Current access methods are nestable and unsafe. This patch renames
current methods implementation - prepends unsafe_ - and implements 2 new
methods that are both safe and un-nestable.
Fixes#7473
Current access methods are nestable and unsafe. This patch renames
current methods implementation - prepends unsafe_ - and implements 2 new
methods that are both safe and un-nestable.
Fixes#7473
Significant progress on #6875, enough that I'll open new bugs and turn that into a metabug when this lands.
Description & example in the commit message.
There are 6 new compiler recognised attributes: deprecated, experimental,
unstable, stable, frozen, locked (these levels are taken directly from
Node's "stability index"[1]). These indicate the stability of the
item to which they are attached; e.g. `#[deprecated] fn foo() { .. }`
says that `foo` is deprecated.
This comes with 3 lints for the first 3 levels (with matching names) that
will detect the use of items marked with them (the `unstable` lint
includes items with no stability attribute). The attributes can be given
a short text note that will be displayed by the lint. An example:
#[warn(unstable)]; // `allow` by default
#[deprecated="use `bar`"]
fn foo() { }
#[stable]
fn bar() { }
fn baz() { }
fn main() {
foo(); // "warning: use of deprecated item: use `bar`"
bar(); // all fine
baz(); // "warning: use of unmarked item"
}
The lints currently only check the "edges" of the AST: i.e. functions,
methods[2], structs and enum variants. Any stability attributes on modules,
enums, traits and impls are not checked.
[1]: http://nodejs.org/api/documentation.html
[2]: the method check is currently incorrect and doesn't work.
Fix#8468. (Though the right answer in the end, as noted on the dialogue on the ticket, might be to just require trait methods to name their parameters, regardless of whether they have a default method implementation or not.)
As with the previous commit, this is targeted at removing the possibility of
collisions between statics. The main use case here is when there's a
type-parametric function with an inner static that's compiled as a library.
Before this commit, any impl would generate a path item of "__extensions__".
This changes this identifier to be a "pretty name", which is either the last
element of the path of the trait implemented or the last element of the type's
path that's being implemented. That doesn't quite cut it though, so the (trait,
type) pair is hashed and again used to append information to the symbol.
Essentially, __extensions__ was removed for something nicer for debugging, and
then some more information was added to symbol name by including a hash of the
trait being implemented and type it's being implemented for. This should prevent
colliding names for inner statics in regular functions with similar names.
Before, the path name for all items defined in methods of traits and impls never
took into account the name of the method. This meant that if you had two statics
of the same name in two different methods the statics would end up having the
same symbol named (even after mangling) because the path components leading to
the symbol were exactly the same (just __extensions__ and the static name).
It turns out that if you add the symbol "A" twice to LLVM, it automatically
makes the second one "A1" instead of "A". What this meant is that in local crate
compilations we never found this bug. Even across crates, this was never a
problem. The problem arises when you have generic methods that don't get
generated at compile-time of a library. If the statics were re-added to LLVM by
a client crate of a library in a different order, you would reference different
constants (the integer suffixes wouldn't be guaranteed to be the same).
This fixes the problem by adding the method name to symbol path when building
the ast_map. In doing so, two symbols in two different methods are disambiguated
against.
r? @brson
@metajack requested the ability to violate the "only workspaces can be in the RUST_PATH" rule for the purpose of bootstrapping Servo without having to restructure all the directories. This patch gives rustpkg the ability to find sources if a directory in the RUST_PATH directly contains one of rustpkg's "special" files (lib.rs, main.rs, bench.rs, or test.rs), even if it's not a workspace. In this case, it puts the build artifacts in the first workspace in the RUST_PATH.
I'm not sure whether or not it's a good idea to keep this feature in rustpkg permanently. Thus, I added a flag, ```--use-rust-path-hack```, and only enabled it when the flag is set.
The only user-facing change is handling non-integer (and zero) `RUST_THREADS` more nicely:
```
$ RUST_THREADS=x rustc # old
You've met with a terrible fate, haven't you?
fatal runtime error: runtime tls key not initialized
Aborted
$ RUST_THREADS=x ./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/bin/rustc # new
You've met with a terrible fate, haven't you?
fatal runtime error: `RUST_THREADS` is `x`, should be a positive integer
Aborted
```
The other changes are converting some `for .. in range(x,y)` to `vec::from_fn` or `for .. in x.iter()` as appropriate; and removing a chain of (seemingly) unnecessary pointer casts.
(Also, fixes a typo in `extra::test` from #8823.)
Whenever a generic function was encountered, only the top-level items were
recursed upon, even though the function could contain items inside blocks or
nested inside of other expressions. This fixes the existing code from traversing
just the top level items to using a Visitor to deeply recurse and find any items
which need to be translated.
This was uncovered when building code with --lib, because the encode_symbol
function would panic once it found that an item hadn't been translated.
Closes#8134
Whenever a generic function was encountered, only the top-level items were
recursed upon, even though the function could contain items inside blocks or
nested inside of other expressions. This fixes the existing code from traversing
just the top level items to using a Visitor to deeply recurse and find any items
which need to be translated.
This was uncovered when building code with --lib, because the encode_symbol
function would panic once it found that an item hadn't been translated.
Closes#8134
This should make benchmarks easier to understand. But, it doesn't work.
BENCH_RS in mk/tests.mk has everything, from what I can tell in remake, but
only those that are direct children of src/test/bench get build and run.
@graydon, can you lend your expertise? I can't make heads or tails of this
makefile.
