Use doc comments from 'pub use' statements
Split off from #62855
Currently, rustdoc ignores any doc comments found on 'pub use'
statements. As described in issue #58700, this makes it impossible to
properly document procedural macros. Any doc comments must be written on
the procedural macro definition, which must occur in a dedicated
proc-macro crate. This means that any doc comments or doc tests cannot
reference items defined in re-exporting crate, despite the fact that
such items may be required to use the procedural macro.
To solve this issue, this commit allows doc comments to be written on
'pub use' statements. For consistency, this applies to *all* 'pub use'
statements, not just those importing procedural macros.
When inlining documentation, documentation on 'pub use' statements will
be prepended to the documentation of the inlined item. For example,
the following items:
```rust
mod other_mod {
/// Doc comment from definition
pub struct MyStruct;
}
/// Doc comment from 'pub use'
///
pub use other_mod::MyStruct;
```
will caues the documentation for the re-export of 'MyStruct' to be
rendered as:
```
Doc comment from 'pub use'
Doc comment from definition
```
Note the empty line in the 'pub use' doc comments - because doc comments
are concatenated as-is, this ensure that the doc comments on the
definition start on a new line.
Change opaque type syntax from `existential type` to type alias `impl Trait`
This implements a new feature gate `type_alias_impl_trait` (this is slightly different from the originally proposed feature name, but matches what has been used in discussion since), deprecating the old `existential_types` feature.
The syntax for opaque types has been changed. In addition, the "existential" terminology has been replaced with "opaque", as per previous discussion and the RFC.
This makes partial progress towards implementing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/63063.
r? @Centril
rustc: Stabilize options for pipelined compilation
This commit stabilizes options in the compiler necessary for Cargo to
enable "pipelined compilation" by default. The concept of pipelined
compilation, how it's implemented, and what it means for rustc are
documented in #60988. This PR is coupled with a PR against Cargo
(rust-lang/cargo#7143) which updates Cargo's support for pipelined
compliation to rustc, and also enables support by default in Cargo.
(note that the Cargo PR cannot land until this one against rustc lands).
The technical changes performed here were to stabilize the functionality
proposed in #60419 and #60987, the underlying pieces to enable pipelined
compilation support in Cargo. The issues have had some discussion during
stabilization, but the newly stabilized surface area here is:
* A new `--json` flag was added to the compiler.
* The `--json` flag can be passed multiple times.
* The value of the `--json` flag is a comma-separated list of
directives.
* The `--json` flag cannot be combined with `--color`
* The `--json` flag must be combined with `--error-format=json`
* The acceptable list of directives to `--json` are:
* `diagnostic-short` - the `rendered` field of diagnostics will have a
"short" rendering matching `--error-format=short`
* `diagnostic-rendered-ansi` - the `rendered` field of diagnostics
will be colorized with ansi color codes embedded in the string field
* `artifacts` - JSON blobs will be emitted for artifacts being emitted
by the compiler
The unstable `-Z emit-artifact-notifications` and `--json-rendered`
flags have also been removed during this commit as well.
Closes#60419Closes#60987Closes#60988
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #61856 (Lint attributes on function arguments)
- #62360 (Document that ManuallyDrop::drop should not called more than once)
- #62392 (Update minifier-rs version)
- #62871 (Explicit error message for async recursion.)
- #62995 (Avoid ICE when suggestion span is at Eof)
- #63053 (SystemTime docs: recommend Instant for elapsed time)
- #63081 (tidy: Cleanup the directory whitelist)
- #63088 (Remove anonymous_parameters from unrelated test)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
Split off from #62855
Currently, rustdoc ignores any doc comments found on 'pub use'
statements. As described in issue #58700, this makes it impossible to
properly document procedural macros. Any doc comments must be written on
the procedural macro definition, which must occur in a dedicated
proc-macro crate. This means that any doc comments or doc tests cannot
reference items defined in re-exporting crate, despite the fact that
such items may be required to use the procedural macro.
To solve this issue, this commit allows doc comments to be written on
'pub use' statements. For consistency, this applies to *all* 'pub use'
statements, not just those importing procedural macros.
When inlining documentation, documentation on 'pub use' statements will
be prepended to the documentation of the inlined item. For example,
the following items:
```rust
mod other_mod {
/// Doc comment from definition
pub struct MyStruct;
}
/// Doc comment from 'pub use'
///
pub use other_mod::MyStruct;
```
will caues the documentation for the re-export of 'MyStruct' to be
rendered as:
```
Doc comment from 'pub use'
Doc comment from definition
```
Note the empty line in the 'pub use' doc comments - because doc comments
are concatenated as-is, this ensure that the doc comments on the
definition start on a new line.
Introduce `as_deref` to Option
This is re-submission for #59628.
Renames `deref()` to `as_deref()` and adds `deref_mut()` impls and tests.
CC #50264
r? @Kimundi
(I picked you as you're the previous reviewer.)
This commit stabilizes options in the compiler necessary for Cargo to
enable "pipelined compilation" by default. The concept of pipelined
compilation, how it's implemented, and what it means for rustc are
documented in #60988. This PR is coupled with a PR against Cargo
(rust-lang/cargo#7143) which updates Cargo's support for pipelined
compliation to rustc, and also enables support by default in Cargo.
(note that the Cargo PR cannot land until this one against rustc lands).
The technical changes performed here were to stabilize the functionality
proposed in #60419 and #60987, the underlying pieces to enable pipelined
compilation support in Cargo. The issues have had some discussion during
stabilization, but the newly stabilized surface area here is:
* A new `--json` flag was added to the compiler.
* The `--json` flag can be passed multiple times.
* The value of the `--json` flag is a comma-separated list of
directives.
* The `--json` flag cannot be combined with `--color`
* The `--json` flag must be combined with `--error-format=json`
* The acceptable list of directives to `--json` are:
* `diagnostic-short` - the `rendered` field of diagnostics will have a
"short" rendering matching `--error-format=short`
* `diagnostic-rendered-ansi` - the `rendered` field of diagnostics
will be colorized with ansi color codes embedded in the string field
* `artifacts` - JSON blobs will be emitted for artifacts being emitted
by the compiler
The unstable `-Z emit-artifact-notifications` and `--json-rendered`
flags have also been removed during this commit as well.
Closes#60419Closes#60987Closes#60988
Replace unsafe_destructor_blind_to_params with may_dangle
This PR will completely remove support for `#[unsafe_destructor_blind_to_params]` attribute,
which is deprecated in #38970 by `[may_dangle]` unsafe attribute.
Closes#34761
[rustdoc] Fix storage usage when disabled
Fixes#61239.
@starblue: Can you give a try to this change please? I tried on chrome and firefox and both worked so if you're using another web browser, that might be useful. :)
r? @Manishearth
Also move macro stability checking closer to other checks performed on obtained resolutions.
Tighten the stability spans as well, it is an error to *refer* to and unstable entity in any way, not only "call" it.
It's internal to resolve and always results in `Res::Err` outside of resolve.
Instead put `DefKind::Fn`s themselves into the macro namespace, it's ok.
Proc macro stubs are items placed into macro namespase for functions that define proc macros.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/52383
The rustdoc test is changed because the old test didn't actually reproduce the ICE it was supposed to reproduce.
Remove support for 1-token lookahead from the lexer
`StringReader` maintained `peek_token` and `peek_span_src_raw` for look ahead.
`peek_token` was used only by rustdoc syntax coloring. After moving peeking logic into highlighter, I was able to remove `peek_token` from the lexer. I tried to use `iter::Peekable`, but that wasn't as pretty as I hoped, due to buffered fatal errors. So I went with hand-rolled peeking.
After that I've noticed that the only peeking behavior left was for raw tokens to test tt jointness. I've rewritten it in terms of trivia tokens, and not just spans.
After that it became possible to simplify the awkward constructor of the lexer, which could return `Err` if the first peeked token contained error.
The (almost) culmination of HirIdification
It's finally over.
This PR removes old `FIXME`s and renames some functions so that the `HirId` variant has the shorter name.
All that remains (and rightfully so) is stuff in `resolve`, `save_analysis` and (as far as I can tell) in a few places where we can't replace `NodeId` with `HirId`.
Implement another internal lints
cc #49509
This adds ~~two~~ one internal lint~~s~~:
1. LINT_PASS_IMPL_WITHOUT_MACRO: Make sure, that the `{declare,impl}_lint_pass` macro is used to implement lint passes. cc #59669
2. ~~USAGE_OF_TYCTXT_AND_SPAN_ARGS: item 2 on the list in #49509~~
~~With 2. I wasn't sure, if this lint should be applied everywhere. That means a careful review of 0955835 would be great. Also 73fb9b4 allows this lint on some functions. Should I also apply this lint there?~~
TODO (not directly relevant for review):
- [ ] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/59316#discussion_r280186517 (not sure yet, if this works or how to query for `rustc_private`, since it's not in [`Features`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/syntax/feature_gate/struct.Features.html) 🤔 cc @eddyb)
- [x] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/61735#discussion_r292389870
- [x] Check explicitly for the `{declare,impl}_lint_pass!` macros
r? @oli-obk
The reader itself doesn't need ability to peek tokens, so it's better
if clients implement this functionality.
This hopefully becomes especially easy once we use iterator interface
for lexer, but this is not too easy at the moment, because of buffered
errors.
rustc: use a separate copy of P for HIR than for AST.
Note: this currently includes/is based on top of #61987.
Like #61968, but goes one step further and uses a separate `P<...>` for the HIR, with no `Clone`, or the ability to mutate after allocation.
There is still `into_inner`/`into_iter`, but they're only exposed for `hir::lowering`, and they would take more work to untangle.
r? @petrochenkov cc @rust-lang/compiler
