Fixes#81531
When we buffer an early lint for a macro invocation,
we need to determine which NodeId to take the lint level from.
Currently, we use the `NodeId` of the closest def parent. However, if
the macro invocation is inside the desugared closure from an `async fn`
or async closure, that `NodeId` does not actually exist in the AST.
This commit explicitly calls `check_lint` for the `NodeId`s of closures
desugared from async expressions, ensuring that we do not miss any
buffered lints.
Improve handling of spans around macro result parse errors
Fixes#81543
After we expand a macro, we try to parse the resulting tokens as a AST
node. This commit makes several improvements to how we handle spans when
an error occurs:
* Only ovewrite the original `Span` if it's a dummy span. This preserves
a more-specific span if one is available.
* Use `self.prev_token` instead of `self.token` when emitting an error
message after encountering EOF, since an EOF token always has a dummy
span
* Make `SourceMap::next_point` leave dummy spans unused. A dummy span
does not have a logical 'next point', since it's a zero-length span.
Re-using the span span preserves its 'dummy-ness' for other checks
Add some tests for associated-type-bounds issues
Closes#38917Closes#40093Closes#43475Closes#63591#47897 is likely closable too, but it needs an MCVE
~~#38917, #40093, #43475, #47897 all are mislabeled and shouldn't have the `F-associated-type-bounds` label~~
~~#71685 is also mislabeled as commented on in that thread~~
Add lint for 2229 migrations
Implements the first for RFC 2229 where we make the decision to migrate a root variable based on if the type of the variable needs Drop and if the root variable would be moved into the closure when the feature isn't enabled.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Fix primitive search in parameters and returned values
Part of #60485.
Fixes#74780.
Replacing #74879.
cc `@camelid` `@jyn514` `@CraftSpider`
r? `@ollie27`
- This allows us add fake information after handling migrations if
needed.
- Capture analysis also priortizes what we see earlier, which means
fake information should go in last.
Add visitors for checking #[inline]
Add visitors for checking #[inline] with struct field
Fix test for #[inline]
Add visitors for checking #[inline] with #[macro_export] macro
Add visitors for checking #[inline] without #[macro_export] macro
Add use alias with Visitor
Fix lint error
Reduce unnecessary variable
Co-authored-by: LingMan <LingMan@users.noreply.github.com>
Change error to warning
Add warning for checking field, arm with #[allow_internal_unstable]
Add name resolver
Formatting
Formatting
Fix error fixture
Add checking field, arm, macro def
Add error message for private fn
Attempts to add a more detailed error when a `const_evaluatable` fn from another scope is used inside of a scope which cannot access it.
r? ````@lcnr````
Fixes#81543
After we expand a macro, we try to parse the resulting tokens as a AST
node. This commit makes several improvements to how we handle spans when
an error occurs:
* Only ovewrite the original `Span` if it's a dummy span. This preserves
a more-specific span if one is available.
* Use `self.prev_token` instead of `self.token` when emitting an error
message after encountering EOF, since an EOF token always has a dummy
span
* Make `SourceMap::next_point` leave dummy spans unused. A dummy span
does not have a logical 'next point', since it's a zero-length span.
Re-using the span span preserves its 'dummy-ness' for other checks
Add a test for #71202Closes#71202
---
Note that the test normally generates this warning:
```
warning: cannot use constants which depend on generic parameters in types
--> test.rs:10:5
|
10 | / const ITEM_IS_COPY: [(); 1 - {
11 | | trait NotCopy {
12 | | const VALUE: bool = false;
13 | | }
... |
26 | | <IsCopy<T>>::VALUE
27 | | } as usize] = [];
| |_____________________^
|
= note: `#[warn(const_evaluatable_unchecked)]` on by default
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #76200 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76200>
```
I added `allow(const_evaluatable_unchecked)`, but maybe we just don't want to add a test for this as the program is not really valid?
Remove const_in_array_repeat
Fixes#80371. Fixes#81315. Fixes#80767. Fixes#75682.
I thought there might be some issue with `Repeats(_, 0)`, but if you increase the items in the array it still ICEs. I'm not sure if this is the best fix but it does fix the given issue.
2229: Fix issues with move closures and mutability
This PR fixes two issues when feature `capture_disjoint_fields` is used.
1. Can't mutate using a mutable reference
2. Move closures try to move value out through a reference.
To do so, we
1. Compute the mutability of the capture and store it as part of the `CapturedPlace` that is written in TypeckResults
2. Restrict capture precision. Note this is temporary for now, to allow the feature to be used with move closures and ByValue captures and might change depending on discussions with the lang team.
- No Derefs are captured for ByValue captures, since that will result in value behind a reference getting moved.
- No projections are applied to raw pointers since these require unsafe blocks. We capture
them completely.
r? `````@nikomatsakis`````
Balance sidebar `Deref` cycle check with main content
The `Deref` cycle checks added as part of #80653 were "unbalanced" in the sense
that the main content code path checks for cycles _before_ descending, while the
sidebar checks _after_. Checking _before_ is correct, so this changes the
sidebar path to match the main content path.
Fixes#81395
r? ```@GuillaumeGomez```
Clone entire `TokenCursor` when collecting tokens
Reverts PR #80830Fixestaiki-e/pin-project#312
We can have an arbitrary number of `None`-delimited group frames pushed
on the stack due to proc-macro invocations, which can legally be exited.
Attempting to account for this would add a lot of complexity for a tiny
performance gain, so let's just use the original strategy.
Stabilize by-value `[T; N]` iterator `core::array::IntoIter`
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65798
This is unblocked now that `min_const_generics` has been stabilized in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79135.
This PR does *not* include the corresponding `IntoIterator` impl, which is https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/65819. Instead, an iterator can be constructed through the `new` method.
`new` would become unnecessary when `IntoIterator` is implemented and might be deprecated then, although it will stay stable.
The `Deref` cycle checks added as part of #80653 were "unbalanced" in the sense
that the main content code path checks for cycles _before_ descending, while the
sidebar checks _after_. Checking _before_ is correct, so this changes the
sidebar path to match the main content path.
cfg(version): treat nightlies as complete
This PR makes cfg(version) treat the nightlies
for version 1.n.0 as 1.n.0, even though that nightly
version might not have all stabilizations and features
of the released 1.n.0. This is done for greater
convenience for people who want to test a newly
stabilized feature on nightly, or in other words,
give newly stabilized features as many eyeballs
as possible.
For users who wish to pin nightlies, this commit adds
a -Z assume-incomplete-release option that they can
enable if they run into any issues due to this change.
Implements the suggestion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/64796#issuecomment-640851454
Support FRU pattern with `[feature(capture_disjoint_fields)]`
In case of a functional record update syntax for creating a structure, `ExprUseVisitor` to only detect the precise use of some of the field in the `..x` part of the syntax. However, when we start building MIR, we
1. First, build the place for `x`
2. and then, add precise field projections so that only some parts of `x` end up getting read.
When `capture_disjoint_fields` is enabled, and FRU is used within a closure `x` won't be completely captured, and therefore the first step will fail. This PR updates `mir_build` to create a place builder in the first step and then create place from the builder only after applying the field projection.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/32
r? ``````@nikomatsakis``````
Stabilize raw ref macros
This stabilizes `raw_ref_macros` (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73394), which is possible now that https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74355 is fixed.
However, as I already said in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73394#issuecomment-751342185, I am not particularly happy with the current names of the macros. So I propose we also change them, which means I am proposing to stabilize the following in `core::ptr`:
```rust
pub macro const_addr_of($e:expr) {
&raw const $e
}
pub macro mut_addr_of($e:expr) {
&raw mut $e
}
```
The macro name change means we need another round of FCP. Cc `````@rust-lang/libs`````
Fixes#73394
This seems right, given that conceptually bools are unsigned, but the
implications of this change may have more action at distance that I'm
not sure how to exhaustively consider.
For instance there are a number of cases where code attaches range
metadata if `scalar.is_bool()` holds. Supposedly it would no longer be
attached to the `repr(i8)` enums? Though I'm not sure why booleans are
being special-cased here in the first place...
Fixes#80556
