Simplify Iterator::{min, max}
This PR simplifies the `select_fold1` helper method used to implmement `Iterator::{min, min_by, min_by_key, max, max_by, max_by_key}` by removing the projection argument, which was only used by the implementations of `min_by_key` and `max_by_key`.
I also added tests to ensure that the stability as mentioned in the comments of `min` and `max` is preserved, and fixed the `iter::{bench_max, bench_max_by_key}` benchmarks which the compiler presumably was able to collapse into closed-form expressions. None of the benchmark results were impacted, I suspect their generated assembly didn't change.
RangeInclusive internal iteration performance improvement.
Specialize `Iterator::try_fold` and `DoubleEndedIterator::try_rfold` to improve code generation in all internal iteration scenarios.
This changes brings the performance of internal iteration with `RangeInclusive` on par with the performance of iteration with `Range`:
- Single conditional jump in hot loop,
- Unrolling and vectorization,
- And even Closed Form substitution.
Unfortunately, it only applies to internal iteration. Despite various attempts at stream-lining the implementation of `next` and `next_back`, LLVM has stubbornly refused to optimize external iteration appropriately, leaving me with a choice between:
- The current implementation, for which Closed Form substitution is performed, but which uses 2 conditional jumps in the hot loop when optimization fail.
- An implementation using a `is_done` boolean, which uses 1 conditional jump in the hot loop when optimization fail, allowing unrolling and vectorization, but for which Closed Form substitution fails.
In the absence of any conclusive evidence as to which usecase matters most, and with no assurance that the lack of Closed Form substitution is not indicative of other optimizations being foiled, there is no way
to pick one implementation over the other, and thus I defer to the statu quo as far as `next` and `next_back` are concerned.
Add signed num::NonZeroI* types
Multiple people have asked for them in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49137. Given that the unsigned ones already exist, they are very easy to add and not an additional maintenance burden.
Multiple people have asked for them, in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49137.
Given that the unsigned ones already exist,
they are very easy to add and not an additional maintenance burden.
Add unstable Iterator::copied()
Initially suggested at https://github.com/bluss/rust-itertools/pull/289, however the maintainers of itertools suggested this may be better of in a standard library.
The intent of `copied` is to avoid accidentally cloning iterator elements after doing a code refactoring which causes a structure to be no longer `Copy`. This is a relatively common pattern, as it can be seen by calling `rg --pcre2 '[.]map[(][|](?:(\w+)[|] [*]\1|&(\w+)[|] \2)[)]'` on Rust main repository. Additionally, many uses of `cloned` actually want to simply `Copy`, and changing something to be no longer copyable may introduce unnoticeable performance penalty.
Also, this makes sense because the standard library includes `[T].copy_from_slice` to pair with `[T].clone_from_slice`.
This also adds `Option::copied`, because it makes sense to pair it with `Iterator::copied`. I don't think this feature is particularly important, but it makes sense to update `Option` along with `Iterator` for consistency.
rename div_euc -> div_euclid, and mod_euc -> rem_euclid
logic is written up in #49048
Also, update the documentation slightly.
cc @alexcrichton @clarcharr @varkor
Ever since we added a Cargo-based build system for the compiler the
standard library has always been a little special, it's never been able
to depend on crates.io crates for runtime dependencies. This has been a
result of various limitations, namely that Cargo doesn't understand that
crates from crates.io depend on libcore, so Cargo tries to build crates
before libcore is finished.
I had an idea this afternoon, however, which lifts the strategy
from #52919 to directly depend on crates.io crates from the standard
library. After all is said and done this removes a whopping three
submodules that we need to manage!
The basic idea here is that for any crate `std` depends on it adds an
*optional* dependency on an empty crate on crates.io, in this case named
`rustc-std-workspace-core`. This crate is overridden via `[patch]` in
this repository to point to a local crate we write, and *that* has a
`path` dependency on libcore.
Note that all `no_std` crates also depend on `compiler_builtins`, but if
we're not using submodules we can publish `compiler_builtins` to
crates.io and all crates can depend on it anyway! The basic strategy
then looks like:
* The standard library (or some transitive dep) decides to depend on a
crate `foo`.
* The standard library adds
```toml
[dependencies]
foo = { version = "0.1", features = ['rustc-dep-of-std'] }
```
* The crate `foo` has an optional dependency on `rustc-std-workspace-core`
* The crate `foo` has an optional dependency on `compiler_builtins`
* The crate `foo` has a feature `rustc-dep-of-std` which activates these
crates and any other necessary infrastructure in the crate.
A sample commit for `dlmalloc` [turns out to be quite simple][commit].
After that all `no_std` crates should largely build "as is" and still be
publishable on crates.io! Notably they should be able to continue to use
stable Rust if necessary, since the `rename-dependency` feature of Cargo
is soon stabilizing.
As a proof of concept, this commit removes the `dlmalloc`,
`libcompiler_builtins`, and `libc` submodules from this repository. Long
thorns in our side these are now gone for good and we can directly
depend on crates.io! It's hoped that in the long term we can bring in
other crates as necessary, but for now this is largely intended to
simply make it easier to manage these crates and remove submodules.
This should be a transparent non-breaking change for all users, but one
possible stickler is that this almost for sure breaks out-of-tree
`std`-building tools like `xargo` and `cargo-xbuild`. I think it should
be relatively easy to get them working, however, as all that's needed is
an entry in the `[patch]` section used to build the standard library.
Hopefully we can work with these tools to solve this problem!
[commit]: 28ee12db81
name old ns/iter new ns/iter diff ns/iter diff % speedup
iter::bench_cycle_take_ref_sum 927,152 927,194 42 0.00% x 1.00
iter::bench_cycle_take_sum 938,129 603,492 -334,637 -35.67% x 1.55
Revert #51601Closes: #55985
Specialization of `StepBy<Range(Inclusive)>` results in an incorrectly behaving code when `step_by` is combined with `skip` or `nth`.
If this will get merged we probably should reopen issues previously closed by #51601 (if there was any).
