Fix target name in NetBSD platform-support doc
NetBSD platform-support doc currently mentions `amd64-unknown-netbsd`, but it is not a valid target name (the correct name is `x86_64-unknown-netbsd`).
ceab6128fa/src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support/netbsd.md (L16)
```console
$ rustc --print target-list | grep netbsd
aarch64-unknown-netbsd
aarch64_be-unknown-netbsd
armv6-unknown-netbsd-eabihf
armv7-unknown-netbsd-eabihf
i586-unknown-netbsd
i686-unknown-netbsd
mipsel-unknown-netbsd
powerpc-unknown-netbsd
riscv64gc-unknown-netbsd
sparc64-unknown-netbsd
x86_64-unknown-netbsd
```
Add section to sanitizer doc for `-Zexternal-clangrt`
After spending a week looking for answers to how to do the very thing this flag lets me do, it felt appropriate to document it where I would've expected it to be.
After spending a week looking for answers to how to do the very thing
this flag lets me do, it felt appropriate to document it where I would've
expected it to be.
Note impact of `-Cstrip` on backtraces
It is not always clear to people what the impact of `-Cstrip` options are. They are a common question on sites like StackOverflow, and sometimes people even report bugs with "no backtrace" after deliberately mangling the symbol table. We cannot exhaustively document every permutation, but we should warn people about common effects.
It is not always clear to people what the impact of `-Cstrip` options are.
They are a common question on sites like StackOverflow, and sometimes
people even report bugs with "no backtrace" after deliberately mangling
the symbol table. We cannot exhaustively document every permutation, but
we should warn people about common effects.
Experimental feature postfix match
This has a basic experimental implementation for the RFC postfix match (rust-lang/rfcs#3295, #121618). [Liaison is](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Postfix.20Match.20Liaison/near/423301844) ```@scottmcm``` with the lang team's [experimental feature gate process](https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/blob/master/src/how_to/experiment.md).
This feature has had an RFC for a while, and there has been discussion on it for a while. It would probably be valuable to see it out in the field rather than continue discussing it. This feature also allows to see how popular postfix expressions like this are for the postfix macros RFC, as those will take more time to implement.
It is entirely implemented in the parser, so it should be relatively easy to remove if needed.
This PR is split in to 5 commits to ease review.
1. The implementation of the feature & gating.
2. Add a MatchKind field, fix uses, fix pretty.
3. Basic rustfmt impl, as rustfmt crashes upon seeing this syntax without a fix.
4. Add new MatchSource to HIR for Clippy & other HIR consumers
`f16` and `f128` step 3: compiler support & feature gate
Continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121841, another portion of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114607
This PR exposes the new types to the world and adds a feature gate. Marking this as a draft because I need some feedback on where I did the feature gate check. It also does not yet catch type via suffixed literals (so the feature gate test will fail, probably some others too because I haven't belssed).
If there is a better place to check all types after resolution, I can do that. If not, I figure maybe I can add a second gate location in AST when it checks numeric suffixes.
Unfortunately I still don't think there is much testing to be done for correctness (codegen tests or parsed value checks) until we have basic library support. I think that will be the next step.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116909
r? `@compiler-errors`
cc `@Nilstrieb`
`@rustbot` label +F-f16_and_f128
coverage: Initial support for branch coverage instrumentation
(This is a review-ready version of the changes that were drafted in #118305.)
This PR adds support for branch coverage instrumentation, gated behind the unstable flag value `-Zcoverage-options=branch`. (Coverage instrumentation must also be enabled with `-Cinstrument-coverage`.)
During THIR-to-MIR lowering (MIR building), if branch coverage is enabled, we collect additional information about branch conditions and their corresponding then/else blocks. We inject special marker statements into those blocks, so that the `InstrumentCoverage` MIR pass can reliably identify them even after the initially-built MIR has been simplified and renumbered.
The rest of the changes are mostly just plumbing needed to gather up the information that was collected during MIR building, and include it in the coverage metadata that we embed in the final binary.
Note that `llvm-cov show` doesn't print branch coverage information in its source views by default; that needs to be explicitly enabled with `--show-branches=count` or similar.
---
The current implementation doesn't have any support for instrumenting `if let` or let-chains. I think it's still useful without that, and adding it would be non-trivial, so I'm happy to leave that for future work.
Includes related tests and documentation pages.
Michael Goulet: Don't issue feature error in resolver for f16/f128
unless finalize
Co-authored-by: Michael Goulet <michael@errs.io>
rustdoc-search: search types by higher-order functions
This feature extends rustdoc with syntax and search index information for searching function pointers and closures (Higher-Order Functions, or HOF). Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60485
This PR adds two syntaxes: a high-level one for finding any kind of HOF, and a direct implementation of the parenthesized path syntax that Rust itself uses.
## Preview pages
| Query | Results |
|-------|---------|
| [`option<T>, (fnonce (T) -> bool) -> option<T>`][optionfilter] | `Option::filter` |
| [`option<T>, (T -> bool) -> option<T>`][optionfilter2] | `Option::filter` |
Updated chapter of the book: https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/rustdoc/read-documentation/search.html
[optionfilter]: https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/std/vec/struct.Vec.html?search=option<T>%2C+(fnonce+(T)+->+bool)+->+option<T>&filter-crate=std
[optionfilter2]: https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/std/vec/struct.Vec.html?search=option<T>%2C+(T+->+bool)+->+option<T>&filter-crate=std
## Motivation
When type-based search was first landed, it was directly [described as incomplete][a comment].
[a comment]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/23289#issuecomment-79437386
Filling out the missing functionality is going to mean adding support for more of Rust's [type expression] syntax, such as references, raw pointers, function pointers, and closures. This PR adds function pointers and closures.
[type expression]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/types.html#type-expressions
There's been demand for something "like Hoogle, but for Rust" expressed a few times [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/y8sbid/is_there_a_website_like_haskells_hoogle_for_rust/) [2](https://users.rust-lang.org/t/rust-equivalent-of-haskells-hoogle/102280) [3](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/std-library-inclusion-policy/6852/2) [4](https://discord.com/channels/442252698964721669/448238009733742612/1109502307495858216). Some of them just don't realize what functionality already exists ([`Duration -> u64`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/?search=duration%20-%3E%20u64) already works), but a lot of them specifically want to search for higher-order functions like option combinators.
## Guide-level explanation (from the Rustdoc book)
To search for a function that accepts a function as a parameter, like `Iterator::all`, wrap the nested signature in parenthesis, as in [`Iterator<T>, (T -> bool) -> bool`][iterator-all]. You can also search for a specific closure trait, such as `Iterator<T>, (FnMut(T) -> bool) -> bool`, but you need to know which one you want.
[iterator-all]: https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/std/vec/struct.Vec.html?search=Iterator<T>%2C+(T+->+bool)+->+bool&filter-crate=std
## Reference-level description (also from the Rustdoc book)
### Primitives with Special Syntax
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Shorthand</th>
<th>Explicit names</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr><td colspan="2">Before this PR</td></tr>
<tr>
<td><code>[]</code></td>
<td><code>primitive:slice</code> and/or <code>primitive:array</code></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><code>[T]</code></td>
<td><code>primitive:slice<T></code> and/or <code>primitive:array<T></code></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><code>!</code></td>
<td><code>primitive:never</code></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><code>()</code></td>
<td><code>primitive:unit</code> and/or <code>primitive:tuple</code></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><code>(T)</code></td>
<td><code>T</code></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><code>(T,)</code></td>
<td><code>primitive:tuple<T></code></td>
</tr>
<tr><td colspan="2">After this PR</td></tr>
<tr>
<td><code>(T, U -> V, W)</code></td>
<td><code>fn(T, U) -> (V, W)</code>, Fn, FnMut, and FnOnce</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
The `->` operator has lower precedence than comma. If it's not wrapped in brackets, it delimits the return value for the function being searched for. To search for functions that take functions as parameters, use parenthesis.
### Search query grammar
```ebnf
ident = *(ALPHA / DIGIT / "_")
path = ident *(DOUBLE-COLON ident) [BANG]
slice-like = OPEN-SQUARE-BRACKET [ nonempty-arg-list ] CLOSE-SQUARE-BRACKET
tuple-like = OPEN-PAREN [ nonempty-arg-list ] CLOSE-PAREN
arg = [type-filter *WS COLON *WS] (path [generics] / slice-like / tuple-like)
type-sep = COMMA/WS *(COMMA/WS)
nonempty-arg-list = *(type-sep) arg *(type-sep arg) *(type-sep) [ return-args ]
generic-arg-list = *(type-sep) arg [ EQUAL arg ] *(type-sep arg [ EQUAL arg ]) *(type-sep)
normal-generics = OPEN-ANGLE-BRACKET [ generic-arg-list ] *(type-sep)
CLOSE-ANGLE-BRACKET
fn-like-generics = OPEN-PAREN [ nonempty-arg-list ] CLOSE-PAREN [ RETURN-ARROW arg ]
generics = normal-generics / fn-like-generics
return-args = RETURN-ARROW *(type-sep) nonempty-arg-list
exact-search = [type-filter *WS COLON] [ RETURN-ARROW ] *WS QUOTE ident QUOTE [ generics ]
type-search = [ nonempty-arg-list ]
query = *WS (exact-search / type-search) *WS
; unchanged parts of the grammar, like the full list of type filters, are omitted
```
## Future direction
### The remaining type expression grammar
As described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/118194, this is another step in the type expression grammar: BareFunction, and the function-like mode of TypePath, are now supported.
* RawPointerType and ReferenceType actually are a priority.
* ImplTraitType and TraitObjectType (and ImplTraitTypeOneBound and TraitObjectTypeOneBound) aren't as much of a priority, since they desugar pretty easily.
### Search subtyping and traits
This is the other major factor that makes it less useful than it should be.
* `iterator<result<t>> -> result<t>` doesn't find `Result::from_iter`. You have to search [`intoiterator<result<t>> -> result<t>`](https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/std/vec/struct.Vec.html?search=intoiterator%3Cresult%3Ct%3E%3E%20-%3E%20result%3Ct%3E&filter-crate=std). Nobody's going to search for IntoIterator unless they basically already know about it and don't need the search engine anyway.
* Iterator combinators are usually structs that happen to implement Iterator, like `std::iter::Map`.
To solve these cases, it needs to look at trait implementations, knowing that Iterator is a "subtype of" IntoIterator, and Map is a "subtype of" Iterator, so `iterator -> result` is a subtype of `intoiterator -> result` and `iterator<t>, (t -> u) -> iterator<u>` is a subtype of [`iterator<t>, (t -> u) -> map<t -> u>`](https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/std/vec/struct.Vec.html?search=iterator%3Ct%3E%2C%20(t%20-%3E%20u)%20-%3E%20map%3Ct%20-%3E%20u%3E&filter-crate=std).
coverage: Remove or migrate all unstable values of `-Cinstrument-coverage`
(This PR was substantially overhauled from its original version, which migrated all of the existing unstable values intact.)
This PR takes the three nightly-only values that are currently accepted by `-Cinstrument-coverage`, completely removes two of them (`except-unused-functions` and `except-unused-generics`), and migrates the third (`branch`) over to a newly-introduced unstable flag `-Zcoverage-options`.
I have a few motivations for wanting to do this:
- It's unclear whether anyone actually uses the `except-unused-*` values, so this serves as an opportunity to either remove them, or prompt existing users to object to their removal.
- After #117199, the stable values of `-Cinstrument-coverage` treat it as a boolean-valued flag, so having nightly-only extra values feels out-of-place.
- Nightly-only values also require extra ad-hoc code to make sure they aren't accidentally exposed to stable users.
- The new system allows multiple different settings to be toggled independently, which isn't possible in the current single-value system.
- The new system makes it easier to introduce new behaviour behind an unstable toggle, and then gather nightly-user feedback before possibly making it the default behaviour for all users.
- The new system also gives us a convenient place to put relatively-narrow options that won't ever be the default, but that nightly users might still want access to.
- It's likely that we will eventually want to give stable users more fine-grained control over coverage instrumentation. The new flag serves as a prototype of what that stable UI might eventually look like.
The `branch` option is a placeholder that currently does nothing. It will be used by #122322 to opt into branch coverage instrumentation.
---
I see `-Zcoverage-options` as something that will exist more-or-less indefinitely, though individual sub-options might come and go as appropriate. I think there will always be some demand for nightly-only toggles, so I don't see `-Zcoverage-options` itself ever being stable, though we might eventually stabilize something similar to it.
This new nightly-only flag can be used to toggle fine-grained flags that
control the details of coverage instrumentation.
Currently the only supported flag value is `branch` (or `no-branch`), which is
a placeholder for upcoming support for branch coverage. Other flag values can
be added in the future, to prototype proposed new behaviour, or to enable
special non-default behaviour.
Rename `wasm32-wasi-preview1-threads` to `wasm32-wasip1-threads`
This commit renames the current `wasm32-wasi-preview1-threads` target to `wasm32-wasip1-threads`. The need for this rename is a bit unfortunate as the previous name was chosen in an attempt to be future-compatible with other WASI targets. Originally this target was proposed to be `wasm32-wasi-threads`, and that's what was originally implemented in wasi-sdk as well. After discussion though and with the plans for the upcoming component-model target (now named `wasm32-wasip2`) the "preview1" naming was chosen for the threads-based target. The WASI subgroup later decided that it was time to drop the "preview" terminology and recommends "pX" instead, hence previous PRs to add `wasm32-wasip2` and rename `wasm32-wasi` to `wasm32-wasip1`.
So, with all that history, the "proper name" for this target is different than its current name, so one way or another a rename is required. This PR proposes renaming this target cold-turkey, unlike `wasm32-wasi` which is having a long transition period to change its name. The threads-based target is predicted to see only a fraction of the traffic of `wasm32-wasi` due to the unstable nature of the WASI threads proposal itself.
While I was here I updated the in-tree documentation in the target spec file itself as most of the documentation was copied from the original WASI target and wasn't as applicable to this target.
Also, as an aside, I can at least try to apologize for all the naming confusion here, but this is hopefully the last WASI-related rename.
This is implemented, in addition to the ML-style one,
because Rust does it. If we don't, we'll never hear the end of it.
This commit also refactors some duplicate parts of the parser
into a dedicated function.
Option::map, for example, looks like this:
option<t>, (t -> u) -> option<u>
This syntax searches all of the HOFs in Rust: traits Fn, FnOnce,
and FnMut, and bare fn primitives.
This commit renames the current `wasm32-wasi-preview1-threads` target to
`wasm32-wasip1-threads`. The need for this rename is a bit unfortunate
as the previous name was chosen in an attempt to be future-compatible
with other WASI targets. Originally this target was proposed to be
`wasm32-wasi-threads`, and that's what was originally implemented in
wasi-sdk as well. After discussion though and with the plans for the
upcoming component-model target (now named `wasm32-wasip2`) the
"preview1" naming was chosen for the threads-based target. The WASI
subgroup later decided that it was time to drop the "preview"
terminology and recommends "pX" instead, hence previous PRs to add
`wasm32-wasip2` and rename `wasm32-wasi` to `wasm32-wasip1`.
So, with all that history, the "proper name" for this target is
different than its current name, so one way or another a rename is
required. This PR proposes renaming this target cold-turkey, unlike
`wasm32-wasi` which is having a long transition period to change its
name. The threads-based target is predicted to see only a fraction of
the traffic of `wasm32-wasi` due to the unstable nature of the WASI
threads proposal itself.
While I was here I updated the in-tree documentation in the target spec
file itself as most of the documentation was copied from the original
WASI target and wasn't as applicable to this target.
Also, as an aside, I can at least try to apologize for all the naming
confusion here, but this is hopefully the last WASI-related rename.
