The current "This is supported" wording implies that it's possible to
still use the item on other configurations, but in an unsupported way.
Changing this to "Available" removes this ambiguity.
Hide cross-crate `#[doc(hidden)]` associated items in trait impls
Fixes#95717.
r? ```@GuillaumeGomez```
This is the bug I ran into in #95316.
```@rustbot``` label T-rustdoc A-cross-crate-reexports
Bump bootstrap compiler to 1.61.0 beta
This PR bumps the bootstrap compiler to the 1.61.0 beta. The first commit changes the stage0 compiler, the second commit applies the "mechanical" changes and the third and fourth commits apply changes explained in the relevant comments.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Fix intra doc link ICE when trying to get traits in scope for primitive
Fixes#95633.
I think ``@notriddle`` was the one who worked on this part of the code last so:
r? ``@notriddle``
rustdoc: Fix resolution of `crate`-relative paths in doc links
Resolve `crate::foo` paths transparently to rustdoc, so their resolution no longer affects diagnostics and modules used for determining traits in scope.
The proper solution is to account for the current `module_id`/`parent_scope` in `fn resolve_crate_root`, but it's a slightly larger compiler changes. This PR moves the code closer to it, but keeps it rustdoc-specific.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/78696
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94924
Handle rustc_const_stable attribute in library feature collector
The library feature collector in [compiler/rustc_passes/src/lib_features.rs](551b4fa395/compiler/rustc_passes/src/lib_features.rs) has only been looking at `#[stable(…)]`, `#[unstable(…)]`, and `#[rustc_const_unstable(…)]` attributes, while ignoring `#[rustc_const_stable(…)]`. The consequences of this were:
- When any const feature got stabilized (changing one or more `rustc_const_unstable` to `rustc_const_stable`), users who had previously enabled that unstable feature using `#![feature(…)]` would get told "unknown feature", rather than rustc's nicer "the feature … has been stable since … and no longer requires an attribute to enable".
This can be seen in the way that https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93957#issuecomment-1079794660 failed after rebase:
```console
error[E0635]: unknown feature `const_ptr_offset`
--> $DIR/offset_from_ub.rs:1:35
|
LL | #![feature(const_ptr_offset_from, const_ptr_offset)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
- We weren't enforcing that a particular feature is either stable everywhere or unstable everywhere, and that a feature that has been stabilized has the same stabilization version everywhere, both of which we enforce for the other stability attributes.
This PR updates the library feature collector to handle `rustc_const_stable`, and fixes places in the standard library and test suite where `rustc_const_stable` was being used in a way that does not meet the rules for a stability attribute.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #95032 (Clean up, categorize and sort unstable features in std.)
- #95260 (Better suggestions for `Fn`-family trait selection errors)
- #95293 (suggest wrapping single-expr blocks in square brackets)
- #95344 (Make `impl Debug for rustdoc::clean::Item` easier to read)
- #95388 (interpret: make isize::MAX the limit for dynamic value sizes)
- #95530 (rustdoc: do not show primitives and keywords as private)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rustdoc: add 🔒 to items with restricted visibility
This change marks items with restricted visibility with 🔒 when building with `--document-private-items`:
<img width="278" alt="Screen Shot 2022-03-20 at 23 50 24" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/509209/159189513-9e4b09bb-6785-41a5-bfe2-df02f83f8641.png">
There also appears a “Restricted Visibility” tooltip when hovering over the emoji.
---
The original PR for reference:
This change makes private items slightly transparent (similar to `unstable` items in rustc):
<img width="272" alt="Screen Shot 2022-03-16 at 22 17 43" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/509209/158692627-a1f6f5ec-e043-4aa2-9352-8d2b15c31c08.png">
I found myself using `--document-private-items` a lot recently because I find the documentation of private internals quite helpful when working on a larger project. However, not being able to distinguish private from public items (see #87785) when looking at the documentation makes this somewhat cumbersome.
This PR addresses the third suggestion of issue #87785 by marking private items typographically. It seems to me that the other suggestions are more involved but this is at least a first step.
A private item is also made slightly transparent in the path displayed in the header of a page:
<img width="467" alt="Screen Shot 2022-03-16 at 22 19 51" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/509209/158692885-0bbd3417-3c0b-486f-b8ab-99c05c6fa7ca.png">
I am looking forward to feedback and suggestions.
Unify impl blocks by wrapping them into a div
The blanket and "auto traits" sections are wrapped into a `div` with an ID. This PR fixes this incoherence by wrapping each impl section (the "deref impl" and the "inherent impl" sections were missing it). It'll also make some tests simpler to write.
r? `````@notriddle`````
Improve rustdoc const bounds
- Rustdoc no longer displays `~const` in trait bounds, because it currently means nothing for stable users, and because we still haven't decided on the final syntax yet.
- Rustdoc will hide trait bounds where the trait is `Drop` AND it is `~const`, i.e. `~const Drop` bounds because it has no effect on stable users as well.
- Because of additional logic that hides the whole `where` statement where it consists of `~const Drop` bounds (so it doesn't display `struct Foo<T>() where ;` like that), bounds that have no trait e.g. `where [T; N+1]: ;` are also hidden.
Cherry-picked from #92433.
rustdoc: Stop textually replacing `Self` in doc links before resolving them
Resolve it directly to a type / def-id instead.
Also never pass `Self` to `Resolver`, it is useless because it's guaranteed that no resolution will be found.
This is a pre-requisite for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83761.
Support GATs in Rustdoc
Implements:
1. Rendering GATs in trait definitions and impl blocks
2. Rendering GATs in types (e.g. in the return type of a function)
Fixes#92341
This is my first rustdoc PR, so I have absolutely no idea how to produce tests for this. Advice from the rustdoc team would be wonderful!
I tested locally and things looked correct:
rustdoc: Add test for higher kinded functions generated by macros
Fixes#75564.
The problem has been solved apparently so adding a test to prevent a regression.
r? ```@notriddle```
Fix duplicated impl links
Fixes#78701.
The problem is that the blanket impl has the same ID as the other impl, except that we don't derive IDs when we generate the sidebar. We now do.
r? ``@notriddle``
