Update check::cast::pointer_kind logic to new rustc
Make the match exhaustive, adding handling for anonymous types and
tuple coercions on the way.
Also, exit early when type errors are detected, to avoid error cascades
and the like.
Fixes#33690.
Fixes#46365.
Fixes#46880.
Convert warning about `*const _` to a future-compat lint
#46664 was merged before I could convert the soft warning about method lookup on `*const _` into a future-compatibility lint. This PR makes that change.
fixes#46837
tracking issue for the future-compatibility lint: #46906
r? @arielb1
Prevent unwinding past FFI boundaries
Second attempt to write a patch to solve this.
r? @nikomatsakis
~~So, my biggest issue with this patch is the way the patch determines *what* functions should have an abort landing pad (in `construct_fn`). I would ideally have this code match [src/librustc_trans/callee.rs::get_fn](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/librustc_trans/callee.rs#L107-L115) but couldn't find an id that returns true for `is_foreign_item`. Also tried `tcx.has_attr("unwind")` with no luck.~~ FIXED
Other issues:
* llvm.trap is an SIGILL on amd64. Ideally we could use panic-abort's version of aborting which is nicer but we don't want to depend on that library...
* ~~Mir inlining is a stub currently.~~ FIXED (no-op)
Also, when reviewing please take into account that I'm new to the code and only partially know what I'm doing... and that I've mostly made made matches on `TerminatorKind::Abort` match either `TerminatorKind::Resume` or `TerminatorKind::Unreachable` based on what looked best.
Make the match exhaustive, adding handling for anonymous types and
tuple coercions on the way.
Also, exit early when type errors are detected, to avoid error cascades
and the like.
Followup for #46112.
Sorting by crate-num should ensure that we favor `std::foo::bar` over
`any_other_crate::foo::bar`.
Interestingly, *this* change had a much larger impact on our internal
test suite than PR #46708 (which was my original fix to #46112).
Issue #46589 - Kill borrows on a local variable whenever we assign ov…
…er this variable
This is a first patch for the issue, handling the simple case while I figure out the data structures involved in the more complex cases.
Do not emit type errors on recovered blocks
When a parse error occurs on a block, the parser will recover and create
a block with the statements collected until that point. Now a flag
stating that a recovery has been performed in this block is propagated
so that the type checker knows that the type of the block (which will be
identified as `()`) shouldn't be checked against the expectation to
reduce the amount of irrelevant diagnostic errors shown to the user.
Fix#44579.
When a parse error occurs on a block, the parser will recover and create
a block with the statements collected until that point. Now a flag
stating that a recovery has been performed in this block is propagated
so that the type checker knows that the type of the block (which will be
identified as `()`) shouldn't be checked against the expectation to
reduce the amount of irrelevant diagnostic errors shown to the user.
Generics refactoring (groundwork for const generics)
These changes were suggested by @eddyb.
After this change, the `Generics` contain one `Vec` of an enum for the generic parameters, rather than two separate `Vec`s for lifetime and type parameters. Type params and const params will need to be in a shared `Vec` to preserve their ordering, and moving lifetimes into the same `Vec` should simplify the code that processes `Generics`.
tweaks and fixes for doc(include)
This PR makes a handful of changes around `#[doc(include="file.md")]` (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44732):
* Turns errors when loading files into full errors. This matches the original RFC text.
* Makes the `missing_docs` lint check for `#[doc(include="file.md")]` as well as regular `#[doc="text"]` attributes.
* Loads files included by `#[doc(include="file.md")]` into dep-info, mirroring the behavior of `include_str!()` and friends.
* Adds or modifies tests to check for all of these.
Prevent rustc overwriting input files
If rustc is invoked on a file that would be overwritten by the
compilation, the compilation now fails, to avoid accidental loss. This
resolves#13019. Kudos to @estebank, whose patch I finished off.
rustc: do not raise the alignment of optimized enums to the niche's alignment.
This is the improved fix for #46769 that does not increase the size of any types (see also #46808).
Fix ICE when calling non-functions within closures
The visitor for walking function bodies did not previously properly
handle error-cases for function calls. These are now ignored,
preventing the panic. This fixes#46771.
MIR: terminate unreachable blocks in construct_const
Fixes#46843.
#45821 added unreachable blocks in matches, which were terminated in
construct_fn but not in construct_const, causing a panic due to "no
terminator on block" when constants involved matching on enums.
The "unimplemented expression type" error may go away in the future, the
key is that we see the E0015 about using a non-const function and then
don't ICE.
The Generics now contain one Vec of an enum for the generic parameters,
rather than two separate Vec's for lifetime and type parameters.
Additionally, places that previously used Vec<LifetimeDef> now use
Vec<GenericParam> instead.
syntax: Follow-up to the incorrect qpath recovery PR
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/46788
Add tests checking that "priority" of qpath recovery is higher than priority of unary and binary operators
Fix regressed parsing of paths with fn-like generic arguments
r? @estebank
Implement non-mod.rs mod statements
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/45385, cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44660
This will fail tidy right now because it doesn't recognize my UI tests as feature-gate tests. However, I'm not sure if compile-fail will work out either because compile-fail usually requires there to be error patterns in the top-level file, which isn't possible with this feature. What's the recommended way to handle this?
