In preparation for upcoming changes to the `Writer` trait (soon to be called
`Write`) this commit renames the current `write` method to `write_all` to match
the semantics of the upcoming `write_all` method. The `write` method will be
repurposed to return a `usize` indicating how much data was written which
differs from the current `write` semantics. In order to head off as much
unintended breakage as possible, the method is being deprecated now in favor of
a new name.
[breaking-change]
In preparation for the I/O rejuvination of the standard library, this commit
renames the current `io` module to `old_io` in order to make room for the new
I/O modules. It is expected that the I/O RFCs will land incrementally over time
instead of all at once, and this provides a fresh clean path for new modules to
enter into as well as guaranteeing that all old infrastructure will remain in
place for some time.
As each `old_io` module is replaced it will be deprecated in-place for new
structures in `std::{io, fs, net}` (as appropriate).
This commit does *not* leave a reexport of `old_io as io` as the deprecation
lint does not currently warn on this form of use. This is quite a large breaking
change for all imports in existing code, but all functionality is retained
precisely as-is and path statements simply need to be renamed from `io` to
`old_io`.
[breaking-change]
There are some explicit Send/Sync implementations for Window's types
that don't exist in Unix. While the end result will be the same, I
believe it's clearer if we keep the explicit implementations consistent
by making the os-specific types Send/Sync where needed and possible.
This commit addresses tcp. Existing differences below:
src/libstd/sys/unix/tcp.rs
unsafe impl Sync for TcpListener {}
unsafe impl Sync for AcceptorInner {}
src/libstd/sys/windows/tcp.rs
unsafe impl Send for Event {}
unsafe impl Sync for Event {}
unsafe impl Send for TcpListener {}
unsafe impl Sync for TcpListener {}
unsafe impl Send for TcpAcceptor {}
unsafe impl Sync for TcpAcceptor {}
unsafe impl Send for AcceptorInner {}
unsafe impl Sync for AcceptorInner {}
There are some explicit Send/Sync implementations for Window's types
that don't exist in Unix. While the end result will be the same, I
believe it's clearer if we keep the explicit implementations consistent
by making the os-specific types Send/Sync where needed and possible.
This commit addresses pipe
src/libstd/sys/unix/pipe.rs
unsafe impl Send for UnixListener {}
unsafe impl Sync for UnixListener {}
src/libstd/sys/windows/pipe.rs
unsafe impl Send for UnixStream {}
unsafe impl Sync for UnixStream {}
unsafe impl Send for UnixListener {}
unsafe impl Sync for UnixListener {}
unsafe impl Send for UnixAcceptor {}
unsafe impl Sync for UnixAcceptor {}
unsafe impl Send for AcceptorState {}
unsafe impl Sync for AcceptorState {}
This commit relaxes the bound on `Result::unwrap` and `Result::unwrap_err` from
the `Display` trait to the `Debug` trait for generating an error message about
the unwrapping operation.
This commit is a breaking change and any breakage should be mitigated by
ensuring that `Debug` is implemented on the relevant type.
[breaking-change]
Per [RFC 517](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/575/), this commit
introduces platform-native strings. The API is essentially as described
in the RFC.
The WTF-8 implementation is adapted from @SimonSapin's
[implementation](https://github.com/SimonSapin/rust-wtf8). To make this
work, some encodign and decoding functionality in `libcore` is now
exported in a "raw" fashion reusable for WTF-8. These exports are *not*
reexported in `std`, nor are they stable.
This commit relaxes the bound on `Result::unwrap` and `Result::unwrap_err` from
the `Display` trait to the `Debug` trait for generating an error message about
the unwrapping operation.
This commit is a breaking change and any breakage should be mitigated by
ensuring that `Debug` is implemented on the relevant type.
[breaking-change]
Previous wording wasn’t clear about its actual behaviour. It could be
interpreted as answering either:
* Can current thread panic?
* Is current thread unwinding because of panic?
r? @steveklabnik
Not sure on what *exactly* should be said here, but I think this is the most important bit. This PR also establishes conventions for describing performance minimally.
I suggest to describe preformance for individual methods we use a `# Performance` heading. Not sure if we should have
```
# Performance: O(1)
details details
```
or
```
# Performance:
O(1)
details details
```
Since I think most methods don't need discussion, the former seems more resonable. But it's kind of weird to have info "in" the heading.
r? @steveklabnik
