- Create hir_crate_items query which traverses tcx.hir_crate(()).owners to return a hir::ModuleItems
- use tcx.hir_crate_items in tcx.hir().items() to return an iterator of hir::ItemId
- add par_items(impl Fn(hir::ItemId)) to traverse all items in parallel
Signed-off-by: Miguel Guarniz <mi9uel9@gmail.com>
Improve method name suggestions
Attempts to improve method name suggestions when a matching method name
is not found. The approach taken is use the Levenshtein distance and
account for substrings having a high distance but can sometimes be very
close to the intended method (eg. empty vs is_empty).
resolves#94747
Do not use `ParamEnv::and` when building a cache key from a param-env and trait eval candidate
Do not use `ParamEnv::and` to cache a param-env with a selection/evaluation candidate.
This is because if the param-env is `RevealAll` mode, and the candidate looks global (i.e. it has erased regions, which can show up when we normalize a projection type under a binder<sup>1</sup>), then when we use `ParamEnv::and` to pair the candidate and the param-env for use as a cache key, we will throw away the param-env's caller bounds, and we'll end up caching a candidate that we inferred from the param-env with a empty param-env, which may cause cache-hit later when we have an empty param-env, and possibly mess with normalization like we see in the referenced issue during codegen.
Not sure how to trigger this with a more structured test, but changing `check-pass` to `build-pass` triggers the case that https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94903 detected.
<sup>1.</sup> That is, we will replace the late-bound region with a placeholder, which gets canonicalized and turned into an infererence variable, which gets erased during region freshening right before we cache the result. Sorry, it's quite a few steps.
Fixes#94903
r? `@Aaron1011` (or reassign as you see fit)
Don't emit non-asm contents error for naked function composed of errors
## Motivation
For naked functions an error is emitted when they are composed of anything other than a single asm!() block. However, this error triggers in a couple situations in which it adds no additional information or is actively misleading.
One example is if you do have an asm!() block but simply one with a syntax error:
```rust
#[naked]
unsafe extern "C" fn compiler_errors() {
asm!(invalid_syntax)
}
```
This results in two errors, one for the syntax error itself and another telling you that you need an asm block in your function:
```rust
error[E0787]: naked functions must contain a single asm block
--> src/main.rs:6:1
|
6 | / unsafe extern "C" fn naked_compile_error() {
7 | | asm!(blah)
8 | | }
| |_^
```
This issue also comes up when [utilizing `compile_error!()` for improving your diagnostics](https://twitter.com/steveklabnik/status/1509538243020218372), such as raising a compiler error when compiling for an unsupported target.
## Implementation
The rules this PR implements are as follows:
1. If any non-erroneous non-asm statement is included, an error will still occur
2. If multiple asm statements are included, an error will still occur
3. If 0 or 1 asm statements are present, as well as any non-zero number of erroneous statements, then this error will *not* be raised as it is likely either redundant or incorrect
The rule of thumb is effectively "if an error is present and its correction could change things, don't raise an error".
Attempts to improve method name suggestions when a matching method name
is not found. The approach taken is use the Levenshtein distance and
account for substrings having a high distance but can sometimes be very
close to the intended method (eg. empty vs is_empty).
Suggest `i += 1` when we see `i++` or `++i`
Closes#83502 (for `i++` and `++i`; `--i` should be covered by #82987, and `i--`
is tricky to handle).
This is a continuation of #83536.
r? `@estebank`
Fix multiline attributes handling in doctests
Fixes#55713.
I needed to have access to the `unclosed_delims` field in order to check that the attribute was completely parsed and didn't have missing parts, so I created a getter for it.
r? `@notriddle`
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #95587 (Remove need for associated_type_bounds in std.)
- #95589 (Include a header in .rlink files)
- #95593 (diagnostics: add test case for bogus T:Sized suggestion)
- #95597 (Refer to u8 by absolute path in expansion of thread_local)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Include a header in .rlink files
I couldn't find the right place where to put tests. Is there some location that tests `.rlink` creation and loading?
I only found `src/test/run-make-fulldeps/separate-link/Makefile`, but I'm not sure how to check the error message in the Makefile.
Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/95297
r? `@bjorn3`
Make GATs object safe under generic_associated_types_extended feature
Based on #94869
Let's say we have
```rust
trait StreamingIterator {
type Item<'a> where Self: 'a;
}
```
And `dyn for<'a> StreamingIterator<Item<'a> = &'a i32>`.
If we ask `(dyn for<'a> StreamingIterator<Item<'a> = &'a i32>): StreamingIterator`, then we have to prove that `for<'x> (&'x i32): Sized`. So, we generate *new* bound vars to subst for the GAT generics.
Importantly, this doesn't fully verify that these are usable and sound.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Add error message suggestion for missing noreturn in naked function
I had to google the syntax for inline asm's `noreturn` option when I got this error earlier today, so I figured I'd save others the trouble and add the syntax/fix as a suggestion in the error.
Handle rustc_const_stable attribute in library feature collector
The library feature collector in [compiler/rustc_passes/src/lib_features.rs](551b4fa395/compiler/rustc_passes/src/lib_features.rs) has only been looking at `#[stable(…)]`, `#[unstable(…)]`, and `#[rustc_const_unstable(…)]` attributes, while ignoring `#[rustc_const_stable(…)]`. The consequences of this were:
- When any const feature got stabilized (changing one or more `rustc_const_unstable` to `rustc_const_stable`), users who had previously enabled that unstable feature using `#![feature(…)]` would get told "unknown feature", rather than rustc's nicer "the feature … has been stable since … and no longer requires an attribute to enable".
This can be seen in the way that https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93957#issuecomment-1079794660 failed after rebase:
```console
error[E0635]: unknown feature `const_ptr_offset`
--> $DIR/offset_from_ub.rs:1:35
|
LL | #![feature(const_ptr_offset_from, const_ptr_offset)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
- We weren't enforcing that a particular feature is either stable everywhere or unstable everywhere, and that a feature that has been stabilized has the same stabilization version everywhere, both of which we enforce for the other stability attributes.
This PR updates the library feature collector to handle `rustc_const_stable`, and fixes places in the standard library and test suite where `rustc_const_stable` was being used in a way that does not meet the rules for a stability attribute.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #95032 (Clean up, categorize and sort unstable features in std.)
- #95260 (Better suggestions for `Fn`-family trait selection errors)
- #95293 (suggest wrapping single-expr blocks in square brackets)
- #95344 (Make `impl Debug for rustdoc::clean::Item` easier to read)
- #95388 (interpret: make isize::MAX the limit for dynamic value sizes)
- #95530 (rustdoc: do not show primitives and keywords as private)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
interpret: make isize::MAX the limit for dynamic value sizes
We are currently enforcing `data_layout.obj_size_bound()` as the maximal dynamic size of a Rust value (including for `size_of_val_raw`), but that does not match the docs.
In particular, Miri currently falsely says that this code has UB:
```rust
#![feature(layout_for_ptr)]
fn main() {
let size = isize::MAX as usize;
// Creating a raw slice of size isize::MAX and asking for its size is okay.
let s = std::ptr::slice_from_raw_parts(1usize as *const u8, size);
assert_eq!(size, unsafe { std::mem::size_of_val_raw(s) });
}
```
Better suggestions for `Fn`-family trait selection errors
1. Suppress suggestions to add `std::ops::Fn{,Mut,Once}` bounds when a type already implements `Fn{,Mut,Once}`
2. Add a note that points out that a type does in fact implement `Fn{,Mut,Once}`, but the arguments vary (either by number or by actual arguments)
3. Add a note that points out that a type does in fact implement `Fn{,Mut,Once}`, but not the right one (e.g. implements `FnMut`, but `Fn` is required).
Fixes#95147
Specialize infinite-type "insert some indirection" suggestion for Option
Suggest `Option<Box<_>>` instead of `Box<Option<_>>` for infinitely-recursive members of a struct.
Not sure if I can get the span of the generic subty of the Option so I can make this a `+++`-style suggestion. The current output is a tiny bit less fancy looking than the original suggestion.
Should I limit the specialization to just `Option<Box<TheOuterStruct>>`? Because right now it applies to all `Option` members in the struct that are returned by `Representability::SelfRecursive`.
Fixes#91402
r? `@estebank`
(since you wrote the original suggestion and are definitely most familiar with it!)
