _ = repro!(thing).field;
}
```
```rs
#![feature(prelude_import)]
#![feature(stmt_expr_attributes)]
#[prelude_import]
use std::prelude::rust_2021::*;
#[macro_use]
extern crate std;
struct Thing {
#[deprecated]
field: i32,
}
#[automatically_derived]
impl ::core::default::Default for Thing {
#[inline]
fn default() -> Thing {
Thing { field: ::core::default::Default::default() }
}
}
fn main() {
let thing = Thing::default();
let _ = #[allow(deprecated)] thing.field;
}
```
This is not the correct expansion. The correct output would have `(#[allow(deprecated)] thing).field` with the attribute applying only to `thing`, not to `thing.field`.
Move metadata object generation for dylibs to the linker code
This deduplicates some code between codegen backends and may in the future allow adding extra metadata that is only known at link time.
Prerequisite of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96708.
Move metadata object generation for dylibs to the linker code
This deduplicates some code between codegen backends and may in the future allow adding extra metadata that is only known at link time.
Prerequisite of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96708.
Move metadata object generation for dylibs to the linker code
This deduplicates some code between codegen backends and may in the future allow adding extra metadata that is only known at link time.
Prerequisite of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96708.
Reduce precedence of expressions that have an outer attr
Previously, `-Zunpretty=expanded` would expand this program as follows:
```rust
#![feature(stmt_expr_attributes)]
macro_rules! repro {
($e:expr) => {
#[allow(deprecated)] $e
};
}
#[derive(Default)]
struct Thing {
#[deprecated]
field: i32,
}
fn main() {
let thing = Thing::default();
let _ = repro!(thing).field;
}
```
```rs
#![feature(prelude_import)]
#![feature(stmt_expr_attributes)]
#[prelude_import]
use std::prelude::rust_2021::*;
#[macro_use]
extern crate std;
struct Thing {
#[deprecated]
field: i32,
}
#[automatically_derived]
impl ::core::default::Default for Thing {
#[inline]
fn default() -> Thing {
Thing { field: ::core::default::Default::default() }
}
}
fn main() {
let thing = Thing::default();
let _ = #[allow(deprecated)] thing.field;
}
```
This is not the correct expansion. The correct output would have `(#[allow(deprecated)] thing).field` with the attribute applying only to `thing`, not to `thing.field`.
use `MixedBitSet` for borrows-in-scope dataflow analysis
The `Borrows` dataflow analysis uses a dense bitset, but a bitset supporting _some_ amount of sparseness is better suited for big functions with a big number of loans.
The cutoff between dense and chunked bitset is around 2K loans IIRC, and we could finesse that value if we wanted to, but as-is it happens to a couple of rustc-perf benchmarks (which IIRC are at least partially generated from macros and the likes.). It's a small win on these two, and shouldn't have any impact on the others.
r? `@matthewjasper`
No need to call into fold when the first item is already None,
this avoids some redundant work for empty iterators.
"But it uses Fuse" one might want to protest, but Fuse is specialized
and may call into the inner iterator anyway.
