Remove `#[rustc_deprecated]`
This removes `#[rustc_deprecated]` and introduces diagnostics to help users to the right direction (that being `#[deprecated]`). All uses of `#[rustc_deprecated]` have been converted. CI is expected to fail initially; this requires #95958, which includes converting `stdarch`.
I plan on following up in a short while (maybe a bootstrap cycle?) removing the diagnostics, as they're only intended to be short-term.
Fix jump to def regression
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93803 introduced a regression in the "jump to def" feature. This fixes it.
Nice side-effect: it adds a new regression test. :)
I also used this opportunity to add documentation about this unstable feature in the rustdoc book.
cc ``@cjgillot``
r? ``@notriddle``
rustdoc: fix missing method list for primitive deref target
This change makes it so that local impls count when listing primitives that need retained.
Fixes#95325
The current "This is supported" wording implies that it's possible to
still use the item on other configurations, but in an unsupported way.
Changing this to "Available" removes this ambiguity.
Hide cross-crate `#[doc(hidden)]` associated items in trait impls
Fixes#95717.
r? ```@GuillaumeGomez```
This is the bug I ran into in #95316.
```@rustbot``` label T-rustdoc A-cross-crate-reexports
Bump bootstrap compiler to 1.61.0 beta
This PR bumps the bootstrap compiler to the 1.61.0 beta. The first commit changes the stage0 compiler, the second commit applies the "mechanical" changes and the third and fourth commits apply changes explained in the relevant comments.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Fix intra doc link ICE when trying to get traits in scope for primitive
Fixes#95633.
I think ``@notriddle`` was the one who worked on this part of the code last so:
r? ``@notriddle``
rustdoc: Fix resolution of `crate`-relative paths in doc links
Resolve `crate::foo` paths transparently to rustdoc, so their resolution no longer affects diagnostics and modules used for determining traits in scope.
The proper solution is to account for the current `module_id`/`parent_scope` in `fn resolve_crate_root`, but it's a slightly larger compiler changes. This PR moves the code closer to it, but keeps it rustdoc-specific.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/78696
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94924
Handle rustc_const_stable attribute in library feature collector
The library feature collector in [compiler/rustc_passes/src/lib_features.rs](551b4fa395/compiler/rustc_passes/src/lib_features.rs) has only been looking at `#[stable(…)]`, `#[unstable(…)]`, and `#[rustc_const_unstable(…)]` attributes, while ignoring `#[rustc_const_stable(…)]`. The consequences of this were:
- When any const feature got stabilized (changing one or more `rustc_const_unstable` to `rustc_const_stable`), users who had previously enabled that unstable feature using `#![feature(…)]` would get told "unknown feature", rather than rustc's nicer "the feature … has been stable since … and no longer requires an attribute to enable".
This can be seen in the way that https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93957#issuecomment-1079794660 failed after rebase:
```console
error[E0635]: unknown feature `const_ptr_offset`
--> $DIR/offset_from_ub.rs:1:35
|
LL | #![feature(const_ptr_offset_from, const_ptr_offset)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
- We weren't enforcing that a particular feature is either stable everywhere or unstable everywhere, and that a feature that has been stabilized has the same stabilization version everywhere, both of which we enforce for the other stability attributes.
This PR updates the library feature collector to handle `rustc_const_stable`, and fixes places in the standard library and test suite where `rustc_const_stable` was being used in a way that does not meet the rules for a stability attribute.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #95032 (Clean up, categorize and sort unstable features in std.)
- #95260 (Better suggestions for `Fn`-family trait selection errors)
- #95293 (suggest wrapping single-expr blocks in square brackets)
- #95344 (Make `impl Debug for rustdoc::clean::Item` easier to read)
- #95388 (interpret: make isize::MAX the limit for dynamic value sizes)
- #95530 (rustdoc: do not show primitives and keywords as private)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rustdoc: add 🔒 to items with restricted visibility
This change marks items with restricted visibility with 🔒 when building with `--document-private-items`:
<img width="278" alt="Screen Shot 2022-03-20 at 23 50 24" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/509209/159189513-9e4b09bb-6785-41a5-bfe2-df02f83f8641.png">
There also appears a “Restricted Visibility” tooltip when hovering over the emoji.
---
The original PR for reference:
This change makes private items slightly transparent (similar to `unstable` items in rustc):
<img width="272" alt="Screen Shot 2022-03-16 at 22 17 43" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/509209/158692627-a1f6f5ec-e043-4aa2-9352-8d2b15c31c08.png">
I found myself using `--document-private-items` a lot recently because I find the documentation of private internals quite helpful when working on a larger project. However, not being able to distinguish private from public items (see #87785) when looking at the documentation makes this somewhat cumbersome.
This PR addresses the third suggestion of issue #87785 by marking private items typographically. It seems to me that the other suggestions are more involved but this is at least a first step.
A private item is also made slightly transparent in the path displayed in the header of a page:
<img width="467" alt="Screen Shot 2022-03-16 at 22 19 51" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/509209/158692885-0bbd3417-3c0b-486f-b8ab-99c05c6fa7ca.png">
I am looking forward to feedback and suggestions.
