When trying to do a binary operation with missing implementation, for
example `1 + Some(2)`, provide an explicit help message:
```
note: no implementation for `{integer} + std::option::Option<{integer}>`
```
Use `rustc_on_unimplemented` for the suggestions. Move cfail test to ui.
When making a forwarding wrapper we must in general forward all methods,
so that we use the type's own `lt` for example instead of the default.
Example important case: f32's partial_cmp does several operations but
its lt is a primitive.
Added core::cmp::Reverse for sort_by_key reverse sorting
I'm not sure if this is the best way to go about proposing this feature but it's pretty useful. It allows you to use `sort_by_key` and return tuples where a single item is then reversed to how it normally sorts.
I quite miss something like this in Rust currently though I'm not sure if this is the best way to implement it.
@jongiddy noticed bad performance due to the lack of inlining on `then`
and `then_with`. I confirmed that inlining really is the culprit by
creating a custom `then` function and repeating his benchmark on my
machine with and without the `#[inline]` attribute.
The numbers were exactly the same on my machine without the attribute.
With `#[inline]` I got the same performance as I did with manually
inlined implementation.
This commit updates the version number to 1.17.0 as we're not on that version of
the nightly compiler, and at the same time this updates src/stage0.txt to
bootstrap from freshly minted beta compiler and beta Cargo.
This commit introduces 128-bit integers. Stage 2 builds and produces a working compiler which
understands and supports 128-bit integers throughout.
The general strategy used is to have rustc_i128 module which provides aliases for iu128, equal to
iu64 in stage9 and iu128 later. Since nowhere in rustc we rely on large numbers being supported,
this strategy is good enough to get past the first bootstrap stages to end up with a fully working
128-bit capable compiler.
In order for this strategy to work, number of locations had to be changed to use associated
max_value/min_value instead of MAX/MIN constants as well as the min_value (or was it max_value?)
had to be changed to use xor instead of shift so both 64-bit and 128-bit based consteval works
(former not necessarily producing the right results in stage1).
This commit includes manual merge conflict resolution changes from a rebase by @est31.
Removes the `STATUSES` static which duplicates truth from the pattern
match in `collect_lang_features`.
Fixes existing duplicates by renaming:
- never_type{,_impls} on `impl`s on `!`
- concat_idents{,_macro} on `macro_rules! concat_idents`
Fixes#37013.
I think these just got out of sync, but both use a lexicographic
ordering.
Relevant commits in the history of these explanations:
* 8b81f76 on 2015-06-30
* e22770b on 2016-02-09
