always check alignment during CTFE
We originally disabled alignment checks because they got in the way -- there are some things we do with the interpreter during CTFE which does not correspond to actually running user-written code, but is purely administrative, and we didn't want alignment checks there, so we just disabled them entirely. But with `-Zextra-const-ub-checks` we anyway had to figure out how to disable those alignment checks while doing checks in regular code. So now it is easy to enable CTFE alignment checking by default. Let's see what the perf consequences of that are.
r? `@oli-obk`
rustdoc: remove unnecessary CSS `kbd { cursor: default }`
Added along with theme picker changes in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/47686/files#diff-7dc22a0530802d77c2f2ec9e834024a5657b6eab4055520fca46edc99a544413R1144, but no reason seems to have been given at the time for why this particular rule was added.
Removing this rule results in `<kbd>` elements getting an I-bar, while the rule causes them to use the "default" arrow, but since selecting the text in these elements works fine, the I-bar is not misleading.
Auto traits in `dyn Trait + Auto` are suggestable
Not sure why I had made the `IsSuggestableVisitor` have that rule to not consider `dyn Trait + Auto` to be suggestable.
It's possible that this was done because of the fact that we don't print the right parentheses for `&(dyn Trait + Auto)`, but that's a problem with printing these types in general that we probably have tracked somewhere else...
Ensure async trait impls are async (or otherwise return an opaque type)
As a workaround for the full `#[refine]` semantics not being implemented
yet, forbit returning a concrete future type like `Box<dyn Future>` or a
manually implemented Future.
`-> impl Future` is still permitted; while that can also cause
accidental refinement, that's behind a different feature gate
(`return_position_impl_trait_in_trait`) and that problem exists
regardless of whether the trait method is async, so will have to be
solved more generally.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102745
Highlight conflicting param-env candidates, again
Un-reverts #98794 (i.e. reverts #99290).
The previous time I attempted to land this PR, it was because of an incremental issue (#99233). The repro instructions in the issue is no longer manifest the ICE -- I think it's because this ambiguity code was refactored (I think by `@lcnr)` to no longer store the ambiguities in the fulfillment error, but instead recompute them on the fly.
The main motivation for trying to re-land this is that it fixes#105131 by highlighting the root-cause of the issue, which is conflicting param-env candidates:
```
error[E0283]: type annotations needed: cannot satisfy `Self: Gen<'source>`
|
note: multiple `impl`s or `where` clauses satisfying `Self: Gen<'source>` found
--> $DIR/conflicting-bounds.rs:3:1
|
LL | pub trait Gen<'source> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...
LL | Self: for<'s> Gen<'s, Output = T>;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0283`.
```
Fixes#105131.
Fixes (again) #98786
As a workaround for the full `#[refine]` semantics not being implemented
yet, forbit returning a concrete future type like `Box<dyn Future>` or a
manually implemented Future.
`-> impl Future` is still permitted; while that can also cause
accidental refinement, that's behind a different feature gate
(`return_position_impl_trait_in_trait`) and that problem exists
regardless of whether the trait method is async, so will have to be
solved more generally.
Fixes#102745
Added along with theme picker changes in
e78f1392b7, but no reason seems to have been
given at the time for why this particular rule was added.
Removing this rule results in `<kbd>` elements getting an I-bar, while the
rule causes them to use the "default" arrow, but since selecting the text in
these elements works fine, the I-bar is not misleading.
Add a test for #92481
The test was copied ad-hoc from #92481, but I can't get the test to pass, because of needing to get twice the same error on the last line of the source.
Closes#92481
fold instead of obliterating args
Fixes#105608
we call `const_eval_resolve` on the following constant:
```
def: playground::{impl#0}::and::{constant#0},
substs: [
ConstKind::Unevaluated {
def: playground::{impl#0}::and::{constant#0},
substs: [
ConstKind::Value(0x0),
_,
]
}
_,
],
```
when expanded out to `ConstKind::Expr` there are no infer vars so we attempt to evaluate it after replacing infer vars with garbage, however the current logic for replacing with garbage replaces _the whole arg containing the infer var_ rather than just the infer var. This means that after garbage replacement has occured we attempt to evaluate:
```
def: playground::{impl#0}::and::{constant#0},
substs: [
PLACEHOLDER,
PLACEHOLDER,
],
```
Which then leads to ctfe being unable to evaluate the const. With this PR we attempt to evaluate:
```
def: playground::{impl#0}::and::{constant#0},
substs: [
ConstKind::Unevaluated {
def: playground::{impl#0}::and::{constant#0},
substs: [
ConstKind::Value(0x0),
PLACEHOLDER,
]
}
PLACEHOLDER,
],
```
which ctfe _can_ handle.
I am not entirely sure why this function is supposed to replace params with placeholders rather than just inference vars 🤔
