Revert "Set test flag when rustdoc is running with --test option"
Reverts https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/59940.
It caused doctests in this repository to no longer be tested including all of the core crate.
Add suggestion for missing `.await` keyword
This commit adds a suggestion diagnostic for missing `.await`. In order to do this, the trait `Future` is promoted to a lang item.
Compiling code of the form:
```rust
#![feature(async_await)]
fn take_u32(x: u32) {}
async fn make_u32() -> u32 {
22
}
async fn foo() {
let x = make_u32();
take_u32(x)
}
fn main() {}
```
Will now result in the suggestion:
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src/main.rs:11:18
|
11 | take_u32(x)
| ^
| |
| expected u32, found opaque type
| help: consider using `.await` here: `x.await`
|
= note: expected type `u32`
found type `impl std::future::Future`
```
This commit does not cover chained expressions and therefore only covers the case originally pointed out in #61076. Cases I can think of that still need to be covered:
- [ ] Return places for functions
- [ ] Field access
- [ ] Method invocation
I'm planning to submit PRs for each of these separately as and when I have figured them out.
Fix meta-variable binding errors in macros
The errors are either:
- The meta-variable used in the right-hand side is not bound (or defined) in the
left-hand side.
- The meta-variable used in the right-hand side does not repeat with the same
kleene operator as its binder in the left-hand side. Either it does not repeat
enough, or it uses a different operator somewhere.
This change should have no semantic impact.
Found by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/62008
The errors are either:
- The meta-variable used in the right-hand side is not bound (or defined) in the
left-hand side.
- The meta-variable used in the right-hand side does not repeat with the same
kleene operator as its binder in the left-hand side. Either it does not repeat
enough, or it uses a different operator somewhere.
This change should have no semantic impact.
Remove the default type of `Rem::Output`
Associated type defaults are not yet stable, and `Rem` is the only trait that specifies a default. Let's see what breaks when it's removed.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/61812#issuecomment-502394566
cc @Centril
@bors try
Implement nth_back for slice::{Iter, IterMut}
Part of #54054.
I implemented `nth_back` as straightforwardly as I could, and then slightly changed `nth` to match `nth_back`. I believe I did so correctly, but please double-check 🙂
I also added the helper methods `zst_shrink`, `next_unchecked`, and `next_back_unchecked` to get rid of some duplicated code. These changes hopefully make this code easier to understand for new contributors like me.
I noticed the `is_empty!` and `len!` macros which sole purpose seems to be inlining, according to the comment right above them, but the `is_empty` and `len` methods are already marked with `#[inline(always)]`. Does that mean we could replace these macros with method calls, without affecting anything? I'd love to get rid of them.
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #61505 (Only show methods that appear in `impl` blocks in the Implementors sections of trait doc pages)
- #61701 (move stray run-pass const tests into const/ folder)
- #61748 (Tweak transparent enums and unions diagnostic spans)
- #61802 (Make MaybeUninit #[repr(transparent)])
- #61839 (ci: Add a script for generating CPU usage graphs)
- #61842 (Remove unnecessary lift calls)
- #61843 (Turn down the myriad-closures test)
- #61896 (rustc_typeck: correctly compute `Substs` for `Res::SelfCtor`.)
- #61898 (syntax: Factor out common fields from `SyntaxExtension` variants)
- #61938 (create an issue for miri even in status test-fail)
- #61941 (Preserve generator and yield source for error messages)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
Refactor C FFI variadics to more closely match their C counterparts, and add Clone implementation
We had to make some changes to expose `va_copy` and `va_end` directly to users (mainly for C2Rust, but not exclusively):
- redefine the Rust variadic structures to more closely correspond to C: `VaList` now matches `va_list`, and `VaListImpl` matches `__va_list_tag`
- add `Clone` for `VaListImpl`
- add explicit `as_va_list()` conversion function from `VaListImpl` to `VaList`
- add deref coercion from `VaList` to `VaListImpl`
- add support for the `asmjs` target
All these changes were needed for use cases like:
```Rust
let mut ap2 = va_copy(ap);
vprintf(fmt, ap2);
va_end(&mut ap2);
```
Help LLVM better optimize slice::Iter(Mut)::len
r? @RalfJung
I've included a codegen test that fails without this change as a demonstration of usefulness.
Change `...` to `..=` where applicable
This is mainly to fix#61816, but I decided to manually check a few thousand `...` throughout the code base to check for any other cases. I think I found a documentation bug in `src\libsyntax\ast.rs` where both `1..` and `1...` where mentioned. If there is internal support for both `1..` and `1..=` (that can exist before error handling gets to it), then I can add that back.
There were some other cases that look like `// struct Closure<'l0...'li, T0...Tj, CK, CS, U0...Uk> {`, `// <P0 as Trait<P1...Pn>>::Foo: 'a`, and `assert!(min <= max, "discriminant range is {}...{}", min, max);`, but I am not sure if I should change those.
There are a bunch of cases in the `/test/` directory that could be changed, but I presume I should just leave those be.
std: Remove internal definitions of `cfg_if!` macro
This is duplicated in a few locations throughout the sysroot to work
around issues with not exporting a macro in libstd but still wanting it
available to sysroot crates to define blocks. Nowadays though we can
simply depend on the `cfg-if` crate on crates.io, allowing us to use it
from there!
Hygienize macros in the standard library
Same as https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/55597, but for all macros in the standard library.
Nested macro calls will now call what they are intended to call rather than whatever is in the closest scope at call site.
Technically this is a breaking change, so crater run would probably be useful.
---
One exception that is not hygienized is calls to `panic!(...)`.
Macros defined in libcore do not want to call `core::panic`.
What they really want to call is either `std::panic` or `core::panic` depending on `no_std` settings.
EDIT: After some thought, recursive calls to `panic` from `panic` itself probably do want to use `$crate` (UPDATE: done).
Calling `std::panic` from macros defined in std and "whatever `panic` is in scope" from macros defined in libcore is probably even worse than always calling "whatever `panic` is in scope", so I kept the existing code.
The only way to do the std/core switch correctly that I'm aware of is to define a built-in panic macro that would dispatch to `std::panic` or `core::panic` using compiler magic.
Then standard library macros could delegate to this built-in macro.
The macro could be named `panic` too, that would fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61567.
(This PR doesn't do that.)
---
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56389
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61567
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61699
r? @alexcrichton
This is duplicated in a few locations throughout the sysroot to work
around issues with not exporting a macro in libstd but still wanting it
available to sysroot crates to define blocks. Nowadays though we can
simply depend on the `cfg-if` crate on crates.io, allowing us to use it
from there!
