Improve search result tab handling
Fixes#80378.
If the current search result tab is empty, it picks the first non-empty one. If all are empty, the current one doesn't change. It can be tested with "-> string" (where only the "returned elements" tab is not empty).
r? `@jyn514`
Fix `unused_unsafe` label with `unsafe_block_in_unsafe_fn
Previously, the following code:
```rust
#![feature(unsafe_block_in_unsafe_fn)]
unsafe fn foo() {
unsafe { unsf() }
}
unsafe fn unsf() {}
```
Would give the following warning:
```
warning: unnecessary `unsafe` block
--> src/lib.rs:4:5
|
4 | unsafe { unsf() }
| ^^^^^^ unnecessary `unsafe` block
|
= note: `#[warn(unused_unsafe)]` on by default
```
which doesn't point out that the block is in an `unsafe fn`.
Tracking issue: #71668
cc #79208
don't suggest erroneous trailing comma after `..`
In #76612, suggestions were added for missing fields in patterns. However, the suggestions are being inserted just at the end
of the last field in the pattern—before any trailing comma after the last field. This resulted in the "if you don't care about missing fields" suggestion to recommend code with a trailing comma after the field ellipsis (`..,`), which is actually not legal ("`..` must be at the end and cannot have a trailing comma")!
Incidentally, the doc-comment on `error_unmentioned_fields` was using `you_cant_use_this_field` as an example field name (presumably copy-paste inherited from the description of Issue #76077), but the present author found this confusing, because unmentioned fields aren't necessarily unusable.
The suggested code in the diff this commit introduces to `destructuring-assignment/struct_destructure_fail.stderr` doesn't work, but it didn't work beforehand, either (because of the "found reserved identifier `_`" thing), so you can't really call it a regression; it could be fixed in a separate PR.
Resolves#78511.
r? `@davidtwco` or `@estebank`
Stability oddity with const intrinsics
cc `@RalfJung`
In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80699#discussion_r551495670 `@usbalbin` realized we accepted some intrinsics as `const` without a `#[rustc_const_(un)stable]` attribute. I did some digging, and that example works because intrinsics inherit their stability from their parents... including `#[rustc_const_(un)stable]` attributes. While we may want to fix that (not sure, wasn't there just a MCPed PR that caused this on purpose?), we definitely want tests for it, thus this PR adding tests and some fun tracing statements.
Don't use posix_spawn_file_actions_addchdir_np on macOS.
There is a bug on macOS where using `posix_spawn_file_actions_addchdir_np` with a relative executable path will cause `posix_spawnp` to return ENOENT, even though it successfully spawned the process in the given directory.
`posix_spawn_file_actions_addchdir_np` was introduced in macOS 10.15 first released in Oct 2019. I have tested macOS 10.15.7 and 11.0.1.
Example offending program:
```rust
use std::fs;
use std::os::unix::fs::PermissionsExt;
use std::process::*;
fn main() {
fs::create_dir_all("bar").unwrap();
fs::create_dir_all("foo").unwrap();
fs::write("foo/foo.sh", "#!/bin/sh\necho hello ${PWD}\n").unwrap();
let perms = fs::Permissions::from_mode(0o755);
fs::set_permissions("foo/foo.sh", perms).unwrap();
let c = Command::new("../foo/foo.sh").current_dir("bar").spawn();
eprintln!("{:?}", c);
}
```
This prints:
```
Err(Os { code: 2, kind: NotFound, message: "No such file or directory" })
hello /Users/eric/Temp/bar
```
I wanted to open this PR to get some feedback on possible solutions. Alternatives:
* Do nothing.
* Document the bug.
* Try to detect if the executable is a relative path on macOS, and avoid using `posix_spawn_file_actions_addchdir_np` only in that case.
I looked at the [XNU source code](https://opensource.apple.com/source/xnu/xnu-6153.141.1/bsd/kern/kern_exec.c.auto.html), but I didn't see anything obvious that would explain the behavior. The actual chdir succeeds, it is something else further down that fails, but I couldn't see where.
EDIT: I forgot to mention, relative exe paths with `current_dir` in general are discouraged (see #37868). I don't know if #37868 is fixable, since normalizing it would change the semantics for some platforms. Another option is to convert the executable to an absolute path with something like joining the cwd with the new cwd and the executable, but I'm uncertain about that.
Don't make tools responsible for checking unknown and renamed lints
Previously, clippy (and any other tool emitting lints) had to have their
own separate UNKNOWN_LINTS pass, because the compiler assumed any tool
lint could be valid. Now, as long as any lint starting with the tool
prefix exists, the compiler will warn when an unknown lint is present.
This may interact with the unstable `tool_lint` feature, which I don't entirely understand, but it will take the burden off those external tools to add their own lint pass, which seems like a step in the right direction to me.
- Don't mark `ineffective_unstable_trait_impl` as an internal lint
- Use clippy's more advanced lint suggestions
- Deprecate the `UNKNOWN_CLIPPY_LINTS` pass (and make it a no-op)
- Say 'unknown lint `clippy::x`' instead of 'unknown lint x'
This is tested by existing clippy tests. When https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80527 merges, it will also be tested in rustdoc tests. AFAIK there is no way to test this with rustc directly.
Force vec![] to expression position only
r? `@oli-obk`
I went with the lazy way of only changing what broke. I moved the test to ui/macros because the diagnostics no longer give suggestions.
Closes#61933
Support non-stage0 check
Seems to work locally - a full stage 1 check succeeds, building std (because we can't get away with checking it), and then checking the compiler and other tools. This ran into the problem that a unconditional x.py check in stage 1 *both* checks and builds stage 1 std, and then has to clean up because for some reason the rmeta and rlib artifacts conflict (though I'm not actually entirely sure why, but it doesn't seem worth digging in in too much detail).
Ideally we wouldn't be building and checking like that but it's a minor worry as checking std is pretty fast and you can avoid it if you're aiming for speed by passing the compiler (e.g., compiler/rustc) explicitly.
r? ```@jyn514```
Allow downloading LLVM on Windows and MacOS
- Don't ignore packaging `llvm/lib/` for `rust-dev` when LLVM is linked
statically
- Add `link-type.txt` so bootstrap knows whether llvm was linked
statically or dynamically
- Don't assume CI LLVM is linked dynamically in `bootstrap::config`
- Fall back to dynamic linking if `link-type.txt` doesn't exist
- Fix existing bug that split the output of `llvm-config` on lines, not spaces
- Only special case MacOS when dynamic linking. Static linking works fine.
- Enable building LLVM tests
This works around the following llvm bug:
```
llvm-config: error: component libraries and shared library
llvm-config: error: missing: /home/joshua/rustc2/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/llvm/build/lib/libgtest.a
llvm-config: error: missing: /home/joshua/rustc2/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/llvm/build/lib/libgtest_main.a
llvm-config: error: missing: /home/joshua/rustc2/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/llvm/build/lib/libLLVMTestingSupport.a
thread 'main' panicked at 'command did not execute successfully: "/home/joshua/rustc2/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/llvm/build/bin/llvm-config" "--libfiles"
```
I'm not sure why llvm-config thinks these are required, but to avoid
the error, this builds them anyway.
- Bump version of `download-ci-llvm-stamp`
`src/llvm-project` hasn't changed, but the generated tarball has.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/77084.
# Current Status
This works on both MacOS and Windows! 🎉🎉 Thanks to ```@nagisa,``` ```@halkcyon,``` ```@Lokathor,``` ```@jryans,``` and ```@poliorcetics``` for helping me test!
The `if-available` check now supports all tier 1 platforms. Although only x64 apple and x64 msvc have been tested, none of the changes here are Windows or Mac specific, and I expect this to work anywhere that LLVM artifacts are uploaded to CI (i.e. the `rust-dev` component exists).
## Windows
Note that if you have an old version of MSVC build tools you'll need to update them. VS Build Tools 2019 14.28 and later are known to work. With old tools, you may see an error like the following:
```
error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp___std_init_once_complete
```
resolve: Simplify collection of traits in scope
"Traits in scope" for a given location are collected by walking all scopes in type namespace, collecting traits in them and pruning traits that don't have an associated item with the given name and namespace.
Previously we tried to prune traits using some kind of hygienic resolution for associated items, but that was complex and likely incorrect, e.g. in #80762 correction to visibilites of trait items caused some traits to not be in scope anymore.
I previously had some comments and concerns about this in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/65351.
In this PR we are doing some much simpler pruning based on `Symbol` and `Namespace` comparisons, it should be enough to throw away 99.9% of unnecessary traits.
It is not necessary for pruning to be precise because for trait aliases, for example, we don't do any pruning at all, and precise hygienic resolution for associated items needs to be done in typeck anyway.
The somewhat unexpected effect is that trait imports introduced by macros 2.0 now bring traits into scope due to the removed hygienic check on associated item names.
I'm not sure whether it is desirable or not, but I think it's acceptable for now.
The old check was certainly incorrect because macros 2.0 did bring trait aliases into scope.
If doing this is not desirable, then we should come up with some other way to avoid bringing traits from macros 2.0 into scope, that would accommodate for trait aliases as well.
---
The PR also contains a couple of pure refactorings
- Scope walk is done by using `visit_scopes` instead of a hand-rolled version.
- Code is restructured to accomodate for rustdoc that also wants to query traits in scope, but doesn't want to filter them by associated items at all.
r? ```@matthewjasper```
Improve diagnostics when closure doesn't meet trait bound
Improves the diagnostics when closure doesn't meet trait bound by modifying `TypeckResuts::closure_kind_origins` such that `hir::Place` is used instead of `Symbol`. Using `hir::Place` to describe which capture influenced the decision of selecting a trait a closure satisfies to (Fn/FnMut/FnOnce, Copy) allows us to show precise path in the diagnostics when `capture_disjoint_field` feature is enabled.
Closes rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/21
r? ```@nikomatsakis```
resolve: Reject ambiguity built-in attr vs different built-in attr
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79798.
Resolution ensures that inert attributes cannot be used through imports like this, but built-in attributes don't go through initial resolution (only through resolution validation), so we have to keep some extra data (the built-in attribute name) to prevent it from happening.
correctly deal with late-bound lifetimes in anon consts
adds support for using late bound lifetimes of the parent context in anon consts.
```rust
#![feature(const_generics)]
const fn inner<'a>() -> usize where &'a (): Sized { 3 }
fn test<'a>() {
let _: [u8; inner::<'a>()];
}
```
The lifetime `'a` is late bound in `test` so it's not included in its generics but is instead dealt with separately in borrowck.
This didn't previously work for anon consts as they have to use the late bound lifetimes of their parent which has
to be explicitly handled.
r? ```@matthewjasper``` cc ```@varkor``` ```@eddyb```
Add `as_rchunks` (and friends) to slices
`@est31` mentioned (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76354#issuecomment-717027175) that, for completeness, there needed to be an `as_chunks`-like method that chunks from the end (with the remainder at the beginning) like `rchunks` does.
So here's a PR for `as_rchunks: &[T] -> (&[T], &[[T; N]])` and `as_rchunks_mut: &mut [T] -> (&mut [T], &mut [[T; N]])`.
But as I was doing this and copy-pasting `from_raw_parts` calls, I thought that I should extract that into an unsafe method. It started out a private helper, but it seemed like `as_chunks_unchecked` could be reasonable as a "real" method, so I added docs and made it public. Let me know if you think it doesn't pull its weight.
Move some tests to more reasonable directories - 2
All tests with a score equal or greater than 1.0 were moved to their respective directories by issuing
```bash
cat FILE | tr -s " " | tr -d '():' | sort -k3 | awk '$3 >= 1' | cut -d " " -f1-2 | sed 's;\\;/;g' | xargs -n2 git mv
```
**Observation**: The first column values is the only column with results greater zero
To attest the confidentiality of the model, some manual revision of at least of tests is needed and this process will be tracked in the following list:
* `src/test/ui/abi/issue-28676.rs` OK #28676
* `src/test/ui/array-slice-vec/issue-15730.rs` OK
* `src/test/ui/associated-types/issue-24338.rs` OK #54823
* `src/test/ui/associated-types/issue-48551.rs` Looks OK #48551
* `src/test/ui/associated-types/issue-50301.rs` Looks OK #63577
...
cc #73494
r? `@petrochenkov`
In #76612, suggestions were added for missing fields in
patterns. However, the suggestions are being inserted just at the end
of the last field in the pattern—before any trailing comma after the
last field. This resulted in the "if you don't care about missing
fields" suggestion to recommend code with a trailing comma after the
field ellipsis (`..,`), which is actually not legal ("`..` must be at
the end and cannot have a trailing comma")!
Incidentally, the doc-comment on `error_unmentioned_fields` was using
`you_cant_use_this_field` as an example field name (presumably
copy-paste inherited from the description of Issue #76077), but
the present author found this confusing, because unmentioned fields
aren't necessarily unusable.
The suggested code in the diff this commit introduces to
`destructuring-assignment/struct_destructure_fail.stderr` doesn't
work, but it didn't work beforehand, either (because of the "found
reserved identifier `_`" thing), so you can't really call it a
regression; it could be fixed in a separate PR.
Resolves#78511.
