added --no-run option for rustdoc
resolve#59053
add `--no-run` option for `rustdoc` for compiling doc test but not running them.
Intended for use with `--persist-doctests`.
Be stricter about rejecting LLVM reserved registers in asm!
LLVM will silently produce incorrect code if these registers are used as operands.
cc `@rust-lang/wg-inline-asm`
Vastly improves coverage spans for macros
Fixes: #84561
This resolves problems where macros like `trace!(...)` would show zero coverage if tracing was disabled, and `assert_eq!(...)` would show zero coverage if the assertion did not fail, because only one coverage span was generated, for the branch.
This PR started with an idea that I could just drop branching blocks with same span as expanded macro. (See the fixed issue for more details.)
That did help, but it didn't resolve everything.
I also needed to add a span specifically for the macro name (plus `!`) to ensure the macro gets coverage even if it's internal expansion adds conditional branching blocks that are retained, and would otherwise drop the outer span. Now that outer span is _only_ the `(argument, list)`, which can safely be dropped now), because the macro name has its own span.
While testing, I also noticed the spanview debug output can cause an ICE on a function with no body. The
workaround for this is included in this PR (separate commit).
r? `@tmandry`
cc? `@wesleywiser`
Implement RFC 1260 with feature_name `imported_main`.
This is the second extraction part of #84062 plus additional adjustments.
This (mostly) implements RFC 1260.
However there's still one test case failure in the extern crate case. Maybe `LocalDefId` doesn't work here? I'm not sure.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/28937
r? `@petrochenkov`
Revert PR 77885 everywhere
Change to probe-stack=call (instead of inline-or-call) everywhere again, for now.
We had already reverted the change on stable back in PR #83412.
Since then, we've had some movement on issue #83139, but not a 100% fix.
But also since then, we had bug reported, issue #84667, that looks like outright codegen breakage, rather than problems confined to debuginfo issues. So we are reverting PR #77885 on stable and beta. We'll reland PR #77885 (or some variant) switching back to an LLVM-dependent selection of out-of-line call vs inline-asm, after these other issues have been resolved.
use correct feature flag for impl-block-level trait bounds on const fn
I am not sure what that special hack was needed for, but it doesn't seem needed any more...
This removes the last use of the `const_fn` feature flag -- Cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84510
r? `@oli-obk`
Add TRACKED_NO_CRATE_HASH and use it for `--remap-path-prefix`
I verified locally that this fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66955.
r? `@Aaron1011` (feel free to reassign)
Fix failed tests related to pointer printing when using GDB 10
As mentioned in #79009, there are four failed debuginfo test cases when using GDB 10. This PR fixes two of them, which fail because GDB 10 won't print pointers as string anymore. We can use `printf` as a workaround. It should work regardless of the version of GDB.
Refer this [comment] for more details.
[comment]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79009#issuecomment-826952708
rustdoc: change aliases attribute to data-aliases
The "aliases" attribute is not listed [on MDN], so it sounds like it's rustdoc-specific. We don't want to conflict with any attributes that are added to the spec in the future.
[on MDN]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/Heading_Elements
Adds feature-gated `#[no_coverage]` function attribute, to fix derived Eq `0` coverage issue #83601
Derived Eq no longer shows uncovered
The Eq trait has a special hidden function. MIR `InstrumentCoverage`
would add this function to the coverage map, but it is never called, so
the `Eq` trait would always appear uncovered.
Fixes: #83601
The fix required creating a new function attribute `no_coverage` to mark
functions that should be ignored by `InstrumentCoverage` and the
coverage `mapgen` (during codegen).
Adding a `no_coverage` feature gate with tracking issue #84605.
r? `@tmandry`
cc: `@wesleywiser`
Improve coverage spans for chained function calls
Fixes: #84180
For chained function calls separated by the `?` try operator, the
function call following the try operator produced a MIR `Call` span that
matched the span of the first call. The `?` try operator started a new
span, so the second call got no span.
It turns out the MIR `Call` terminator has a `func` `Operand`
for the `Constant` representing the function name, and the function
name's Span can be used to reset the starting position of the span.
r? `@tmandry`
cc: `@wesleywiser`
Revert "Rollup merge of #82296 - spastorino:pubrules, r=nikomatsakis"
This reverts commit e2561c58a4, reversing
changes made to 2982ba50fc.
As discussed in #83641 this feature is not complete and in particular doesn't work cross macros and given that this is not going to be included in edition 2021 nobody seems to be trying to fix the underlying problem. When can add this again I guess, whenever somebody has the time to make it work cross crates.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
The Eq trait has a special hidden function. MIR `InstrumentCoverage`
would add this function to the coverage map, but it is never called, so
the `Eq` trait would always appear uncovered.
Fixes: #83601
The fix required creating a new function attribute `no_coverage` to mark
functions that should be ignored by `InstrumentCoverage` and the
coverage `mapgen` (during codegen).
While testing, I also noticed two other issues:
* spanview debug file output ICEd on a function with no body. The
workaround for this is included in this PR.
* `assert_*!()` macro coverage can appear covered if followed by another
`assert_*!()` macro. Normally they appear uncovered. I submitted a new
Issue #84561, and added a coverage test to demonstrate this issue.
As mentioned in #79009, there are four failed debuginfo test cases
when using GDB 10. This commit fixes two of them, which fail because
GDB 10 won't print pointers as string anymore. We can use `printf`
as a workaround. It should work regardless of the version of GDB.
Refer this [comment] for more details.
[comment]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79009#issuecomment-826952708
