Move as many tests from tests/ui/numbers-arithmetic to tests/ui/lint as possible
Fixes#119851 , and also consolidates as many individual tests as possible from numbers-arithmetic. I might have moved the tests in too aggressively, so let me know
Provide suggestions through `rustc_confusables` annotations
Help with common API confusion, like asking for `push` when the data structure really has `append`.
```
error[E0599]: no method named `size` found for struct `Vec<{integer}>` in the current scope
--> $DIR/rustc_confusables_std_cases.rs:17:7
|
LL | x.size();
| ^^^^
|
help: you might have meant to use `len`
|
LL | x.len();
| ~~~
help: there is a method with a similar name
|
LL | x.resize();
| ~~~~~~
```
Fix#59450 (we can open subsequent tickets for specific cases).
Fix#108437:
```
error[E0599]: `Option<{integer}>` is not an iterator
--> f101.rs:3:9
|
3 | opt.flat_map(|val| Some(val));
| ^^^^^^^^ `Option<{integer}>` is not an iterator
|
::: /home/gh-estebank/rust/library/core/src/option.rs:571:1
|
571 | pub enum Option<T> {
| ------------------ doesn't satisfy `Option<{integer}>: Iterator`
|
= note: the following trait bounds were not satisfied:
`Option<{integer}>: Iterator`
which is required by `&mut Option<{integer}>: Iterator`
help: you might have meant to use `and_then`
|
3 | opt.and_then(|val| Some(val));
| ~~~~~~~~
```
On type error of method call arguments, look at confusables for suggestion. Fix#87212:
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> f101.rs:8:18
|
8 | stuff.append(Thing);
| ------ ^^^^^ expected `&mut Vec<Thing>`, found `Thing`
| |
| arguments to this method are incorrect
|
= note: expected mutable reference `&mut Vec<Thing>`
found struct `Thing`
note: method defined here
--> /home/gh-estebank/rust/library/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs:2025:12
|
2025 | pub fn append(&mut self, other: &mut Self) {
| ^^^^^^
help: you might have meant to use `push`
|
8 | stuff.push(Thing);
| ~~~~
```
remove `sub_relations` from the `InferCtxt`
While doing so, I tried to remove the `delay_span_bug` in `rematch_impl` again, which lead me to discover another `freshen` bug, fixing that one in the second commit. See commit descriptions for the reasoning behind each change.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #120598 (No need to `validate_alias_bound_self_from_param_env` in `assemble_alias_bound_candidates`)
- #121386 (test that we do not support higher-ranked regions in opaque type inference)
- #121393 (match lowering: Introduce a `TestCase` enum to replace most matching on `PatKind`)
- #121401 (Fix typo in serialized.rs)
- #121427 (Fix panic when compiling `Rocket`.)
- #121439 (Fix typo in metadata.rs doc comment)
- #121441 (`DefId` to `LocalDefId`)
- #121452 (Add new maintainers to nto-qnx.md)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Do not provide a structured suggestion when the arguments don't match.
```
error[E0599]: no method named `test_mut` found for struct `Vec<{integer}>` in the current scope
--> $DIR/auto-ref-slice-plus-ref.rs:7:7
|
LL | a.test_mut();
| ^^^^^^^^
|
= help: items from traits can only be used if the trait is implemented and in scope
note: `MyIter` defines an item `test_mut`, perhaps you need to implement it
--> $DIR/auto-ref-slice-plus-ref.rs:14:1
|
LL | trait MyIter {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: there is a method `get_mut` with a similar name, but with different arguments
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/slice/mod.rs:LL:COL
```
Consider methods beyond inherent ones when suggesting typos.
```
error[E0599]: no method named `owned` found for reference `&dyn Foo` in the current scope
--> $DIR/object-pointer-types.rs:11:7
|
LL | fn owned(self: Box<Self>);
| --------- the method might not be found because of this arbitrary self type
...
LL | x.owned();
| ^^^^^ help: there is a method with a similar name: `to_owned`
```
Fix#101013.
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/rustc_confusables_std_cases.rs:20:14
|
LL | x.append(42);
| ------ ^^ expected `&mut Vec<{integer}>`, found integer
| |
| arguments to this method are incorrect
|
= note: expected mutable reference `&mut Vec<{integer}>`
found type `{integer}`
note: method defined here
--> $SRC_DIR/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs:LL:COL
help: you might have meant to use `push`
|
LL | x.push(42);
| ~~~~
```
Help with common API confusion, like asking for `push` when the data structure really has `append`.
```
error[E0599]: no method named `size` found for struct `Vec<{integer}>` in the current scope
--> $DIR/rustc_confusables_std_cases.rs:17:7
|
LL | x.size();
| ^^^^
|
help: you might have meant to use `len`
|
LL | x.len();
| ~~~
help: there is a method with a similar name
|
LL | x.resize();
| ~~~~~~
```
#59450
No need to `validate_alias_bound_self_from_param_env` in `assemble_alias_bound_candidates`
We already fully normalize the self type before we reach `assemble_alias_bound_candidates`, so there's no reason to double check that a projection is truly rigid by checking param-env bounds.
I think this is also blocked on us making sure to always normalize opaques: #120549.
r? lcnr
Without doing so we use the same candidate cache entry
for `?0: Trait<?1>` and `?0: Trait<?0>`. These goals are different
and we must not use the same entry for them.
we don't track them when canonicalizing or when freshening,
resulting in instable caching in the old solver, and issues when
instantiating query responses in the new one.
Improve codegen diagnostic handling
Clarify the workings of the temporary `Diagnostic` type used to send diagnostics from codegen threads to the main thread.
r? `@estebank`
intrinsics::simd: add missing functions, avoid UB-triggering fast-math
Turns out stdarch declares a bunch more SIMD intrinsics that are still missing from libcore.
I hope I got the docs and in particular the safety requirements right for these "unordered" and "nanless" intrinsics.
Many of these are unused even in stdarch, but they are implemented in the codegen backend, so we may as well list them here.
r? `@Amanieu`
Cc `@calebzulawski` `@workingjubilee`
- Make it more closely match `rustc_errors::Diagnostic`, by making the
field names match, and adding `children`, which requires adding
`rustc_codegen_ssa:🔙:write::Subdiagnostic`.
- Check that we aren't missing important info when converting
diagnostics.
- Add better comments.
- Tweak `rustc_errors::Diagnostic::replace_args` so that we don't need
to do any cloning when converting diagnostics.
coverage: Remove `pending_dups` from the span refiner
When extracting coverage spans from a function's MIR, we need to decide how to handle spans that are associated with more than one node (BCB) in the coverage control flow graph.
The existing code for managing those duplicate spans is very subtle and difficult to modify. But by eagerly deduplicating those extracted spans in a much simpler way, we can remove a massive chunk of complexity from the span refiner.
There is a tradeoff here, in that we no longer try to retain *all* nondominating BCBs that have the same span, only the last one in the (semi-arbitrary) dominance ordering. But in practice, this produces very little difference in our coverage tests, and the simplification is so significant that I think it's worthwhile.
``@rustbot`` label +A-code-coverage
rename ptr::invalid -> ptr::without_provenance
It has long bothered me that `ptr::invalid` returns a pointer that is actually valid for zero-sized memory accesses. In general, it doesn't even make sense to ask "is this pointer valid", you have to ask "is this pointer valid for a given memory access". We could say that a pointer is invalid if it is not valid for *any* memory access, but [the way this FCP is going](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/472), it looks like *all* pointers will be valid for zero-sized memory accesses.
Two possible alternative names emerged as people's favorites:
1. Something involving `dangling`, in analogy to `NonNull::dangling`. To avoid inconsistency with the `NonNull` method, the address-taking method could be called `dangling_at(addr: usize) -> *const T`.
2. `without_provenance`, to be symmetric with the inverse operation `ptr.addr_without_provenance()` (currently still called `ptr.addr()` but probably going to be renamed)
I have no idea which one of these is better. I read [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117658#issuecomment-1830934701) as expressing a slight preference for something like the second option, so I went for that. I'm happy to go with `dangling_at` as well.
Cc `@rust-lang/opsem`
Currently `emit_stashed_diagnostic` is called from four(!) different
places: `print_error_count`, `DiagCtxtInner::drop`, `abort_if_errors`,
and `compile_status`.
And `flush_delayed` is called from two different places:
`DiagCtxtInner::drop` and `Queries`.
This is pretty gross! Each one should really be called from a single
place, but there's a bunch of entanglements. This commit cleans up this
mess.
Specifically, it:
- Removes all the existing calls to `emit_stashed_diagnostic`, and adds
a single new call in `finish_diagnostics`.
- Removes the early `flush_delayed` call in `codegen_and_build_linker`,
replacing it with a simple early return if delayed bugs are present.
- Changes `DiagCtxtInner::drop` and `DiagCtxtInner::flush_delayed` so
they both assert that the stashed diagnostics are empty (i.e.
processed beforehand).
- Changes `interface::run_compiler` so that any errors emitted during
`finish_diagnostics` (i.e. late-emitted stashed diagnostics) are
counted and cannot be overlooked. This requires adding
`ErrorGuaranteed` return values to several functions.
- Removes the `stashed_err_count` call in `analysis`. This is possible
now that we don't have to worry about calling `flush_delayed` early
from `codegen_and_build_linker` when stashed diagnostics are pending.
- Changes the `span_bug` case in `handle_tuple_field_pattern_match` to a
`delayed_span_bug`, because it now can be reached due to the removal
of the `stashed_err_count` call in `analysis`.
- Slightly changes the expected output of three tests. If no errors are
emitted but there are delayed bugs, the error count is no longer
printed. This is because delayed bugs are now always printed after the
error count is printed (or not printed, if the error count is zero).
There is a lot going on in this commit. It's hard to break into smaller
pieces because the existing code is very tangled. It took me a long time
and a lot of effort to understand how the different pieces interact, and
I think the new code is a lot simpler and easier to understand.
Remove `diagnostic_builder.rs`
#120576 moved a big chunk of `DiagnosticBuilder`'s functionality out of `diagnostic_builder.rs` into `diagnostic.rs`, which left `DiagnosticBuilder` spread across the two files.
This PR fixes that messiness by merging what remains of `diagnostic_builder.rs` into `diagnostic.rs`.
This is part of https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/722.
r? `@davidtwco`
compiletest: support auxiliaries with auxiliaries
To test behaviour that depends on the extern options of intermediate crates, compiletest auxiliaries must have their own auxiliaries.
Auxiliary compilation previously did not trigger compilation of any auxiliaries in the auxiliary's headers. In addition, those auxiliaries would need to be in an `auxiliary/auxiliary` directory, which is unnecessary and makes some crate graphs harder to write tests for, such as when A depends on B and C, and B depends on C.
For a test `tests/ui/$path/root.rs`, with the following crate graph:
```
root
|-- grandparent
`-- parent
`-- grandparent
```
then the intermediate outputs from compiletest will be:
```
build/$target/test/ui/$path/
|-- auxiliary
| |-- libgrandparent.dylib
| |-- libparent.dylib
| |-- grandparent
| | |-- grandparent.err
| | `-- grandparent.out
| `-- parent
| |-- parent.err
| `-- parent.out
|-- libroot.rmeta
|-- root.err
`-- root.out
```
Support async trait bounds in macros
r? fmease
This is similar to your work on const trait bounds. This theoretically regresses `impl async $ident:ident` in macros, but I doubt this is occurring in practice.
To test behaviour that depends on the extern options of intermediate
crates, compiletest auxiliaries must have their own auxiliaries.
Auxiliary compilation previously did not trigger compilation of any
auxiliaries in the auxiliary's headers. In addition, those auxiliaries
would need to be in an `auxiliary/auxiliary` directory, which is
unnecessary and makes some crate graphs harder to write tests for,
such as when A depends on B and C, and B depends on C.
For a test `tests/ui/$path/root.rs`, with the following crate graph:
```
root
|-- grandparent
`-- parent
`-- grandparent
```
then the intermediate outputs from compiletest will be:
```
build/$target/test/ui/$path/
|-- auxiliary
| |-- libgrandparent.dylib
| |-- libparent.dylib
| |-- grandparent
| | |-- grandparent.err
| | `-- grandparent.out
| `-- parent
| |-- parent.err
| `-- parent.out
|-- libroot.rmeta
|-- root.err
`-- root.out
```
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
