Fix Box allocator drop elaboration
New version of rust-lang/rust#131146.
Clearing Box's drop flag after running its destructor can cause it to skip dropping its allocator, so just don't. Its cleared by the drop ladder code afterwards already.
Unlike the last PR this also handles other types with destructors properly, in the event that we can have open drops on them in the future (by partial initialization or DerefMove or something).
Finally, I also added tests for the interaction with async drop here but I discovered rust-lang/rust#143658, so one of the tests has a `knownbug` annotation. Not sure if it should be in this PR at all though.
Fixesrust-lang/rust#131082
r? wesleywiser - prev. reviewer
`tests/ui/issues/`: The Issues Strike Back [1/N]
I believe I’ve finally brought [my program](https://github.com/Kivooeo/test-manager) to life -- it now handles multiple test moves in one go: plain moves first, then a gentle touch on each file depends on given options. The process should be much smoother now.
Of course, I won’t rush through everything in a few days -- that would be unkind to `@Oneirical.` I’ll pace myself. And also I can't have more than one such PR because `issues.txt` will conflict with previous parts after merging them which is not fun as well.
This PR is just that: first commit - moves; second - regression comments and the occasional .stderr reblesses, also issue.txt and tidy changes. Nothing special, but progress nonetheless. This is for the purpose of preserving test file history during restructuring
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133895.
r? `@jieyouxu`
`tests/ui`: A New Order [28/28] FINAL PART
> [!NOTE]
>
> Intermediate commits are intended to help review, but will be squashed prior to merge.
Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang/rust#133895.
r? ``@tgross35``
`tests/ui`: A New Order [25/N]
> [!NOTE]
>
> Intermediate commits are intended to help review, but will be squashed prior to merge.
Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang/rust#133895.
r? `@tgross35`
Remove let_chains unstable feature
Per https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53667#issuecomment-3016742982 (but then I also noticed rust-lang/rust#140722)
This replaces the feature gate with a parser error that says let chains require 2024.
A lot of tests were using the unstable feature. I either added edition:2024 to the test or split out the parts that require 2024.
`tests/ui`: A New Order [11/N]
Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang/rust#133895.
r? `@jieyouxu`
add tests for pattern binding drop order edge cases
This adds tests for rust-lang/rust#142163, rust-lang/rust#142057, and rust-lang/rust#142056. I'm using these tests to help make sure I don't commit breaking changes when implementing match lowering for guard patterns, but I think it makes sense to add them separately. They don't directly have anything to do with guard patterns.
r? `@Nadrieril` or reassign
Add a new `mismatched-lifetime-syntaxes` lint
The lang-team [discussed this](https://hackmd.io/nf4ZUYd7Rp6rq-1svJZSaQ) and I attempted to [summarize](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120808#issuecomment-2701863833) their decision. The summary-of-the-summary is:
- Using two different kinds of syntax for elided lifetimes is confusing. In rare cases, it may even [lead to unsound code](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48686)! Some examples:
```rust
// Lint will warn about these
fn(v: ContainsLifetime) -> ContainsLifetime<'_>;
fn(&'static u8) -> &u8;
```
- Matching up references with no lifetime syntax, references with anonymous lifetime syntax, and paths with anonymous lifetime syntax is an exception to the simplest possible rule:
```rust
// Lint will not warn about these
fn(&u8) -> &'_ u8;
fn(&'_ u8) -> &u8;
fn(&u8) -> ContainsLifetime<'_>;
```
- Having a lint for consistent syntax of elided lifetimes will make the [future goal](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91639) of warning-by-default for paths participating in elision much simpler.
---
This new lint attempts to accomplish the goal of enforcing consistent syntax. In the process, it supersedes and replaces the existing `elided-named-lifetimes` lint, which means it starts out life as warn-by-default.
`tests/ui`: A New Order [4/N]
> [!NOTE]
>
> Intermediate commits are intended to help review, but will be squashed prior to merge.
r? ``@jieyouxu``
added stderr tag for commit which means it included generated stderr
Add match guard let chain drop order and scoping tests
We have a bunch of tests for if let chain drop order, but those tests don't cover match guard chains to the same depth. This PR adds the following tests:
* match guard equivalents of the if let chains tests in the `drop-order-comparisons.rs` test, added by #133605.
* match guard equivalent of the `mir_let_chains_drop_order.rs` test, added by #107251
* match guard equivalent of `temporary-early-drop.rs`, added by #133093
The added tests all have variants for 2021 and 2024, showing that the behavior on both editions matches that of if let chains on 2024.
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51114
```
error[E0610]: `{integer}` is a primitive type and therefore doesn't have fields
--> $DIR/attempted-access-non-fatal.rs:7:15
|
LL | let _ = 2.l;
| ^
|
help: if intended to be a floating point literal, consider adding a `0` after the period and a `f64` suffix
|
LL - let _ = 2.l;
LL + let _ = 2.0f64;
|
```
Implement `needs-subprocess` directive, and cleanup a bunch of tests to use `needs-{subprocess,threads}`
### Summary
Closes#128295.
- Implements `//@ needs-subprocess` directive in compiletest as requested in #128295. However, compiletest is a host tool, so we can't just try to spawn process because that spawns the process on *host*, not the *target*, under cross-compilation scenarios.
- The short-term solution is to add *Yet Another* list of allow-list targets.
- The long-term solution is to first check if a `$target` supports std, then try to run a binary to do run-time capability detection *on the target*. But that is tricky because you have to build-and-run a binary *for the target*.
- This PR picks the short-term solution, because the long-term solution is highly non-trivial, and it's already an improvement over individual `ignore-*`s all over the place.
- Opened an issue about the long-term solution in #135928.
- Documents `//@ needs-subprocess` in rustc-dev-guide.
- Replace `ignore-{wasm,wasm32,emscripten,sgx}` with `needs-{subprocess,threads}` where suitable in tests.
- Some drive-by test changes as I was trying to figure out if I could use `needs-{subprocess,threads}` and found some bits needlessly distracting.
Count of tests that use `ignore-{wasm,wasm32,emscripten,sgx}` before and after this PR:
| State | `ignore-sgx` | `ignore-wasm` | `ignore-emscripten` |
| - | - | - | - |
| Before this PR | 96 | 88 | 207 |
| After this PR | 36 | 38 | 61 |
<details>
<summary>Commands used to find out locally</summary>
```
--- before
[17:40] Joe:rust (fresh) | rg --no-ignore -l "ignore-sgx" tests | wc -l
96
[17:40] Joe:rust (fresh) | rg --no-ignore -l "ignore-wasm" tests | wc -l
88
[17:40] Joe:rust (fresh) | rg --no-ignore -l "ignore-emscripten" tests | wc -l
207
--- after
[17:39] Joe:rust (needs-subprocess-thread) | rg --no-ignore -l "ignore-sgx" tests | wc -l
36
[17:39] Joe:rust (needs-subprocess-thread) | rg --no-ignore -l "ignore-wasm" tests | wc -l
38
[17:39] Joe:rust (needs-subprocess-thread) | rg --no-ignore -l "ignore-emscripten" tests | wc -l
61
```
</details>
### Review advice
- Best reviewed commit-by-commit.
- Non-trivial test changes (not mechanically simple replacements) are split into individual commits to help with review. Their individual commit messages give some basic description of the changes.
- I *could* split some test changes out into another PR, but I found that I needed to change some tests to `needs-threads`, some to `needs-subprocess`, and some needed to use *both*, so they might conflict and become very annoying.
---
r? ``@ghost`` (need to run try jobs)
try-job: x86_64-msvc-1
try-job: i686-msvc-1
try-job: i686-mingw
try-job: x86_64-mingw-1
try-job: x86_64-apple-1
try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: aarch64-gnu
try-job: test-various
try-job: armhf-gnu
On lang, we've recently been discussing the drop order with respect to
`let` chains apropos of how we shortened temporary lifetimes in Rust
2024 and how we may shorten them further in the future.
Here we add an extensive set of tests that demonstrate the drop order
in the cases that interest us.
Properly record metavar spans for other expansions other than TT
This properly records metavar spans for nonterminals other than tokentree. This means that we operations like `span.to(other_span)` work correctly for macros. As you can see, other diagnostics involving metavars have improved as a result.
Fixes#132908
Alternative to #133270
cc `@ehuss`
cc `@petrochenkov`
