Don't store locals in generators that are immediately overwritten with the resume argument
This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69672 and makes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69033 pass the async fn size tests again (in other words, there will be no size regression of async fn if both this and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69033 land).
~~This is a small botch and I'd rather have a more precise analysis, but that seems much harder to pull off, so this special-cases `Yield` terminators that store the resume argument into a simple local (ie. without any field projections) and explicitly marks that local as "not live" in the suspend point of that yield. We know that this local does not need to be stored in the generator for this suspend point because the next resume would immediately overwrite it with the passed-in resume argument anyways. The local might still end up in the state if it is used across another yield.~~ (this now properly updates the dataflow framework to handle this case)
Optimize catch_unwind to match C++ try/catch
This refactors the implementation of catching unwinds to allow LLVM to inline the "try" closure directly into the happy path, avoiding indirection. This means that the catch_unwind implementation is (after this PR) zero-cost unless a panic is thrown.
https://rust.godbolt.org/z/cZcUSB is an example of the current codegen in a simple case. Notably, the codegen is *exactly the same* if `-Cpanic=abort` is passed, which is clearly not great.
This PR, on the other hand, generates the following assembly:
```asm
# -Cpanic=unwind:
push rbx
mov ebx,0x2a
call QWORD PTR [rip+0x1c53c] # <happy>
mov eax,ebx
pop rbx
ret
mov rdi,rax
call QWORD PTR [rip+0x1c537] # cleanup function call
call QWORD PTR [rip+0x1c539] # <unfortunate>
mov ebx,0xd
mov eax,ebx
pop rbx
ret
# -Cpanic=abort:
push rax
call QWORD PTR [rip+0x20a1] # <happy>
mov eax,0x2a
pop rcx
ret
```
Fixes#64224, and resolves#64222.
miri engine: fix treatment of abort intrinsic
I screwed up in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69830 and added `abort` to the wrong block of intrinsics, namely the one that actually has a return place. So that branch was never actually reached.
r? @oli-obk
Improve expression & attribute parsing
This PR includes misc improvements to expression and attribute parsing.
1. Some code simplifications
2. Better recovery for various block forms, e.g. `loop statements }` (missing `{` after `loop`). (See e.g., `block-no-opening-brace.rs` among others for examples.)
3. Added recovery for e.g., `unsafe $b` where `$b` refers to a `block` macro fragment. (See `bad-interpolated-block.rs` for examples.)
4. ^--- These are done so that code sharing in block parsing is increased.
5. Added recovery for e.g., `'label: loop { ... }` (See `labeled-no-colon-expr.rs`.)
6. Added recovery for e.g., `&'lifetime expr` (See `regions-out-of-scope-slice.rs`.)
7. Added recovery for e.g., `fn foo() = expr;` (See `fn-body-eq-expr-semi.rs`.)
8. Simplified attribute parsing code & slightly improved diagnostics.
9. Added recovery for e.g., `Box<('a) + Trait>`.
10. Added recovery for e.g, `if true #[attr] {} else #[attr] {} else #[attr] if true {}`.
r? @estebank
parse: Tweak the function parameter edition check
Follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69801.
Edition of a code fragment is inferred from "the place where the code is written".
For individual tokens like edition-specific keywords it may be the span of the token itself ("uninterpolated" span), but for larger code fragments it's probably not, in the test example the trait method is obviously written in "2015 edition code".
r? @Centril
Exhaustiveness checking, `Matrix::push`: recursively expand or-patterns
> There's an implicit invariant that there should be no or-patterns directly in the first column of the matrix, but this invariant is broken exactly when an or-pattern has a child that is itself an or-pattern.
Here we preserve this broken invariant by recursively expanding `PatKind::Or`s in `Matrix::push`.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69875.
r? @varkor
cc @Nadrieril
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/54883
make `mem::discriminant` const
implements #69821, which could be used as a tracking issue for `const_discriminant`.
Should this be added to the meta tracking issue #57563?
@Lokathor
Use TypeRelating for instantiating query responses
`eq` can add constraints to `RegionConstraintData`, which isn't allowed during borrow checking outside of a `CustomTypeOp`. Use `TypeRelating` instead to always push constraints to the obligations list.
closes#69490
Stabilize const for integer {to,from}_{be,le,ne}_bytes methods
All of these functions can be implemented simply and naturally as const functions, e.g. `u32::from_le_bytes` can be implemented as
```rust
(bytes[0] as u32)
| (bytes[1] as u32) << 8
| (bytes[2] as u32) << 16
| (bytes[3] as u32) << 24
```
So stabilizing the constness will not expose that internally they are implemented using transmute which is not const in stable.
Cleanup `rmeta::MacroDef`
Avoid using rountrip parsing in the encoder and in `fn load_macro_untracked`.
The main reason I was interested in this was to remove `rustc_parse` as a dependency of `rustc_metadata` but it seems like this had other benefits as well.
Fixes#49511.
r? @eddyb
cc @matthewjasper @estebank @petrochenkov
Remove spotlight
I had a few comments saying that this feature was at best misunderstood or not even used so I decided to organize a poll about on [twitter](https://twitter.com/imperioworld_/status/1232769353503956994). After 87 votes, the result is very clear: it's not useful. Considering the amount of code we have just to run it, I think it's definitely worth it to remove it.
r? @kinnison
cc @ollie27
