- Refactors the Emscripten target spec to share code with other wasm
targets.
- Replaces the incorrect wasm32 C call ABI with the old asmjs
version, which is correct for both wasm32 and JS.
- Updates the varargs ABI used by Emscripten and deletes the old one.
- Removes the obsolete wasm32-experimental-emscripten target.
- Temporarily makes Emscripten targets use panic=abort by default
because supporting unwinding will require an LLVM patch.
This adds a new rustc target-configuration called 'i686-unknown_uefi'.
This is similar to existing x86_64-unknown_uefi target.
The i686-unknown-uefi target can be used to build Intel Architecture
32bit UEFI application. The ABI defined in UEFI environment (aka IA32)
is similar to cdecl.
We choose i686-unknown-uefi-gnu instead of i686-unknown-uefi to avoid
the intrinsics generated by LLVM. The detail of root-cause and solution
analysis is added as comment in the code.
For x86_64-unknown-uefi, we cannot use -gnu, because the ABI between
MSVC and GNU is totally different, and UEFI chooses ABI similar to MSVC.
For i686-unknown-uefi, the UEFI chooses cdecl ABI, which is same as
MSVC and GNU. According to LLVM code, the only differences between MSVC
and GNU are fmodf(f32), longjmp() and TLS, which have no impact to UEFI.
As such, using i686-unknown-uefi-gnu is the simplest way to pass the build.
Adding the undefined symbols, such as _aulldiv() to rust compiler-builtins
is out of scope. But it may be considered later.
The scope of this patch is limited to support target-configuration.
No standard library support is added in this patch. Such work can be
done in future enhancement.
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh.triplett@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh.triplett@intel.com>
Some update for vxWorks
1. support crt-static
2. change armv7_wrs_vxworks to armv7_wrs_vxworks_eabihf.
3. change vx-cxx to wr-c++, vx-ar to wr-ar and vx-run to wr-run.
4. code cleanup
r? @alexcrichton
add sparc64-unknown-openbsd target
on OpenBSD, some architectures relies on libc++ (from LLVM) and some
others on libestdc++ (particular version of libstdc++ from GCC).
sparc64-unknown-openbsd needs libestdc++ and libgcc (as x86_64 some
years ago). Reintroduce the support of them for openbsd, only for
sparc64 arch. Some others architectures on OpenBSD could use them too.
on OpenBSD, some architectures relies on libc++ (from LLVM) and some
others on libestdc++ (particular version of libstdc++ from GCC).
sparc64-unknown-openbsd needs libestdc++ and libgcc (as x86_64 some
years ago). Reintroduce the support of them for openbsd, only for
sparc64 arch. Some others architectures on OpenBSD could use them too.
Add Catalyst (iOS apps running on macOS) target
This is a first attempt of adding support for the new [Apple Catalyst](https://developer.apple.com/ipad-apps-for-mac/) target (i.e. running iOS apps on macOS). Currently, `rustc` supports the iOS and iOS simulator targets for iOS:
- iOS: ARM cpu, iOS SDK, linked agains the iOS ABI
- Simulator: X86_64 cpu, iOS SDK, linked against the iOS ABI
Apple Catalyst will add an additional target:
- Macabi: X86_64 CPU, iOS SDK, linked again the macOS ABI.
Note, it the actual SDK is the also the macOS 10.15 SDK, but the symbols are the iOS SDK symbols as they were added to macOS with 10.15.
I've collected additional information via links in the open question sections below. This is way out of my comfort zone so please excuse whatever errors I may have made.
# Open Questions:
## Clang Version
It seems to me that `macabi` has not been merged into `clang` yet, I don't know whether that is a requirement rustc to compile, or if it is sufficient if the Clang that is used on a developers system is the correct one supporting macabi (that comes with current Xcode)
## Hardcoded iOS version
`swift-llvm` actually used [x86_64-apple-ios13.0-macabi](3f1fd4f46a) as the target triple which hard-codes the current iOS version. A post on stackoverflow [points out that `MIN_IOS_VERSION` and `MIN_OSX_VERSION` should be used when compiling C code for clang (`-target x86_64-apple-ios${MIN_IOS_VERSION}-macabi`)](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56487645/how-to-compile-a-3rd-party-library-to-be-used-with-uikit-for-mac-catalyst). However, I wasn't entirely sure how to do that in this PR. Pointers welcome.
## Data Layout
I'm probably using the wrong data-layout. I don't know whether it should be the macOS version or the iOS version. This is probably easier to answer for somebody who understands these things much better than me. I just copied the iOS Simulator X86_64 version as it seems to be (based on what I understand) that Catalyst is just the simulator target build against a different SDK.
# Current State
1. I got it to compile
2. I could successfully compile a `macabi` `libcore` via `cargo build --target x86_64-apple-ios-macabi`
I'm not sure what needs to be done next. Supposedly I need to compile everything into a toolchain somehow that I can then test via `rustup` to make sure that a binary compiled against the toolchain also works with Catalyst. [I read this article, but I'm still lost](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/5ag60z/how_do_i_bootstrap_rust_to_crosscompile_for_a_new/d9gicr2/) and would love pointers what to do next here.
# Additional Information
- [Commit adding Catalyst support to the Swift Clang Fork](https://github.com/CocoaPods/CocoaPods/issues/8877)
- [Compiling C to Catalyst Discussion](https://github.com/CocoaPods/CocoaPods/issues/8877)
- [CocoaPods Discussion on Adding Catalyst support](https://github.com/CocoaPods/CocoaPods/issues/8877)
Add builtin targets for mips64(el)-unknown-linux-muslabi64
This is prerequisite for rust-lang/libc#1449.
Tested locally to produce working static and dynamic binaries, ~~but CI config is untested for now~~ CI is to be added in a follow-up PR.
*edit: dynamic binaries also confirmed working!*
*edit 2: changed triples to include ABI, and removed stray `crt_static_default = false` declarations to be consistent with other musl targets*
Add UWP MSVC targets
Hi,
- The README URI change is the correct one for VS2019 community edition, which I suspect most people would use. Doesn't _need_ to be merged though.
- This 5e6619edd1 fixes the UWP build (msvc or not, doesn't matter). I suspect it broke with recent changes unnoticed because no CI.
- Store lib location is found through the VCToolsInstallDir env variable. The end of the path is currently for the VS2019 store lib locations only.
- I could not test the aarch64_uwp_windows_msvc target because the rust build script does not currently support arm64 msvc AFAIU.
This is a first attempt of adding support for the new Apple Catalyst ABI (i.e. running iOS apps on macOS). Currently, `rustc` supports the iOS and iOS simulator targets for iOS:
- iOS: ARM cpu, iOS SDK, linked agains the iOS ABI
- Simulator: X86_64 cpu, iOS SDK, linked against the iOS ABI
Apple Catalyst will add an additional target:
- Macabi: X86_64 CPU, iOS SDK, linked again the macOS ABI.
Note, it the actual SDK is the also the macOS 10.15 SDK, but the symbols are the iOS SDK symbols as they were added to macOS with 10.15.
This commits adds the files for this new target triple.
Hard-float (unlike mips32 musl targets but consistent with any other
musl target), MIPS64r2, n64 ABI.
The triples are renamed to carry the `abi64` ABI suffix found on all
other MIPS64 targets, for consistency and forward compatibility, should
Rust gain support for the n32 ABI one day.
Added support for armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabi/musleabi
Fixes#63101
Some things that are not done and I hope someone can help me with:
* During the ci build of `armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabi` `openssl` must be built (to build cargo) but `openssl` does not yet support this target. This feels slightly like a chicken-and-egg problem, any feedback is welcome.
* Should I add any tests for any of these targets?
A list of options in a comment like this is almost guaranteed to become out of date. This list is missing "riscv32" and "riscv64" and perhaps other architectures as well.
The errors are either:
- The meta-variable used in the right-hand side is not bound (or defined) in the
left-hand side.
- The meta-variable used in the right-hand side does not repeat with the same
kleene operator as its binder in the left-hand side. Either it does not repeat
enough, or it uses a different operator somewhere.
This change should have no semantic impact.
Limit dylib symbols
This makes `windows-gnu` match the behavior of `windows-msvc`. It probably doesn't make sense to export these symbols on other platforms either.
This renames wasm32-unknown-wasi to wasm32-wasi, omitting the vendor
component. This follows aarch64-linux-android, x86_64-fuchsia, and others in
omitting the vendor field, which has the advantage of aligning with the
[multiarch tuple](https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Tuples), and of being
less noisy.
This commit adds a new wasm32-based target distributed through rustup,
supported in the standard library, and implemented in the compiler. The
`wasm32-unknown-wasi` target is intended to be a WebAssembly target
which matches the [WASI proposal recently announced.][LINK]. In summary
the WASI target is an effort to define a standard set of syscalls for
WebAssembly modules, allowing WebAssembly modules to not only be
portable across architectures but also be portable across environments
implementing this standard set of system calls.
The wasi target in libstd is still somewhat bare bones. This PR does not
fill out the filesystem, networking, threads, etc. Instead it only
provides the most basic of integration with the wasi syscalls, enabling
features like:
* `Instant::now` and `SystemTime::now` work
* `env::args` is hooked up
* `env::vars` will look up environment variables
* `println!` will print to standard out
* `process::{exit, abort}` should be hooked up appropriately
None of these APIs can work natively on the `wasm32-unknown-unknown`
target, but with the assumption of the WASI set of syscalls we're able
to provide implementations of these syscalls that engines can implement.
Currently the primary engine implementing wasi is [wasmtime], but more
will surely emerge!
In terms of future development of libstd, I think this is something
we'll probably want to discuss. The purpose of the WASI target is to
provide a standardized set of syscalls, but it's *also* to provide a
standard C sysroot for compiling C/C++ programs. This means it's
intended that functions like `read` and `write` are implemented for this
target with a relatively standard definition and implementation. It's
unclear, therefore, how we want to expose file descriptors and how we'll
want to implement system primitives. For example should `std::fs::File`
have a libc-based file descriptor underneath it? The raw wasi file
descriptor? We'll see! Currently these details are all intentionally
hidden and things we can change over time.
A `WasiFd` sample struct was added to the standard library as part of
this commit, but it's not currently used. It shows how all the wasi
syscalls could be ergonomically bound in Rust, and they offer a possible
implementation of primitives like `std::fs::File` if we bind wasi file
descriptors exactly.
Apart from the standard library, there's also the matter of how this
target is integrated with respect to its C standard library. The
reference sysroot, for example, provides managment of standard unix file
descriptors and also standard APIs like `open` (as opposed to the
relative `openat` inspiration for the wasi ssycalls). Currently the
standard library relies on the C sysroot symbols for operations such as
environment management, process exit, and `read`/`write` of stdio fds.
We want these operations in Rust to be interoperable with C if they're
used in the same process. Put another way, if Rust and C are linked into
the same WebAssembly binary they should work together, but that requires
that the same C standard library is used.
We also, however, want the `wasm32-unknown-wasi` target to be
usable-by-default with the Rust compiler without requiring a separate
toolchain to get downloaded and configured. With that in mind, there's
two modes of operation for the `wasm32-unknown-wasi` target:
1. By default the C standard library is statically provided inside of
`liblibc.rlib` distributed as part of the sysroot. This means that
you can `rustc foo.wasm --target wasm32-unknown-unknown` and you're
good to go, a fully workable wasi binary pops out. This is
incompatible with linking in C code, however, which may be compiled
against a different sysroot than the Rust code was previously
compiled against. In this mode the default of `rust-lld` is used to
link binaries.
2. For linking with C code, the `-C target-feature=-crt-static` flag
needs to be passed. This takes inspiration from the musl target for
this flag, but the idea is that you're no longer using the provided
static C runtime, but rather one will be provided externally. This
flag is intended to also get coupled with an external `clang`
compiler configured with its own sysroot. Therefore you'll typically
use this flag with `-C linker=/path/to/clang-script-wrapper`. Using
this mode the Rust code will continue to reference standard C
symbols, but the definition will be pulled in by the linker configured.
Alright so that's all the current state of this PR. I suspect we'll
definitely want to discuss this before landing of course! This PR is
coupled with libc changes as well which I'll be posting shortly.
[LINK]:
[wasmtime]:
This commit adds support code for using `clang` directly to link the
wasm32-unknown-unknown target. Currently the target is only really
configured to link with LLD directly, but this ensures that `clang` can
be configured as well.
While not immediately useful in the near term it's likely that more
wasm32 targets will pop up over time with Clang's new native support for
WebAssembly in the 8.0.0 release. Getting support into rustc early
should make it easier to experiment with these targets and try out
various changes here and there.
MIPS: add r6 support
MIPS r6 is quite different with the previous version.
It use some new target triples:
mipsisa32r6-unknown-linux-gnu
mipsisa32r6el-unknown-linux-gnu
mipsisa64r6-unknown-linux-gnuabi64
mipsisa64r6el-unknown-linux-gnuabi64
This patch has been tested with Debian Port for mips64r6el,
and the support of these triples also is included in llvm:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rGe58c45a695f39004710b6ce940d489fee800dbd3
MIPS r6 is quite different with the previous version.
It use some new target triples:
mipsisa32r6-unknown-linux-gnu
mipsisa32r6el-unknown-linux-gnu
mipsisa64r6-unknown-linux-gnuabi64
mipsisa64r6el-unknown-linux-gnuabi64
This patch has been tested with Debian Port for mips64r6el,
and the support of these triples also is included in llvm:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rGe58c45a695f39004710b6ce940d489fee800dbd3
Before this commit, if the builtin target was found, but an error
happened when instantiating it (e.g. validating the target
specification file failed, etc.), then we ignored those errors
and proceeded to try to find a `target_triple.json` file, and if
that failed, reported that as an error.
With this commit, if rustc is supposed to provide the builtin target,
and something fails while instantiating it, that error will
get properly propagated.
