Multiple duplicate assignments of the same discriminant are now reported
in the samme error. We now point out the incrementation start point for
discriminants that are not explicitly assigned that are also duplicates.
Removed old test related to E0081 that is now covered by error-codes/E0081.rs.
Also refactored parts of the `check_enum` function.
Previously whenever a duplicate discriminant was detected for an Enum,
we would print the discriminant bits in the diagnostic without any
casting. This caused us to display incorrect values for negative
discriminants. After this PR we format the discriminant signedness
correctly. Also reworded some of the original error
messages.
Add 'consider using' message to overflowing_literals
Fixes#79744.
Ironically, the `overflowing_literals` handler for binary or hex already
had this message! You would think it would be the other way around :)
cc ```@scottmcm```
make non_camel_case_types an early lint
This allows us to catch these kinds of style violations much earlier, as evidenced by the large number of tests that had to be updated for this change.
Weirdly, we were deciding between a help note and a structured
suggestion based on whether the import candidate span was a dummy—but
we weren't using that span in any case! The dummy-ness of the span
(which appears to be a matter of this-crate vs. other-crate
definition) isn't the right criterion by which we should decide
whether it's germane to mention that "there is an enum variant";
instead, let's use the someness of `def` (which is used as the
`has_unexpected_resolution` argument to `error_code`).
Since `import_candidate_to_paths` has no other callers, we are free to
stop returning the span and rename the function. By using
`span_suggestions_`, we leverage the max-suggestions output limit
already built in to the emitter, thus resolving #56028.
In the matter of message wording, "you can" is redundant (and perhaps
too informal); prefer the imperative.
