Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #119838 (style-guide: When breaking binops handle multi-line first operand better)
- #124844 (Use a proper probe for shadowing impl)
- #125047 (Migrate `run-make/issue-14500` to new `rmake.rs` format)
- #125080 (only find segs chain for missing methods when no available candidates)
- #125088 (Uplift `AliasTy` and `AliasTerm`)
- #125100 (Don't do post-method-probe error reporting steps if we're in a suggestion)
- #125118 (Use new utility functions/methods in run-make tests)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
style-guide: When breaking binops handle multi-line first operand better
Use the indentation of the *last* line of the first operand, not the first.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/style-team/issues/189
Add x86_64-unknown-linux-none target
Adds a freestanding linux binary with no libc dependency. This is useful for writing programs written only in rust. It is also essential for writing low level stuff like libc or a dynamic linker.
Tier 3 policy:
>A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
I will be the designed maintainer for this target
>Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target.
The target triple is consistent with other targets
>Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it.
If possible, use only letters, numbers, dashes and underscores for the name. Periods (.) are known to cause issues in Cargo.
There is no confusion with other targets since it explicitly adds "none" at the end instead of omitting the environment
>Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.
The target does not introduce any unusual requirement
>The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
There are no license incompatibilities
> Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).
Everything added is under that license
>The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements.
There are no new dependencies
>Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries. Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require such libraries at all. For instance, rustc built for the target may depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library, but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
There is no proprietary dependencies
>"onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous" legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms, requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its developers or users.
No such terms exist for this target
>Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.
>This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
Understood
>Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.
The target already implements core. It might be possible in the future to add support for alloc and std by leveraging crates such as [origin](https://github.com/sunfishcode/origin/) and [rustix](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/rustix)
> The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
I believe the proper docs are added
>Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via `@)` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.
> Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications.
Understood
> Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.
> In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
No other targets are effected
>Tier 3 targets must be able to produce assembly using at least one of rustc's supported backends from any host target.
The same backends used by other linux targets work without issues
This commit fixes several issues in the fuchsia-test-runner.py script:
1. Migrate from `pm` to `ffx` for package management, as `pm` is now
deprecated. Furthermore, the `pm` calls used in this script no longer
work at Fuchsia's HEAD. This is the largest change in this commit, and
impacts all steps around repository management (creation and
registration of the repo, as well as package publishing).
2. Allow for `libtest` to be either statically or dynamically linked.
The script assumed it was dynamically linked, but the current Rust
behavior at HEAD is to statically link it.
3. Minor cleanup to use `ffx --machine json` rather than string parsing.
4. Minor cleanup to the docs around the script.
Make check-cfg docs more user-friendly
This PR improves the `--check-cfg` to make them more user-friendly by:
- explaining the purpose of the feature
- removing the "form" jargon
- making it (bit) less formal and more "friendly"
- making the doc less cluttered
- and by fixing (the width and flags) of the examples
`@rustbot` label +F-check-cfg
Change `SIGPIPE` ui from `#[unix_sigpipe = "..."]` to `-Zon-broken-pipe=...`
In the stabilization [attempt](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120832) of `#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]`, a concern was [raised ](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120832#issuecomment-2007394609) related to using a language attribute for the feature: Long term, we want `fn lang_start()` to be definable by any crate, not just libstd. Having a special language attribute in that case becomes awkward.
So as a first step towards the next stabilization attempt, this PR changes the `#[unix_sigpipe = "..."]` attribute to a compiler flag `-Zon-broken-pipe=...` to remove that concern, since now the language is not "contaminated" by this feature.
Another point was [also raised](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120832#issuecomment-1987023484), namely that the ui should not leak **how** it does things, but rather what the **end effect** is. The new flag uses the proposed naming. This is of course something that can be iterated on further before stabilization.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97889
In the stabilization attempt of `#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]`, a concern
was raised related to using a language attribute for the feature: Long
term, we want `fn lang_start()` to be definable by any crate, not just
libstd. Having a special language attribute in that case becomes
awkward.
So as a first step towards towards the next stabilization attempt, this
PR changes the `#[unix_sigpipe = "..."]` attribute to a compiler flag
`-Zon-broken-pipe=...` to remove that concern, since now the language
is not "contaminated" by this feature.
Another point was also raised, namely that the ui should not leak
**how** it does things, but rather what the **end effect** is. The new
flag uses the proposed naming. This is of course something that can be
iterated on further before stabilization.
Arm bare-metal target doc changes
Updates the Arm bare-metal target docs:
* Detailed pages for all the Cortex-M targets, including details about setting target-cpu and target-features to suit specific Arm models
* More detail about the difference between `eabi` and `eabihf`
* Marks the Embedded Devices Working Group Cortex-M Team as the maintainer of the Cortex-M targets
rustc: document the jobserver
Explicitly document that the jobserver may be used by `rustc`, as well as recommend the `+` indicator for integration of `rustc` into GNU Make.
In particular, show the warning to increase the chances that this document is found when searching for solutions online.
In addition, add a note about the issue with GNU Make 4.3 since it is important that users realize they should do this even if they do not expect parallelism from `rustc`.
Finally, show how to workaround the issue of `$(shell ...)` calls in recursive Make (which e.g. was needed for the Linux kernel).
The GNU Make 4.4 case under `--jobserver-style=pipe` is not added since it got fixed after Rust 1.76.0 already (i.e. `rustc` will not warn if it finds the negative file descriptors).
From: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120515
Cc: `@petrochenkov` `@belovdv` `@weihanglo` `@bjorn3`
---
v2: To be able to use tab characters for the Make examples, add `<!-- ignore-tidy-{check} -->` support to `tidy`.
v3: Added "Integration with build systems" section to hold the GNU Make one. Added "by clearing the `MAKEFLAGS` variable". Added "aforementioned" so that it is clear we are talking about the warning above.
v4: Added CMake subsection. Added a note that `rustc` may be affected by other flags, e.g. `CARGO_MAKEFLAGS`.
v5: Added that `rustc` will choose the number of jobs if a jobserver is not passed.
Yes it looks weird, but this is how Arm write it now.
I left ARM64 alone, because it's a Microsoft/Apple term but not an Arm term (they have Armv8-A and Armv9-A architectures, which say that A64 instructions are executed when in the Aarch64 state), and I don't want to get into that, especially for a Tier 1 target.
Explicitly document that the jobserver may be used by `rustc` and show
the warning to increase the chances that this document is found when
searching for solutions online.
In particular, add a section about the interaction with build systems,
which is intended to contain recommendations on how to integrate `rustc`
with different built systems.
For GNU Make, recommend using the `+` indicator. In addition, add a
note about the issue with GNU Make 4.3 since it is important that users
realize they should do this even if they do not expect parallelism from
`rustc`. Finally, show how to workaround the issue of `$(shell ...)`
calls in recursive Make (which e.g. was needed for the Linux kernel).
The GNU Make 4.4 case under `--jobserver-style=pipe` is not added since
it got fixed after Rust 1.76.0 already (i.e. `rustc` will not warn if
it finds the negative file descriptors).
For CMake, recommend using `JOB_SERVER_AWARE` and show a workaround using
`$(MAKE)` for earlier versions (when using the Makefile generator).
From: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120515
Cc: @petrochenkov @belovdv @weihanglo @bjorn3
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
