Include missing tools in the manifest and mark them as unavailable
This PR changes the `build-manifest` tool to always include the missing components in the manifest, marking them as `available = false`. This blocks rustup from updating to a different nightly if the component is installed.
The code builds and _should_ be correct, but I don't know a way to test the changes locally.
r? @alexcrichton
cc @kennytm https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/rustup.rs/issues/1486
This commit adds a normalization for line and column numbers in stderr
files where the line/col is from the source directory rather than
the test itself - thereby removing the need to update tests as
compiler source changes.
update lld submodule to include RISCV patch
This pulls in one new commit, to add support for linking static RISCV
binaries, suitable for the new riscv32imac-unknown-none-elf target.
See: https://github.com/rust-lang/lld/pull/1
Change target triple used to check for lldb in build-manifest
The wrong target triple was used for lldb in build-manifest. lldb is
only built for macOS, so update the triple to reflect that.
This is an attempt to fix bug#48168.
This pulls in one new commit, to add support for linking static RISCV
binaries, suitable for the new riscv32imac-unknown-none-elf target.
See: https://github.com/rust-lang/lld/pull/1
debug_assert to ensure that from_raw_parts is only used properly aligned
This does not help nearly as much as I would hope because everybody uses the distributed libstd which is compiled without debug assertions. For this reason, I am not sure if this is even worth it. OTOH, this would have caught the misalignment fixed by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/42789 *if* there had been any tests actually using ZSTs with alignment >1 (we have a CI runner which has debug assertions in libstd enabled), and it seems to currently [fail in the rg testsuite](https://ci.appveyor.com/project/rust-lang/rust/build/1.0.8403/job/v7dfdcgn8ay5j6sb). So maybe it is worth it, after all.
I have seen the attribute `#[rustc_inherit_overflow_checks]` in some places, does that make it so that the *caller's* debug status is relevant? Is there a similar attribute for `debug_assert!`? That could even subsume `rustc_inherit_overflow_checks`: Something like `rustc_inherit_debug_flag` could affect *all* places that change the generated code depending on whether we are in debug or release mode. In fact, given that we have to keep around the MIR for generic functions anyway, is there ever a reason *not* to handle the debug flag that way? I guess currently we apply debug flags like `cfg` so this is dropped early during the MIR pipeline?
EDIT: I learned from @eddyb that because of how `debug_assert!` works, this is not realistic. Well, we could still have it for the rustc CI runs and then maybe, eventually, when libstd gets compiled client-side and there is both a debug and a release build... then this will also benefit users.^^
The wrong target triple was used for lldb in build-manifest. lldb is
only built for macOS, so update the triple to reflect that.
This is an attempt to fix bug#48168.
Tidy: ignore non-Markdown files when linting for the Unstable Book
Previously, any file would be assumed a `.md`, which is annoying when files like `.DS_STORE` slip in and then cause tidy errors.
This optionally adds lldb (and clang, which it needs) to the build.
Because rust uses LLVM 7, and because clang 7 is not yet released, a
recent git master version of clang is used.
The lldb that is used includes the Rust plugin.
lldb is only built when asked for, or when doing a nightly build on
macOS. Only macOS is done for now due to difficulties with the Python
dependency.
Make sure rlimit is only ever increased
`libc::setrlimit` will fail if we try to set the rlimit to a value lower than it is currently, so make sure we're never trying to do this. Fixes#52801.
Previously, even if no expected errors were supplied, if a test execution failed
then supplied error patterns would not be checked. This commit modifies the
conditional that determines whether error patterns or expected errors are checked
to remedy this.
Further, this commit modifies the error pattern checking logic so that each pattern
is checked against all lines of the string. This is required for UI tests as the
stderr is in JSON format - all on one line - so in the previous implementation when the
first pattern was found on the first line (which was actually the entire error) then
no other patterns would be found on subsequent lines (as there weren't any).
Add errors for unknown, stable and duplicate feature attributes
- Adds an error for unknown (lang and lib) features.
- Extends the lint for unnecessary feature attributes for stable features to libs features (this already exists for lang features).
- Adds an error for duplicate (lang and lib) features.
```rust
#![feature(fake_feature)] //~ ERROR unknown feature `fake_feature`
#![feature(i128_type)] //~ WARNING the feature `i128_type` has been stable since 1.26.0
#![feature(non_exhaustive)]
#![feature(non_exhaustive)] //~ ERROR duplicate `non_exhaustive` feature attribute
```
Fixes#52053, fixes#53032 and address some of the problems noted in #44232 (though not unused features).
There are a few outstanding problems, that I haven't narrowed down yet:
- [x] Stability attributes on macros do not seem to be taken into account.
- [x] Stability attributes behind `cfg` attributes are not taken into account.
- [x] There are failing incremental tests.
