rustdoc: remove unused classes from sidebar links
Since 98f05a0282 removed separate colors from the currently-selected item, there's no need to have item classes on sidebar links.
Preview: https://notriddle.com/notriddle-rustdoc-demos/sidebar-link-class/std/vec/struct.Vec.html
While cleaning up the CSS to remove unneeded `.content` selectors, this PR changes the `h1.fqn a` CSS selector to just be `h1 a`, so that the header link color selector is less specific than the typed link at the end. Since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89506 made docblocks start at `h2`, the main page link header should be the only h1 in the page now.
Check representability in adt_sized_constraint
Now that representability is a query, we can use it to preemptively avoid a cycle in `adt_sized_constraint`.
I moved the representability check into `check_mod_type_wf` to avoid a scenario where rustc quits before checking all the types for representability. This also removes the check from rustdoc, which is alright AFAIK.
r? ``@cjgillot``
Use correct location for type tests in promoted constants
Previously we forgot to remap the location in a type test collected when visiting the body of a promoted constant back to the usage location, causing an ICE when trying to get span information for that type test.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102117
Migrate rustc_passes diagnostics
Picks up abandoned work from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100870
I would like to do this collaboratively, as there is a lot of work! Here's the process:
- Comment below that you are willing to help and I will add you as a collaborator to my `rust` fork (that gives you write access)
- Indicate which file/task you would like to work on (so we don't duplicate work) from the list below
- Do the work, push up a commit, comment that you're done with that file/task
- Repeat until done 😄
### Files to Migrate (in `compiler/rustc_passes/src/`)
- [x] check_attr.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] check_const.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] dead.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] debugger_visualizer.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] diagnostic_items.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] entry.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] lang_items.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] layout_test.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] lib_features.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] ~liveness.rs~ ``@CleanCut`` Nothing to do
- [x] loops.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] naked_functions.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] stability.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] weak_lang_items.rs ``@CleanCut``
### Tasks
- [x] Rebase on current `master` ``@CleanCut``
- [x] Review work from [the earlier PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100870) and make sure it all looks good
- [x] compiler/rustc_error_messages/locales/en-US/passes.ftl ``@CleanCut``
- [x] compiler/rustc_passes/src/check_attr.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] compiler/rustc_passes/src/errors.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] compiler/rustc_passes/src/lang_items.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] compiler/rustc_passes/src/lib.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] compiler/rustc_passes/src/weak_lang_items.rs ``@CleanCut``
Check uniqueness of impl items by trait item when applicable.
When checking uniqueness of item names in impl blocks, we currently use the same definition of hygiene as for toplevel items. This means that a plain item and one generated by a macro 2.0 do not collide.
This hygiene rule does not match with how impl items resolve to associated trait items. As a consequence, we misdiagnose the trait impls.
This PR proposes to consider that trait impl items are uses of the corresponding trait items during resolution, instead of checking for duplicates later. An error is emitted when a trait impl item is used twice.
There should be no stable breakage, since macros 2.0 are still unstable.
r? ``@petrochenkov``
cc ``@RalfJung``
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71614.
Fix the sanitizer_scs_attr_check.rs test
The test is failing when targeting aarch64 Android. The intent appears to have been to look for a function attributes comment (or the absence of one) on the line preceding the function declaration. But this isn't quite possible with FileCheck and the test as written was looking for a line with `no_scs` after a line with `scs`, which doesn't appear in the output. Instead, match on the function attributes comment on the line following the demangled function name comment.
Improve rustdoc-gui search-color test
Thanks to the add of "functions" in `browser-ui-test`, we can start to reduce the size of the scripts. It'll be very useful for all color checks.
r? `@notriddle`
suggest candidates for unresolved import
Currently we prompt suggestion of candidates(help notes of `use xxx::yyy`) for names which cannot be resolved, but we don't do that for import statements themselves that couldn't be resolved. It seems reasonable to add candidate help information for these statements as well.
Fixes#102711
Uplift `clippy::for_loops_over_fallibles` lint into rustc
This PR, as the title suggests, uplifts [`clippy::for_loops_over_fallibles`] lint into rustc. This lint warns for code like this:
```rust
for _ in Some(1) {}
for _ in Ok::<_, ()>(1) {}
```
i.e. directly iterating over `Option` and `Result` using `for` loop.
There are a number of suggestions that this PR adds (on top of what clippy suggested):
1. If the argument (? is there a better name for that expression) of a `for` loop is a `.next()` call, then we can suggest removing it (or rather replacing with `.by_ref()` to allow iterator being used later)
```rust
for _ in iter.next() {}
// turns into
for _ in iter.by_ref() {}
```
2. (otherwise) We can suggest using `while let`, this is useful for non-iterator, iterator-like things like [async] channels
```rust
for _ in rx.recv() {}
// turns into
while let Some(_) = rx.recv() {}
```
3. If the argument type is `Result<impl IntoIterator, _>` and the body has a `Result<_, _>` type, we can suggest using `?`
```rust
for _ in f() {}
// turns into
for _ in f()? {}
```
4. To preserve the original behavior and clear intent, we can suggest using `if let`
```rust
for _ in f() {}
// turns into
if let Some(_) = f() {}
```
(P.S. `Some` and `Ok` are interchangeable depending on the type)
I still feel that the lint wording/look is somewhat off, so I'll be happy to hear suggestions (on how to improve suggestions :D)!
Resolves#99272
[`clippy::for_loops_over_fallibles`]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#for_loops_over_fallibles
Elaborate trait ref to compute object safety.
instead of building them manually from supertraits and associated items.
This allows to have the correct substs for GATs.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102751
don't ICE when normalizing closure input tys
We were ICEing while rendering diagnostics because `universe_causes` is expected to track every universe created in the typeck's infcx.
`normalize_and_add_constraints` doesn't update `universe_causes`
when creating new universes, causing an ICE. Remove it!
Add spans to better track normalization constraints.
Fix couple places where `universe_causes` is not updated correctly to
track newly added universes.
Fixes#102800
~Fixess #99665~ (UPDATE: no longer true; the issue has a different failure path than when this PR was created and should be fixed by #101708, but the changes in this PR are still correct and should prevent potential future ICEs)
test: run-make: skip when cross-compiling
This test fails when targeting aarch64 Android. Instead of adding yet another architecture here (and one that's increasingly more common as the host), let's replace the growing list of architectures with ignore-cross-compile.
