Optimize `array::IntoIter`
`.into_iter()` on arrays was slower than it needed to be (especially compared to slice iterator) since it uses `Range<usize>`, which needs to handle degenerate ranges like `10..4`.
This PR adds an internal `IndexRange` type that's like `Range<usize>` but with a safety invariant that means it doesn't need to worry about those cases -- it only handles `start <= end` -- and thus can give LLVM more information to optimize better.
I added one simple demonstration of the improvement as a codegen test.
(`vec::IntoIter` uses pointers instead of indexes, so doesn't have this problem, but that only works because its elements are boxed. `array::IntoIter` can't use pointers because that would keep it from being movable.)
Make the `normalize-overflow` rustdoc test actually do something
Since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/88679, rustdoc doesn't load crates eagerly. Add an explicit `extern crate` item to make sure the crate is loaded and the bug reproduces.
You can verify this fix by adding `// compile-flags: -Znormalize-docs` and running the test to make sure it gives an error.
`.into_iter()` on arrays was slower than it needed to be (especially compared to slice iterator) since it uses `Range<usize>`, which needs to handle degenerate ranges like `10..4`.
This PR adds an internal `IndexRange` type that's like `Range<usize>` but with a safety invariant that means it doesn't need to worry about those cases -- it only handles `start <= end` -- and thus can give LLVM more information to optimize better.
I added one simple demonstration of the improvement as a codegen test.
Since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/88679, rustdoc doesn't load crates eagerly.
Add an explicit `extern crate` item to make sure the crate is loaded and the bug reproduces.
You can verify this fix by adding `// compile-flags: -Znormalizing-docs` and running the test.
In particular, this allows rustdoc to recover from cycle errors when normalizing associated types for documentation.
In the past, `@jackh726` has said we need to be careful about overflow errors:
> Off the top of my head, we definitely should be careful about treating overflow errors the same as
"not implemented for some reason" errors. Otherwise, you could end up with behavior that is
different depending on recursion depth. But, that might be context-dependent.
But cycle errors should be safe to unconditionally report; they don't depend on the recursion depth, they will always be an error whenever they're encountered.
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #101389 (Tone down explanation on RefCell::get_mut)
- #101798 (Make `from_waker`, `waker` and `from_raw` unstably `const`)
- #101881 (Remove an unused struct field `late_bound`)
- #101904 (Add help for invalid inline argument)
- #101966 (Add unit test for identifier Unicode emoji diagnostics)
- #101979 (Update release notes for 1.64)
- #101985 (interpret: expose generate_stacktrace without full InterpCx)
- #102004 (Try to clarify what's new in 1.64.0 ffi types)
- #102005 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `td.summary-column`)
- #102017 (Add all submodules to the list of directories tidy skips)
- #102019 (Remove backed off PRs from relnotes)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Avoid duplicating StorageLive in let-else
cc `@est31`
Fix#101867Fix#101932#101410 introduced directives to activate storages of bindings in let-else earlier. However, since it is using the machinery of `match` and friends for pattern matching and binding, those storages are activated for the second time. This PR adjusts this behavior and avoid the duplicated activation for let-else statements.
Add unit test for identifier Unicode emoji diagnostics
Seems current diagnostics has some support for emoji usages, however it seems outdated and incomplete. This adds a simple unit test to showcase the status quo.
Add help for invalid inline argument
Fixes#101712
Removed 1 part of the test as its identical with another one. Do let me know if this is undesirable, so I can revert those changes.
Add a codegen test for `slice::from_ptr_range`
I noticed back in #95579 that this didn't optimize as well as it should.
It's better now, after #95837 changed the code in `from_ptr_range` and https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54824 was fixed in LLVM 15.
So here's a test to keep it generating the good version.
change AccessLevels representation
Part of RFC (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48054). This patch implements effective visibility table with basic methods and change AccessLevels table representation according to it.
r? ``@petrochenkov``
