Thanks to marcusklaas' hard work in https://github.com/raphlinus/pulldown-cmark/pull/469, this fixes a lot of rustdoc bugs!
- Get rid of unnecessary `RefCell`
- Fix duplicate warnings for broken implicit reference link
- Remove unnecessary copy of links
Previously, `resolve` would immediately check that `module_id` was
non-empty and give an error if not. This had two downsides:
- It introduced `Option`s everywhere, even if the calling function knew
it had a valid module, and
- It checked the module on each namespace, which is unnecessary: it only
needed to be checked once.
This makes the caller responsible for checking the module exists, making
the code a lot simpler.
Use `is_unstable_const_fn` instead of `is_min_const_fn` in rustdoc where appropriate
This closes#76501. Specifically, it allows for nightly users with the `#![feature(const_fn)]` flag enabled to still have their `const fn` declarations documented as such, while retaining the desired behavior that rustdoc *not* document functions that have the `rustc_const_unstable` attribute as `const`.
Improve suggestions for broken intra-doc links
~~Depends on #74489 and should not be merged before that PR.~~ Merged 🎉
~~Depends on #75916 and should not be merged before.~~ Merged
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/75305.
This does a lot of different things 😆.
- Add `PerNS::into_iter()` so I didn't have to keep rewriting hacks around it. Also add `PerNS::iter()` for consistency. Let me know if this should be `impl IntoIterator` instead.
- Make `ResolutionFailure` an enum instead of a unit variant. This was most of the changes: everywhere that said `ErrorKind::ResolutionFailure` now has to say _why_ the link failed to resolve.
- Store the resolution in case of an anchor failure. Previously this was implemented as variants on `AnchorFailure` which was prone to typos and had inconsistent output compared to the rest of the diagnostics.
- Turn some `Err`ors into unwrap() or panic()s, because they're rustdoc bugs and not user error. These have comments as to why they're bugs (in particular this would have caught #76073 as a bug a while ago).
- If an item is not in scope at all, say the first segment in the path that failed to resolve
- If an item exists but not in the current namespaces, say that and suggests linking to that namespace.
- If there is a partial resolution for an item (part of the segments resolved, but not all of them), say the partial resolution and why the following segment didn't resolve.
- Add the `DefId` of associated items to `kind_side_channel` so it can be used for diagnostics (tl;dr of the hack: the rest of rustdoc expects the id of the item, but for diagnostics we need the associated item).
- No longer suggests escaping the brackets for every link that failed to resolve; this was pretty obnoxious. Now it only suggests `\[ \]` if no segment resolved and there is no `::` in the link.
- Add `Suggestion`, which says _what_ to prefix the link with, not just 'prefix with the item kind'.
Places where this is currently buggy:
<details><summary>All outdated</summary>
~~1. When the link has the wrong namespace:~~ Now fixed.
<details>
```rust
/// [type@S::h]
impl S {
pub fn h() {}
}
/// [type@T::g]
pub trait T {
fn g() {}
}
```
```
error: unresolved link to `T::g`
--> /home/joshua/rustc/src/test/rustdoc-ui/intra-link-errors.rs:53:6
|
53 | /// [type@T::g]
| ^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: this link partially resolves to the trait `T`,
= note: `T` has no field, variant, or associated item named `g`
error: unresolved link to `S::h`
--> /home/joshua/rustc/src/test/rustdoc-ui/intra-link-errors.rs:48:6
|
48 | /// [type@S::h]
| ^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: this link partially resolves to the struct `S`,
= note: `S` has no field, variant, or associated item named `h`
```
Instead it should suggest changing the disambiguator, the way it currently does for macros:
```
error: unresolved link to `S`
--> /home/joshua/rustc/src/test/rustdoc-ui/intra-link-errors.rs:38:6
|
38 | /// [S!]
| ^^ help: to link to the unit struct, use its disambiguator: `value@S`
|
= note: this link resolves to the unit struct `S`, which is not in the macro namespace
```
</details>
2. ~~Associated items for values. It says that the value isn't in scope; instead it should say that values can't have associated items.~~ Fixed.
<details>
```
error: unresolved link to `f::A`
--> /home/joshua/rustc/src/test/rustdoc-ui/intra-link-errors.rs:14:6
|
14 | /// [f::A]
| ^^^^
|
= note: no item named `f` is in scope
= help: to escape `[` and `]` characters, add '\' before them like `\[` or `\]`
```
This is _mostly_ fixed, it now says
```rust
warning: unresolved link to `f::A`
--> /home/joshua/test-rustdoc/f.rs:1:6
|
1 | /// [f::A]
| ^^^^
|
= note: this link partially resolves to the function `f`
= note: `f` is a function, not a module
```
'function, not a module' seems awfully terse when what I actually mean is '`::` isn't allowed here', though.
</details>
It looks a lot nicer now, it says
```
error: unresolved link to `f::A`
--> /home/joshua/rustc/src/test/rustdoc-ui/intra-link-errors.rs:13:6
|
13 | /// [f::A]
| ^^^^
|
= note: `f` is a function, not a module or type, and cannot have associated items
```
3. ~~I'm also not very happy with the second note for this error:~~
<details>
```
error: unresolved link to `S::A`
--> /home/joshua/rustc/src/test/rustdoc-ui/intra-link-errors.rs:19:6
|
19 | /// [S::A]
| ^^^^
|
= note: this link partially resolves to the struct `S`,
= note: `S` has no field, variant, or associated item named `A`
```
but I'm not sure how better to word it.
I ended up going with 'no `A` in `S`' to match `rustc_resolve` but that seems terse as well.
</details>
This now says
```
error: unresolved link to `S::A`
--> /home/joshua/rustc/src/test/rustdoc-ui/intra-link-errors.rs:17:6
|
17 | /// [S::A]
| ^^^^
|
= note: the struct `S` has no field or associated item named `A`
```
which I think looks pretty good :)
4. This is minor, but it would be nice to say that `path` wasn't found instead of the full thing:
```
error: unresolved link to `path::to::nonexistent::module`
--> /home/joshua/rustc/src/test/rustdoc-ui/intra-link-errors.rs:8:6
|
8 | /// [path::to::nonexistent::module]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
It will now look at most 3 paths up (so it reports `path::to` as not in scope), but it doesn't work with arbitrarily many paths.
</details>
~~I recommend only reviewing the last few commits - the first 7 are all from #74489.~~ Rebased so that only the relevant commits are shown. Let me know if I should squash the history some more.
r? `@estebank`
rustdoc: Fix font CSS for crate lists
I had put it in the wrong file in #76126. This should fix it now. Thank
you to `@ollie27` for pointing this out!
---
`@rustbot` modify labels: T-rustdoc C-bug
Previously, this called `check_full_res` for values and types, but not
macros. This would result in not showing when there was a partial
resolution for a parent of the item.
This now calls `check_full_res`. Additionally, it checks if there was a
disambiguator, and if so, says that specific kind wasn't found instead
of saying generically 'associated item'.
Before:
```
warning: unresolved link to `m`
--> m.rs:1:6
|
1 | /// [value@m]
| ^^^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(broken_intra_doc_links)]` on by default
= note: no item named `m` is in scope
= help: to escape `[` and `]` characters, add '\' before them like `\[` or `\]`
```
After:
```
warning: unresolved link to `m`
--> m.rs:1:6
|
1 | /// [value@m]
| ^^^^^^^ help: to link to the macro, use its disambiguator: `m!`
|
= note: `#[warn(broken_intra_doc_links)]` on by default
= note: this link resolves to the macro `m`, which is not in the value namespace
```
Previously, when looking for the associated items for primitives,
rustdoc would look for primitives in the current namespace.
But all primitives are in the type namespace. To fix this, rustdoc now
always looks for primitives in the namespace when considering them as a
stepping stone to the associated item.
However, fixing that bug caused several duplicate errors because rustdoc
now reports the same error in each namespace. To avoid this, rustdoc now
ignores all duplicate errors when issuing them.
Before:
```
= note: this link partially resolves to the struct `S`
= note: no `fmt` in `S`
```
After:
```
= note: the struct `S` has no field or associated item named `fmt`
```
Look at this beauty:
```rust
error: unresolved link to `S::h`
--> intra-link-errors.rs:51:6
|
51 | /// [type@S::h]
| ^^^^^^^^^ help: to link to the associated function, use its disambiguator: `S::h()`
|
= note: this link resolves to the associated function `h`, which is not in the type namespace
```
Fix intra-doc links on pub re-exports
Partial fix for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76073 - This removes the incorrect error, but doesn't show the documentation anywhere.
r? @GuillaumeGomez
Remove disambiguators from intra doc link text
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65354.
r? @Manishearth
The commits are mostly atomic, but there might be some mix between them here and there. I recommend reading 'refactor ItemLink' and 'refactor RenderedLink' on their own though, lots of churn without any logic changes.
