Fix fn front matter parsing ICE from invalid code.
Fixes#60075.
This PR fixes an "unreachable code" ICE that results from parsing
invalid code where the compiler is expecting the next trait item
declaration in the middle of the previous trait item due to extra
closing braces.
r? @estebank (thanks for the minimized test case)
This commit fixes an "unreachable code" ICE that results from parsing
invalid code where the compiler is expecting the next trait item
declaration in the middle of the previous trait item due to extra
closing braces.
When looking at the documentation for `std::f32` or `std::str`, for
example, it is easy to get confused and assume `std::f32` and `f32`
are the same thing. Because of this, it is not uncommon to attempt
writing `f32::consts::PI` instead of the correct
`std::f32::consts::PI`. When encountering the former, which results
in an access error due to it being an inexistent path, try to access
the same path under `std`. If this succeeds, this information is
stored for later tweaking of the final E0599 to provide an
appropriate suggestion.
This suggestion applies to both E0233 and E0599 and is only checked
when the first ident of a path corresponds to a primitive type.
Resolve inconsistency in error messages between "parameter" and "variable".
The inconsistency was introduced in 104fe1c4db (#33619), when a label saying `type variable` was added to an error with a message talking about `type parameters`.
Given that `parameter` is far more prevalent when referring to generics in the context of Rust, IMO it should be that in both the message and the label.
r? @nikomatsakis or @estebank
Add test checking that Index<T: ?Sized> works
I've noticed that we have an `Idx: ?Sized` bound on the **index** in the `Index`, which seems strange given that we accept index by value. My guess is that it was meant to be removed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/23601, but was overlooked.
If I remove this bound, `./x.py src/libstd/ src/libcore/` passes, which means at least that this is not covered by test.
I think there's three things we can do here:
* run crater with the bound removed to check if there are any regressions, and merge this, to be consistent with other operator traits
* run crater, get regressions, write a test for this with a note that "hey, we tried to fix it, its unfixable"
* decide, in the light of by-value DSTs, that this is a feature rather than a bug, and add a test
cc @rust-lang/libs
EDIT: the forth alternative is that there exist a genuine reason why this is the case, but I failed to see it :D
