When using a `do` block to call an internal iterator, if you forgot to
return a value from the body, it would tell you
error: Do-block body must return bool, but returns () here. Perhaps
you meant to write a `for`-loop?
This advice no longer applies as `for` loops are now for external
iterators. Delete this message outright and let it use the default error
message
error: mismatched types: expected `bool` but found `()`
This allows the internal implementation details of the TLS keys to be
changed without requiring the update of all the users. (Or, applying
changes that *have* to be applied for the keys to work correctly, e.g.
forcing LLVM to not merge these constants.)
This allows the internal implementation details of the TLS keys to be
changed without requiring the update of all the users. (Or, applying
changes that have to be applied for the keys to work correctly, e.g.
forcing LLVM to not merge these constants.)
When parsing a trait function, the function must end with either `;` or
`{` (signifying a default implementation). The error message incorrectly
stated that it must be `;` or `}`.
Fixes#6610.
Pointers to bound variables shouldn't be stored before checking pattern,
otherwise piped patterns can conflict with each other (issue #6338).
Closes#6338.
.with_c_str() is a replacement for the old .as_c_str(), to avoid
unnecessary boilerplate.
Replace all usages of .to_c_str().with_ref() with .with_c_str().
The type of the result of option_env! was not fully specified in the
None case, leading to type check failures in the case where the variable
was not defined (e.g. option_env!("FOO").is_none()).
Also cleaned up some compilation warnings.
While looking over the code for object coercion, I realized that it wasn't quite handling freezing and reborrowing correctly. Tweak the code, adding tests for the relevant cases.
r? @pcwalton
This includes a number of improvements to `ifmt!`
* Implements formatting arguments -- `{:0.5x}` works now
* Formatting now works on all integer widths, not just `int` and `uint`
* Added a large doc block to `std::fmt` which should help explain what `ifmt!` is all about
* Added floating point formatters, although they have the same pitfalls from before (they're just proof-of-concept now)
Closed a couple of issues along the way, yay! Once this gets into a snapshot, I'll start looking into removing all of `fmt`
This pull request re-implements handling of visibility scopes and source code positions in debug info. It should now be very stable and properly handle
+ variable shadowing
+ expanded code (macros and the new for-loop de-sugaring, for example)
+ variables in the middle of nested scopes
+ bindings declared in the head of match statement arms.
all of which did not work at all or did not work reliably before. Those interested in a more detailed description of the problems at hand, I kindly refer to http://michaelwoerister.github.io/2013/08/03/visibility-scopes.html
Why doesn't the `populate_scope_map()` function use `syntax::visit`?
Because it would not improve this particular AST walker (see: 69dc790849 (commitcomment-3781426))
Cheers,
Michael
Fix#3192. r? anyone
There are 4 different new tests, to check some different scenarios for
what the parse context is at the time of recovery, becasue our
compile-fail infrastructure does not appear to handle verifying
error-recovery situations.
Differentiate between unit-like struct definition item and unit-like
struct construction in the error message.
----
More generally, outlines a more generic strategy for parse error
recovery: By committing to an expression/statement at set points in
the parser, we can then do some look-ahead to catch common mistakes
and skip over them.
One detail about this strategy is that you want to avoid emitting the
"helpful" message unless the input is reasonably close to the case of
interest. (E.g. do not warn about a potential unit struct for an
input of the form `let hmm = do foo { } { };`)
To accomplish this, I added (partial) last_token tracking; used for
`commit_stmt` support.
The check_for_erroneous_unit_struct_expecting fn returns bool to
signal whether it "made progress"; currently unused; this is meant for
use to compose several such recovery checks together in a loop.
