Revert: create const block bodies in typeck via query feeding
as per the discussion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/125806#discussion_r1622563948
It was a mistake to try to shoehorn const blocks and some specific anon consts into the same box and feed them during typeck. It turned out not simplifying anything (my hope was that we could feed `type_of` to start avoiding the huge HIR matcher, but that didn't work out), but instead making a few things more fragile.
reverts the const-block-specific parts of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/124650
`@bors` rollup=never had a small perf impact previously
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125846
r? `@compiler-errors`
Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions
This implements the suggestion in [#15701](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15701#issuecomment-2033124217) to disallow ambiguous outer attributes on expressions. This should resolve one of the concerns blocking the stabilization of `stmt_expr_attributes`.
Note that the caller chooses a type for type param
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/return-impl-trait.rs:23:5
|
LL | fn other_bounds<T>() -> T
| - -
| | |
| | expected `T` because of return type
| | help: consider using an impl return type: `impl Trait`
| expected this type parameter
...
LL | ()
| ^^ expected type parameter `T`, found `()`
|
= note: expected type parameter `T`
found unit type `()`
= note: the caller chooses the type of T which can be different from ()
```
Tried to see if "expected this type parameter" can be replaced, but that goes all the way to `rustc_infer` so seems not worth the effort and can affect other diagnostics.
Revives #112088 and #104755.
Several (doc) comments were super outdated or didn't provide enough context.
Some doc comments shoved everything in a single paragraph without respecting
the fact that the first paragraph should be a single sentence because rustdoc
treats these as item descriptions / synopses on module pages.
Count stashed errors again
Stashed diagnostics are such a pain. Their "might be emitted, might not" semantics messes with lots of things.
#120828 and #121206 made some big changes to how they work, improving some things, but still leaving some problems, as seen by the issues caused by #121206. This PR aims to fix all of them by restricting them in a way that eliminates the "might be emitted, might not" semantics while still allowing 98% of their benefit. Details in the individual commit logs.
r? `@oli-obk`
Stashed errors used to be counted as errors, but could then be
cancelled, leading to `ErrorGuaranteed` soundness holes. #120828 changed
that, closing the soundness hole. But it introduced other difficulties
because you sometimes have to account for pending stashed errors when
making decisions about whether errors have occured/will occur and it's
easy to overlook these.
This commit aims for a middle ground.
- Stashed errors (not warnings) are counted immediately as emitted
errors, avoiding the possibility of forgetting to consider them.
- The ability to cancel (or downgrade) stashed errors is eliminated, by
disallowing the use of `steal_diagnostic` with errors, and introducing
the more restrictive methods `try_steal_{modify,replace}_and_emit_err`
that can be used instead.
Other things:
- `DiagnosticBuilder::stash` and `DiagCtxt::stash_diagnostic` now both
return `Option<ErrorGuaranteed>`, which enables the removal of two
`delayed_bug` calls and one `Ty::new_error_with_message` call. This is
possible because we store error guarantees in
`DiagCtxt::stashed_diagnostics`.
- Storing the guarantees also saves us having to maintain a counter.
- Calls to the `stashed_err_count` method are no longer necessary
alongside calls to `has_errors`, which is a nice simplification, and
eliminates two more `span_delayed_bug` calls and one FIXME comment.
- Tests are added for three of the four fixed PRs mentioned below.
- `issue-121108.rs`'s output improved slightly, omitting a non-useful
error message.
Fixes#121451.
Fixes#121477.
Fixes#121504.
Fixes#121508.
Always evaluate free constants and statics, even if previous errors occurred
work towards https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79738
We will need to evaluate static items before the `definitions.freeze()` below, as we will start creating new `DefId`s (for nested allocations) within the `eval_static_initializer` query.
But even without that motivation, this is a good change. Hard errors should always be reported and not silenced if other errors happened earlier.
When encountering a verbose/multipart suggestion that has changes
that are only caused by different capitalization of ASCII letters that have
little differenciation, expand the message to highlight that fact (like we
already do for inline suggestions).
The logic to do this was already present, but implemented incorrectly.
make matching on NaN a hard error, and remove the rest of illegal_floating_point_literal_pattern
These arms would never be hit anyway, so the pattern makes little sense. We have had a future-compat lint against float matches in general for a *long* time, so I hope we can get away with immediately making this a hard error.
This is part of implementing https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3535.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/41620 by removing the lint.
https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1456 updates the reference to match.
`Diagnostic::keys`, which is used for hashing and equating diagnostics,
has a surprising behaviour: it ignores children, but only for lints.
This was added in #88493 to fix some duplicated diagnostics, but it
doesn't seem necessary any more.
This commit removes the special case and only four tests have changed
output, with additional errors. And those additional errors aren't
exact duplicates, they're just similar. For example, in
src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/same_name_method.rs we currently have this
error:
```
error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait
--> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13
|
LL | fn foo() {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: existing `foo` defined here
--> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:79:9
|
LL | impl T1 for S {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
and with this change we also get this error:
```
error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait
--> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13
|
LL | fn foo() {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: existing `foo` defined here
--> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:81:9
|
LL | impl T2 for S {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
I think printing this second argument is reasonable, possibly even
preferable to hiding it. And the other cases are similar.
