Remove `#[const_trait]`
Remove `#[const_trait]` since we now have `const trait`. Update all structured diagnostics that still suggested the attribute.
r? ```@rust-lang/project-const-traits```
Encode cfg trace, not its early counterpart to fix cross-crate `doc(auto_cfg)`
Fixesrust-lang/rust#141301.
<details><summary>Rambling about <code>target_feature</code> which I didn't touch here</summary>
Regarding https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/141301#issuecomment-3390100259 (`#[target_feature(enable = …)]` on inlined cross-crate re-exports), it has the same underlying cause (namely, we neither encode `target_feature` nor `AttributeKind::TargetFeature` in the crate metadata). However, I didn't make that change because I first want to experiment with querying `TyCtxt::codegen_fn_attrs` in rustdoc instead which already works cross-crate (and also use to it for reconstructing `no_mangle`, `export_name`, `link_section` to avoid encoding these attributes unnecessarily (basically reverting rust-lang/rust#144050) as suggested in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/144004#issuecomment-3077725837).
</details>
r? GuillaumeGomez
mgca: Add ConstArg representation for const items
tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#132980fixesrust-lang/rust#131046fixesrust-lang/rust#134641
As part of implementing `min_generic_const_args`, we need to distinguish const items that can be used in the type system, such as in associated const equality projections, from const items containing arbitrary const code, which must be kept out of the type system. Specifically, all "type consts" must be either concrete (no generics) or generic with a trivial expression like `N` or a path to another type const item.
To syntactically distinguish these cases, we require, for now at least, that users annotate all type consts with the `#[type_const]` attribute. Then, we validate that the const's right-hand side is indeed eligible to be a type const and represent it differently in the HIR.
We accomplish this representation using a new `ConstItemRhs` enum in the HIR, and a similar but simpler enum in the AST. When `#[type_const]` is **not** applied to a const (e.g. on stable), we represent const item right-hand sides (rhs's) as HIR bodies, like before. However, when the attribute is applied, we instead lower to a `hir::ConstArg`. This syntactically distinguishes between trivial const args (paths) and arbitrary expressions, which are represented using `AnonConst`s. Then in `generics_of`, we can take advantage of the existing machinery to bar the `AnonConst` rhs's from using parent generics.
Fix invalid tag closing when leaving expansion "original code"
Fixesrust-lang/rust#148184.
Problem was that in case an element inside the expansion's "original" element was not closed, this element would get its `pending_exit` field set to `true`, removing it when the next non-mergeable item gets pushed instead of being put inside it, and then next `exit_elem` would try to exit an empty class queue.
r? ```@notriddle```
Reorganize rustdoc tests into their correct subdirectories for better
categorization:
- Move lint-related tests to rustdoc-ui/lints/
- Move intra-doc link tests to rustdoc-ui/intra-doc/
- Move deref-related tests to rustdoc-ui/deref/
- Move doc-cfg test to rustdoc/doc-cfg/
This improves test organization and makes it easier to find tests
related to specific rustdoc functionality.
rustdoc: hide `#[repr]` if it isn't part of the public ABI
> [!IMPORTANT]
> Temporarily stacked on top of PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/146527; only the last commit is relevant!
Follow-up to rust-lang/rust#115439.
Unblocks rust-lang/rust#116743, CC ``@dtolnay.``
Fixesrust-lang/rust#66401.
Fixesrust-lang/rust#128364.
Fixesrust-lang/rust#137440.
Only display the representation `#[repr(REPR)]` (where `REPR` is not `Rust` or `transparent`) of a given type if none of its variants (incl. the synthetic variants of structs) are `#[doc(hidden)]` and all of its fields are public and not `#[doc(hidden)]` since it's likely not meant to be considered part of the public ABI otherwise.
`--document-{private,hidden}-items` works as expected in this context, too.
Moreover, we now also factor in the presence of `#[doc(hidden)]` when checking whether to show `repr(transparent)` or not.
Sanitizers target modificators
Depends on bool flag fix: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138483.
Some sanitizers need to be target modifiers, and some do not. For now, we should mark all sanitizers as target modifiers except for these: AddressSanitizer, LeakSanitizer
For kCFI, the helper flag -Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers should also be a target modifier.
Many test errors was with sanizer flags inconsistent with std deps. Tests are fixed with `-C unsafe-allow-abi-mismatch`.
Multiple references to a single footnote is a part of GitHub Flavored
Markdown syntax (although not explicitly documented as well as regular
footnotes, it is implemented in GitHub's fork of CommonMark) and not
prohibited by rustdoc.
cf. <587a12bb54/test/extensions.txt (L762-L780)>
However, using it makes multiple "sup" elements with the same "id"
attribute, which is invalid per the HTML specification.
Still, not only this is a valid GitHub Flavored Markdown syntax, this is
helpful on certain cases and actually tested (accidentally) in
tests/rustdoc/footnote-reference-in-footnote-def.rs.
This commit keeps track of the number of references per footnote and gives
unique ID to each reference. It also emits *all* back links from a footnote
to its references as "↩" (return symbol) plus a numeric list in superscript.
As a known limitation, it assumes that all references to a footnote are
rendered (this is not always true if a dangling footnote has one or more
references but considered a reasonable compromise).
Also note that, this commit is designed so that no HTML changes will occur
unless multiple references to a single footnote is actually used.
[rustdoc] Display unsafe attrs with edition 2024 `unsafe()` wrappers.
Use Rust 2024 edition representation for unsafe attributes in rustdoc HTML:
- `#[no_mangle]` -> `#[unsafe(no_mangle)]`
- `#[export_name = "foo"]` -> `#[unsafe(export_name = "foo")]`
- `#[link_section = ".text"]` -> `#[unsafe(link_section = ".text")]`
The 2024 edition representation is used regardless of the crate's own edition. This ensures that Rustaceans don't have to learn the rules of an outdated edition (e.g. that `unsafe()` wasn't always necessary) in order to understand a crate's documentation.
After some looking through the `T-rustdoc` issues, I was not able to find an existing issue for this. Apologies if I missed it.
r? ``````@aDotInTheVoid``````
