rustdoc: Display "private fields" instead of "fields omitted"
Also:
* Always use `/* */` block comments
* Use the same message everywhere, rather than sometimes prefixing
with "some"
When I first read rustdoc docs, I was confused why the fields were being
omitted. It was only later that I realized it was because they were
private. It's also always bothered me that rustdoc sometimes uses `//`
and sometimes uses `/*` comments for these messages, so this change
makes them all use `/*`.
Technically, I think fields can be omitted if they are public but
`doc(hidden)` too, but `doc(hidden)` is analogous to privacy. It's
really just used to emulate "doc privacy" when -- because of technical
limitations -- an item has to be public. So I think it's fine to include
this under the category of "private fields".
r? ```@jsha```
Also:
* Always use `/* */` block comments
* Use the same message everywhere, rather than sometimes prefixing
with "some"
When I first read rustdoc docs, I was confused why the fields were being
omitted. It was only later that I realized it was because they were
private. It's also always bothered me that rustdoc sometimes uses `//`
and sometimes uses `/*` comments for these messages, so this change
makes them all use `/*`.
Technically, I think fields can be omitted if they are public but
`doc(hidden)` too, but `doc(hidden)` is analogous to privacy. It's
really just used to emulate "doc privacy" when -- because of technical
limitations -- an item has to be public. So I think it's fine to include
this under the category of "private fields".
Add test for where clause order
I didn't use ``@snapshot`` because of the ` ` characters, it's much simpler doing it through rustdoc-gui testsuite.
r? `@camelid`
rustdoc: make `--passes` and `--no-defaults` have no effect
Fixes#91714
One potential issue is that currently there is no stable way to achieve `--document-hidden-items`. This affects test `issue-15347`.
I also had to modify the tests `issue-42875` and `no-compiler-export`. Regardless of combinations of `--document-hidden-items` and `--document-private-items`, I was unable to get these to pass without the modifications. I left behind a comment noting the change.
- flags no longer function, see #44136
- adjust tests to match new behavior
- removed test issue-42875 (covered regression with --no-defaults)
- moved input-format to removed flags
- move all removed flags to bottom
- note flag removal in command help
- remove DefaultPassOption enum (now redundant with `show_coverage`)
Stabilize asm! and global_asm!
Tracking issue: #72016
It's been almost 2 years since the original [RFC](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2850) was posted and we're finally ready to stabilize this feature!
The main changes in this PR are:
- Removing `asm!` and `global_asm!` from the prelude as per the decision in #87228.
- Stabilizing the `asm` and `global_asm` features.
- Removing the unstable book pages for `asm` and `global_asm`. The contents are moved to the [reference](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1105) and [rust by example](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-by-example/pull/1483).
- All links to these pages have been removed to satisfy the link checker. In a later PR these will be replaced with links to the reference or rust by example.
- Removing the automatic suggestion for using `llvm_asm!` instead of `asm!` if you're still using the old syntax, since it doesn't work anymore with `asm!` no longer being in the prelude. This only affects code that predates the old LLVM-style `asm!` being renamed to `llvm_asm!`.
- Updating `stdarch` and `compiler-builtins`.
- Updating all the tests.
r? `@joshtriplett`
Stabilise `feature(const_generics_defaults)`
`feature(const_generics_defaults)` is complete implementation wise and has a pretty extensive test suite so I think is ready for stabilisation.
needs stabilisation report and maybe an RFC 😅
r? `@lcnr`
cc `@rust-lang/project-const-generics`
They are also removed from the prelude as per the decision in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87228.
stdarch and compiler-builtins are updated to work with the new, stable
asm! and global_asm! macros.
rustdoc: Add regression test for Iterator as notable trait on &T
Closes#78160
This regression test is different from the one in #91748, because while neither of these function should have Iterator marked as a notable trait, the reasons are different.
* In this PR, it returns `&T where T: Iterator`. The `mut` is what's missing.
* In #91748, it returns `&mut T`. The trait bounds are what's missing.
At first, you might think, "Why not just click through to the aliased
type?" But, if a type alias instantiates all of the generic parameters
of the aliased type, then it can show layout info even though the
aliased type cannot (because we can't compute layout for generic types).
So, I think it's useful to show layout info for type aliases.
This is a followup of 78d4b453ad2e19d44011b26fc55c949bff5dba3d
(originally part of #83501).
I'd been thinking about implementing snapshot testing for a while, but
This test is what finally made me do it. It really benefits from using
snapshot testing, so it's a good initial place to use `@snapshot`.
Deny warnings in rustdoc non-UI tests
These warnings were silently ignored since they did not appear in a
`.stderr` file and did not fail the test. With this change, warnings in
tests are denied, causing the tests to fail if they have warnings.
This change has already led me to find a bug in rustdoc (#91274) and a
useless test (`src/test/rustdoc/primitive/primitive-generic-impl.rs`,
though its uselessness is unrelated to its warnings).
r? `@jyn514`
Using `include!` shouldn't affect the test. It was only added because:
> I replicated how it was performed in libstd. Since it's the main
> target of this fix, I thought it was the best way.
<https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/52827/files#r207647331>
But it's unnecessary and adds unnecessary indirection.
rustdoc: Add test for mixing doc comments and attrs
This is a step toward adding more test coverage to make it easier to
remove the distinction between collapsed and uncollapsed doc values.
Avoid documenting top-level private imports
PR #88447 aimed to make rustdoc's `--document-private-items` mode only document imports that are visible outside the importing module. Unfortunately, I inadvertently set things up so that imports at the crate top-level are always documented, regardless of their visibility. This behavior was unintended and is [not desirable](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90865#issuecomment-971172649).
This PR treats top-level imports as never being visible outside their parent module. In practice, the only way a top-level import can be visible externally is if it's fully public, and there's a seperate check for that.
It's worth calling attention to the fact that this change means that `pub(crate)` imports will be visible in lower level modules, but not at the top-level. This is because, at the top level of the crate, `pub(crate)` means the same thing as `pub(self)`.
It turned out that there were existing tests checking for the only behavior, which I didn't notice at the time of my previous PR. I have updated them to check for the new behavior and substantially extended them to handle differences between the top-level module and lower level modules. I may have gone overboard, so please tell me if there's anything I should cut.
r? `@jyn514`
Fixes#90865.
- Remove border.
- Reduce size of emoji slightly.
- Remove details disclosure for unstable reason. This was inconsistent
with our other details disclosures, and the detail revealed was
usually better explained by clicking on the issue link.
Use h3 and h4 for the variant name and the "Fields" subheading.
Remove the "of T" part of the "Fields" subheading.
Remove border-bottom from "Fields" subheading.
Move docblock below "Fields" listing.
