mention lint group in default level lint note
### Summary
This PR updates lint diagnostics so that default-level notes now mention the lint group they belong to, if any.
Fixes: rust-lang/rust#65464.
### Example
```rust
fn main() {
let x = 5;
}
```
Before:
```
= note: `#[warn(unused_variables)]` on by default
```
After:
```
= note: `#[warn(unused_variables)]` (part of `#[warn(unused)]`) on by default
```
### Unchanged Cases
Messages remain the same when the lint level is explicitly set, e.g.:
* Attribute on the lint `#[warn(unused_variables)]`:
```
note: the lint level is defined here
LL | #[warn(unused_variables)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
* Attribute on the group `#[warn(unused)]:`:
```
= note: `#[warn(unused_variables)]` implied by `#[warn(unused)]`
```
* CLI option `-W unused`:
```
= note: `-W unused-variables` implied by `-W unused`
= help: to override `-W unused` add `#[allow(unused_variables)]`
```
* CLI option `-W unused-variables`:
```
= note: requested on the command line with `-W unused-variables`
```
fix: re-enable self-assignment
## Description
Re-enables the self-assignment detection that was previously disabled due to unrelated regressions. The fix detects useless assignments like `x = x` and `foo.field = foo.field`.
## History
The original regressions (rust-lang/rust#81626, rust-lang/rust#81658) were specifically about false positives in write-only field detection, not self-assignment detection. Belows are brief history for the rule that I understand.
- Self-assignment detection was originally implemented in rust-lang/rust#87129 to address rust-lang/rust#75356
- The implementation was disabled alongside the revert of rust-lang/rust#81473's "write-only fields" detection
- rust-lang/rust#81473 was reverted via rust-lang/rust#86212 and rust-lang/rust#83171 due to false positives in write-only field detection (rust-lang/rust#81626, rust-lang/rust#81658)
- The self-assignment detection feature got removed, even though it wasn't the reason for the problems
This PR only re-enables the self-assignment checks, which are orthogonal to the problematic write-only field analysis.
## Changes
- Removed `#[allow(dead_code)]` from `compiler/rustc_passes/src/dead.rs` file
- `handle_assign` and
- `check_for_self_assign`
- Added `ExprKind::Assign` handling in `visit_expr` to call both methods
- Updated test expectations in `tests/ui/lint/dead-code/self-assign.rs`
Modify `AttributeTemplate` to support list of alternatives for list and name value attribute styles.
Suggestions now provide more correct suggested code:
```
error[E0805]: malformed `used` attribute input
--> $DIR/used_with_multi_args.rs:3:1
|
LL | #[used(compiler, linker)]
| ^^^^^^------------------^
| |
| expected a single argument here
|
help: try changing it to one of the following valid forms of the attribute
|
LL - #[used(compiler, linker)]
LL + #[used(compiler)]
|
LL - #[used(compiler, linker)]
LL + #[used(linker)]
|
LL - #[used(compiler, linker)]
LL + #[used]
|
```
instead of the prior "masking" of the lack of this feature by suggesting pipe-separated lists:
```
error[E0805]: malformed `used` attribute input
--> $DIR/used_with_multi_args.rs:3:1
|
LL | #[used(compiler, linker)]
| ^^^^^^------------------^
| |
| expected a single argument here
|
help: try changing it to one of the following valid forms of the attribute
|
LL - #[used(compiler, linker)]
LL + #[used(compiler|linker)]
|
LL - #[used(compiler, linker)]
LL + #[used]
|
```
Rehome 32 `tests/ui/issues/` tests to other subdirectories under `tests/ui/`
rust-lang/rust#143902 divided into smaller, easier to review chunks.
Part of rust-lang/rust#133895
Methodology:
1. Refer to the previously written `tests/ui/SUMMARY.md`
2. Find an appropriate category for the test, using the original issue thread and the test contents.
3. Add the issue URL at the bottom (not at the top, as that would mess up stderr line numbers)
4. Rename the tests to make their purpose clearer
Inspired by the methodology that `@Kivooeo` was using.
r? `@jieyouxu`
Upgrade semicolon_in_expressions_from_macros from warn to deny
This is already warn-by-default, and a future compatibility warning (FCW) that warns in dependencies. Upgrade it to deny-by-default, as the next step towards hard error.
Per https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79813#issuecomment-3109105631
Add lint against dangling pointers from local variables
## `dangling_pointers_from_locals`
*warn-by-default*
The `dangling_pointers_from_locals` lint detects getting a pointer to data of a local that will be dropped at the end of the function.
### Example
```rust
fn f() -> *const u8 {
let x = 0;
&x // returns a dangling ptr to `x`
}
```
```text
warning: a dangling pointer will be produced because the local variable `x` will be dropped
--> $DIR/dangling-pointers-from-locals.rs:10:5
|
LL | fn simple() -> *const u8 {
| --------- return type of the function is `*const u8`
LL | let x = 0;
| - `x` is defined inside the function and will be drop at the end of the function
LL | &x
| ^^
|
= note: pointers do not have a lifetime; after returning, the `u8` will be deallocated at the end of the function because nothing is referencing it as far as the type system is concerned
= note: `#[warn(dangling_pointers_from_locals)]` on by default
```
### Explanation
Returning a pointer from a local value will not prolong its lifetime, which means that the value can be dropped and the allocation freed while the pointer still exists, making the pointer dangling.
If you need stronger guarantees, consider using references instead, as they are statically verified by the borrow-checker to never dangle.
------
This is related to GitHub codeql [CWE-825](https://github.com/github/codeql/blob/main/rust/ql/src/queries/security/CWE-825/AccessAfterLifetimeBad.rs) which shows examples of such simple miss-use.
It should be noted that C compilers warns against such patterns even without `-Wall`, https://godbolt.org/z/P7z98arrc.
------
`@rustbot` labels +I-lang-nominated +T-lang
cc `@traviscross`
r? compiler
Extend `is_case_difference` to handle digit-letter confusables
This PR extends `is_case_difference` to handle digit-letter confusables
Add support for detecting 0/O, 1/l, 5/S, 8/B, 9/g confusables in error suggestions.
r? `@estebank`
expand: Micro-optimize prelude injection
Use `splice` to avoid shifting the other items twice.
Put `extern crate std;` first so it's already resolved when we resolve `::std::prelude::rust_20XX`.
Adds the equivalent `nonpoison` types to the `poison::mutex` module.
These types and implementations are gated under the `nonpoison_mutex`
feature gate.
Also blesses the ui tests that now have a name conflicts (because these
types no longer have unique names). The full path distinguishes the
different types.
Co-authored-by: Aandreba <aandreba@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu>
Use `splice` to avoid shifting the other items twice.
Put `extern crate std;` first so it's already resolved when we resolve `::std::prelude::rust_20XX`.
`tests/ui/issues/`: The Issues Strike Back [1/N]
I believe I’ve finally brought [my program](https://github.com/Kivooeo/test-manager) to life -- it now handles multiple test moves in one go: plain moves first, then a gentle touch on each file depends on given options. The process should be much smoother now.
Of course, I won’t rush through everything in a few days -- that would be unkind to `@Oneirical.` I’ll pace myself. And also I can't have more than one such PR because `issues.txt` will conflict with previous parts after merging them which is not fun as well.
This PR is just that: first commit - moves; second - regression comments and the occasional .stderr reblesses, also issue.txt and tidy changes. Nothing special, but progress nonetheless. This is for the purpose of preserving test file history during restructuring
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133895.
r? `@jieyouxu`
Fix unused_parens false positive
Resolvesrust-lang/rust#143653.
The "no bounds exception" was indiscriminately set to `OneBound` for referents and pointees. However, if the reference or pointer type itself appears in no-bounds position, any constraints it has must be propagated.
```rust
// unused parens: not in no-bounds position
fn foo(_: Box<(dyn Send)>) {}
// unused parens: in no-bounds position, but one-bound exception applies
fn bar(_: Box<dyn Fn(&u32) -> &(dyn Send)>) {}
// *NOT* unused parens: in no-bounds position, but no exceptions to be made
fn baz(_: Box<dyn Fn(&u32) -> &(dyn Send) + Send>) {}
```
don't link to the nightly version of the Edition Guide in stable lints
As reported in rust-lang/rust#143557 for `rust_2024_incompatible_pat`, most future-Edition-incompatibility lints link to the nightly version of the Edition Guide; the lints were written before their respective Editions (and their guides) stabilized. But now that Rusts 2021 and 2024 are stable, these lints are emitted on stable versions of the compiler, where it makes more sense to present users with links that don't say "nightly" in them.
This does not change the link for `rust_2024_incompatible_pat`. That's handled in rust-lang/rust#144006.
This is already warn-by-default, and a future compatibility warning
(FCW) that warns in dependencies. Upgrade it to deny-by-default, as the
next step towards hard error.
According to
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-volatile-access-to-non-dereferenceable-memory-may-be-well-defined/86303/4,
LLVM allows volatile operations on null and handles it correctly. This
should be allowed in Rust as well, because I/O memory may be hard-coded
to address 0 in some cases, like the AVR chip ATtiny1626.
A test case that ensured a failure when passing null to volatile was
removed, since it's now valid.
Due to the addition of `maybe_is_aligned` to `ub_checks`,
`maybe_is_aligned_and_not_null` was refactored to use it.
docs: revise restrictions on volatile operations
A distinction between usage on Rust memory vs. non-Rust memory was
introduced. Documentation was reworded to explain what that means, and
make explicit that:
- No trapping can occur from volatile operations;
- On Rust memory, all safety rules must be respected;
- On Rust memory, the primary difference from regular access is that
volatile always involves a memory dereference;
- On Rust memory, the only data affected by an operation is the one
pointed to in the argument(s) of the function;
- On Rust memory, provenance follows the same rules as non-volatile
access;
- On non-Rust memory, any address known to not contain Rust memory is
valid (including 0 and usize::MAX);
- On non-Rust memory, no Rust memory may be affected (it is implicit
that any other non-Rust memory may be affected, though, even if not
referenced by the pointer). This should be relevant when, for example,
reading register A causes a flag to change in register B, or writing
to A causes B to change in some way. Everything affected mustn't be
inside an allocation.
- On non-Rust memory, provenance is irrelevant and a pointer with none
can be used in a valid way.
fix: don't lint null as UB for volatile
Also remove a now-unneeded `allow` line.
fix: additional wording nits
Split-up stability_index query
This PR aims to move deprecation and stability processing away from the monolithic `stability_index` query, and directly implement `lookup_{deprecation,stability,body_stability,const_stability}` queries.
The basic idea is to:
- move per-attribute sanity checks into `check_attr.rs`;
- move attribute compatibility checks into the `MissingStabilityAnnotations` visitor;
- progressively dismantle the `Annotator` visitor and the `stability_index` query.
The first commit contains functional change, and now warns when `#[automatically_derived]` is applied on a non-trait impl block. The other commits should not change visible behaviour.
Perf in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/143845#issuecomment-3066308630 shows small but consistent improvement, except for unused-warnings case. That case being a stress test, I'm leaning towards accepting the regression.
This PR changes `check_attr`, so has a high conflict rate on that file. This should not cause issues for review.
Retire hir::*ItemRef.
This information was kept for various places that iterate on HIR to know about trait-items and impl-items.
This PR replaces them by uses of the `associated_items` query that contain pretty much the same information.
This shortens many spans to just `def_span`, which can be easier to read.
Check assoc consts and tys later like assoc fns
This PR
1. checks assoc consts and tys later like assoc fns
2. marks assoc consts appear in poly-trait-ref live
For assoc consts, considering
```rust
#![deny(dead_code)]
trait Tr { // ERROR trait `Tr` is never used
const I: Self;
}
struct Foo; //~ ERROR struct `Foo` is never constructed
impl Tr for Foo {
const I: Self = Foo;
}
fn main() {}
```
Current this will produce unused `I` instead of unused `Tr` and `Foo` ([play](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2024&gist=e0490d4a2d522cb70437b26e514a3d9c)), because `const I: Self = Foo;` will be added into the worklist at first:
```
error: associated constant `I` is never used
--> src/main.rs:4:11
|
3 | trait Tr { // ERROR trait `Tr` is never used
| -- associated constant in this trait
4 | const I: Self;
| ^
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> src/main.rs:1:9
|
1 | #![deny(dead_code)]
| ^^^^^^^^^
error: could not compile `playground` (bin "playground") due to 1 previous error
```
This also happens to assoc tys, see the [new test](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...mu001999-contrib:rust:dead-code/impl-items?expand=1#diff-bf45fa403934a31c9d610a073ed2603d885e7e81572e8edf38b7f4e08a1f3531)
Fixesrust-lang/rust#126729
r? `````@petrochenkov`````
chore: Improve how the other suggestions message gets rendered
Note: This change is part of my ongoing work to use `annotate-snippets` as `rustc`'s emitter
This change started as a way to remove some specialty code paths from `annotate-snippets`, by making the "and {} other candidates" message get rendered like a secondary message with no level, but turned into a fix for the message's Unicode output. Before this change, when using the Unicode output, the other suggestions message would get rendered outside of the main suggestion block, making it feel disconnected from what it was referring to. This change makes it so that the message is on the last line of the block, aligning its rendering with other secondary messages, and making it clear what the message is referring to.
Before:
```
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of undeclared type `IntoIter`
╭▸ $DIR/issue-82956.rs:28:24
│
LL │ let mut iter = IntoIter::new(self);
│ ━━━━━━━━ use of undeclared type `IntoIter`
╰╴
help: consider importing one of these structs
╭╴
LL + use std::array::IntoIter;
├╴
LL + use std::collections::binary_heap::IntoIter;
├╴
LL + use std::collections::btree_map::IntoIter;
├╴
LL + use std::collections::btree_set::IntoIter;
╰╴
and 9 other candidates
```
After:
```
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of undeclared type `IntoIter`
╭▸ $DIR/issue-82956.rs:28:24
│
LL │ let mut iter = IntoIter::new(self);
│ ━━━━━━━━ use of undeclared type `IntoIter`
╰╴
help: consider importing one of these structs
╭╴
LL + use std::array::IntoIter;
├╴
LL + use std::collections::binary_heap::IntoIter;
├╴
LL + use std::collections::btree_map::IntoIter;
├╴
LL + use std::collections::btree_set::IntoIter;
│
╰ and 9 other candidates
```
