rustdoc: clean up tuple <-> primitive conversion docs
This adds a minor missing feature to `fake_variadic`, so that it can render `impl From<(T,)> for [T; 1]` correctly.
handle stage0 `cargo` and `rustc` separately
This change allows setting either `build.cargo` or `build.rustc` without requiring both to be set simultaneously, which was not possible previously.
To try it, set `build.rustc` without setting `build.cargo`, and try to bootstrap on clean build.
Blocker for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129152
library: Move unstable API of new_uninit to new features
- `new_zeroed` variants move to `new_zeroed_alloc`
- the `write` fn moves to `box_uninit_write`
The remainder will be stabilized in upcoming patches, as it was decided to only stabilize `uninit*` and `assume_init`.
Build `library/profiler_builtins` from `ci-llvm` if appropriate
Running all of `tests/coverage` requires the LLVM profiler runtime, which requires setting `build.profiler = true`.
Historically, doing that has required checking out the entire `src/llvm-project` submodule. For compiler contributors who otherwise don't need that submodule (thanks to `download-ci-vm`), that's quite inconvenient.
However, thanks to #129116, the downloaded CI LLVM tarball now contains a copy of LLVM's `compiler-rt` directory, which includes all the files needed to build the profiler runtime. So with a little bit of extra logic in bootstrap, we can have `library/profiler_builtins` look for the `compiler-rt` files in `ci-llvm` instead of the `src/llvm-project` submodule.
This change allows setting either `build.cargo` or `build.rustc` without requiring
both to be set simultaneously, which was not possible previously.
To try it, set `build.rustc` without setting `build.cargo`, and try to bootstrap on clean build.
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #128511 (Document WebAssembly target feature expectations)
- #129243 (do not build `cargo-miri` by default on stable channel)
- #129263 (Add a missing compatibility note in the 1.80.0 release notes)
- #129276 (Stabilize feature `char_indices_offset`)
- #129350 (adapt integer comparison tests for LLVM 20 IR changes)
- #129408 (Fix handling of macro arguments within the `dropping_copy_types` lint)
- #129426 (rustdoc-search: use tighter json for names and parents)
- #129437 (Fix typo in a help diagnostic)
- #129457 (kobzol vacation)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Document WebAssembly target feature expectations
This commit is a result of the discussion on #128475 and incorporates parts of #109807 as well. This is all done as a new page of documentation for the `wasm32-unknown-unknown` target which previously did not exist. This new page goes into details about the preexisting target and additionally documents the expectations for WebAssembly features and code generation.
The tl;dr is that LLVM will enable features over time after most engines have had support for awhile. Compiling without features requires `-Ctarget-cpu=mvp` to rustc plus `-Zbuild-std` to Cargo.
Closes#109807Closes#119811Closes#128475
Fix extern crates not being hidden with `doc(hidden)`
Fixes#126796.
Only the current crate should never be stripped, any other crate should be strippable.
r? ``@notriddle``
Migrate `x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx-lvi` `run-make` test to rmake
Part of #121876 and the associated [Google Summer of Code project](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/05/01/gsoc-2024-selected-projects.html).
The final Makefile! Every Makefile test is now claimed.
This is difficult to test due to the uncommon architecture it is specific to. I don't think it is in the CI (I didn't find it in `jobs.yml`, but if there is a way to test it, please do.
Locally, on Linux, it compiles and panics at the `llvm_filecheck` part (if I replace the `x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx` with `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`, of course), which is expected.
For this reason, the Makefile and associated script have been kept, but with a leading underscore.
Ship MinGW-w64 runtime DLLs along with `rust-lld.exe` for `-pc-windows-gnu` targets
`rust-lld.exe` built for `x86_64-pc-windows-gnu` depends on `libgcc_s_seh-1.dll` and `libwinpthread-1.dll` from MinGW-w64. Until now, they were not shipped alongside `rust-lld.exe`, and you could not run `rust-lld.exe` on most systems.
This problem didn't surface until now because:
* Most targets don't use `rust-lld` by default.
* Some people had these DLLs in their `PATH` from some other MinGW binary.
* `rustup` used to add `bin` to the `PATH`, which contains these DLLs for `rustc.exe`. But it no longer does that: ce3c09a0cbFixes#125809
try-job: dist-x86_64-mingw
Revert #129187 and #129302
The two PRs naively switched to `std::fs::remove_dir_all`, but failed to gracefully handle the failure case where the top-level directory entry does not exist, causing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129187#issuecomment-2304849757 `./x clean` to fail locally when `tmp` does not exist.
I plan to reland the two PRs with fixed top-level dir entry handling and more testing, but let's quickly revert to unblock people.
Reverts #129187.
Reverts #129302.
r? bootstrap
