UI tests: add missing diagnostic kinds where possible
The subset of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/139427 that only adds diagnostic kinds to line annotations, without changing any other things in annotations or compiletest.
After this only non-viral `NOTE`s and `HELP`s should be missing.
r? `@jieyouxu`
Fix stack overflow in exhaustiveness due to recursive HIR opaque hidden types
This fixes several spicy non-trivial recursive opaque definitions inferred from HIR typeck, ensuring that they don't cause stack overflows in exhaustiveness code, which currently reveals opaques manually in a way that is not overflow aware (as opposed to something like the normalizer folders).
These should eventually be outright rejected, but today (some) non-trivial recursive opaque definitions are accepted, and changing that requires an FCP, so for now just make sure we don't stack overflow :^)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/139402
r? lcnr
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #136458 (Do not deduplicate list of associated types provided by dyn principal)
- #136474 ([`compiletest`-related cleanups 3/7] Make the distinction between sources root vs test suite sources root in compiletest less confusing)
- #136592 (Make sure we don't overrun the stack in canonicalizer)
- #136787 (Remove `lifetime_capture_rules_2024` feature)
- #137207 (Add #[track_caller] to Duration Div impl)
- #137245 (Tweak E0277 when predicate comes indirectly from ?)
- #137257 (Ignore fake borrows for packed field check)
- #137399 (fix ICE in layout computation with unnormalizable const)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Change description from compiletest to regression test
Co-authored-by: 许杰友 Jieyou Xu (Joe) <39484203+jieyouxu@users.noreply.github.com>
Improve test name, location, and description
Update tests/ui/impl-trait/impl-fn-rpit-opaque-107883.rs
Co-authored-by: waffle <waffle.lapkin@gmail.com>
```
error[E0610]: `{integer}` is a primitive type and therefore doesn't have fields
--> $DIR/attempted-access-non-fatal.rs:7:15
|
LL | let _ = 2.l;
| ^
|
help: if intended to be a floating point literal, consider adding a `0` after the period and a `f64` suffix
|
LL - let _ = 2.l;
LL + let _ = 2.0f64;
|
```
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135179 (Make sure to use `Receiver` trait when extracting object method candidate)
- #136554 (Add `opt_alias_variances` and use it in outlives code)
- #136556 ([AIX] Update tests/ui/wait-forked-but-failed-child.rs to accomodate exiting and idle processes.)
- #136589 (Enable "jump to def" feature on rustc docs)
- #136615 (sys: net: Add UEFI stubs)
- #136635 (Remove outdated `base_port` calculation in std net test)
- #136682 (Move two windows process tests to tests/ui)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add `opt_alias_variances` and use it in outlives code
...so to fix some subtle outlives bugs with precise capturing in traits, and eventually make it easier to compute variances for "forced unconstrained" trait lifetimes.
r? lcnr
Always compute coroutine layout for eagerly emitting recursive layout errors
Detect recursive coroutine layouts even if we don't detect opaque type recursion in the new solver. This is for two reasons:
1. It helps us detect (bad) recursive async function calls in the new solver, which due to its approach to normalization causes us to not detect this via a recursive RPIT (since the opaques are more eagerly revealed in the opaque body).
* Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/137.
2. It helps us detect (bad) recursive async functions behind AFITs. See the AFIT test that changed for the old solver too.
3. It also greatly simplifies the recursive impl trait check, since I can remove some jankness around how it handles coroutines.
Highlight clarifying information in "expected/found" error
When the expected and found types have the same textual representation, we add clarifying in parentheses. We now visually highlight it in the output.
Detect a corner case where the clarifying information would be the same for both types and skip it, as it doesn't add anything useful.
When the expected and found types have the same textual representation, we add clarifying in parentheses. We now visually highlight it in the output.
Detect a corner case where the clarifying information would be the same for both types and skip it, as it doesn't add anything useful.
Manually walk into WF obligations in `BestObligation` proof tree visitor
When we encounter a `WellFormed` obligation in the `BestObligation` proof tree visitor, ignore the proof tree and call `wf::unnormalized_obligations` to derive well-formed obligations with the correct cause codes. This is to avoid having to replicate the somewhat delicate logic that `wf.rs` does to set up its obligation causes... Don't see a better way to do this.
vibes?? r? lcnr
Compiler: Finalize dyn compatibility renaming
Update the Reference link to use the new URL fragment from https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1666 (this change has finally hit stable). Fixes a FIXME.
Follow-up to #130826.
Part of #130852.
~~Blocking it on #133372.~~ (merged)
r? ghost
