The callbacks have precisely two states: the default, and the one
present throughout almost all of the rustc run (the filled in value
which has access to TyCtxt).
We used to store this as a thread local, and reset it on each thread to
the non-default value. But this is somewhat wasteful, since there is no
reason to set it globally -- while the callbacks themselves access TLS,
they do not do so in a manner that fails in when we do not have TLS to
work with.
`description` has been documented as soft-deprecated since 1.27.0 (17
months ago). There is no longer any reason to call it or implement it.
This commit:
- adds #[rustc_deprecated(since = "1.41.0")] to Error::description;
- moves description (and cause, which is also deprecated) below the
source and backtrace methods in the Error trait;
- reduces documentation of description and cause to take up much less
vertical real estate in rustdocs, while preserving the example that
shows how to render errors without needing to call description;
- removes the description function of all *currently unstable* Error
impls in the standard library;
- marks #[allow(deprecated)] the description function of all *stable*
Error impls in the standard library;
- replaces miscellaneous uses of description in example code and the
compiler.
Aggregation of drive-by cosmetic changes for trait-upcasting PR
Cherry-picked from #60900.
As requested by @Centril (and @nikomatsakis, I believe).
r? @Centril
Add outlives suggestions for some lifetime errors
This PR implements suggestion diagnostics for some lifetime mismatch errors. When the borrow checker finds that some lifetime 'a doesn't outlive some other lifetime 'b that it should outlive, then in addition to the current lifetime error, we also emit a suggestion for how to fix the problem by adding a bound:
- If a and b are normal named regions, suggest to add the bound `'a: 'b`
- If b is static, suggest to replace a with static
- If b also needs to outlive a, they must be the same, so suggest unifying them
We start with a simpler implementation that avoids diagnostic regression or implementation complexity:
- We only makes suggestions for lifetimes the user can already name (eg not closure regions or elided regions)
- For now, we only emit a help note, not an actually suggestion because it is significantly easier.
Finally, there is one hack: it seems that implicit regions in async fn are given the name '_ incorrectly. To avoid suggesting '_: 'x, we simply filter out such lifetimes by name.
For more info, see this internals thread:
https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/mechanical-suggestions-for-some-borrow-checker-errors/9049/3
TL;DR Make suggestions to add a `where 'a: 'b` constraint for some lifetime errors. Details are in the paper linked from the internals thread above.
r? @estebank
TODO
- [x] Clean up code
- [x] Only make idiomatic suggestions
- [x] don't suggest naming `&'a self`
- [x] rather than `'a: 'static`, suggest replacing `'a` with `'static`
- [x] rather than `'a: 'b, 'b: 'a`, suggest replacing `'a` with `'b` or vice versa
- [x] Performance (maybe need a perf run when this is closer to the finish line?)
- perf run was clean...
- EDIT: perf run seems to only check non-error performance... How do we check that error performance didn't regress?
- [x] Needs ui tests
- [x] Integrate the `help` message into the main lifetime `error`
SourceMap is now in the root of all rustc-specific crates, syntax_pos,
so there's no need for the trait object to decouple the dependencies
between librustc_errors and libsyntax as was needed previously.
This is a bit unfortunate, but code needs to be able to fatally error
early on (in particular, syntax_pos after we move SourceMap there). It's
also a tiny bit of code, which means it's ultimately not that bad.
Remove a loop which runs exactly once
Though the code seems to work properly, it is worth removing the loop entirely in order to not confuse the reader.
r? @estebank
Don't hide ICEs from previous incremental compiles
I think this fixes#65401, the compiler does not fail to ICE after the first compilation, tested on the last snippet of [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/63154#issuecomment-541592381).
I am not very sure of the fix as I don't understand much of the structure of the compiler.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/64272 replaced
`DiagnosticBuilder` with `Diagnostic` in some places. This commit just
renames the DB variable from `db` to `diag` where it wasn't renamed.
