I am trying to add an implementation of `bitor` for `BTreeSet`. I think I am most of the way there, but I am going to need some guidance to take it all the way.
When I run `make check`, I get:
```
error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
self.union(_rhs).map(|&i| i).collect::<BTreeSet<T>>()
^~
```
I'd appreciate any nudges in the right direction. If I can figure this one out, I am sure I will be able to implement `bitand`, `bitxor`, and `sub` as well.
/cc @Gankro
---
**Update**
I have added implementations for `BitOr`, `BitAnd`, `BitXor`, and `Sub` for `BTreeSet`.
Add initial attempt at implementing BitOr for BTreeSet.
Update the implementation of the bitor operator for BTreeSets.
`make check` ran fine through this.
Add implementations for BitAnd, BitXor, and Sub as well.
Remove the FIXME comment and add unstable flags.
Add doctests for the bitop functions.
- Introduce a named type for the return type of `VecMap::move_iter`
- Rename all type parameters to `V` for "Value".
- Remove unnecessary call to an `Option::unwrap`, use pattern matching instead.
- Remove incorrect `Hash` implementation which took the `VecMap`'s capacity
into account.
This is a [breaking-change], however whoever used the `Hash` implementation
relied on an incorrect implementation.
Strings iterate to both char and &str, so it is natural it can also be extended or collected from an iterator of &str.
Apart from the trait implementations, `Extend<char>` is updated to use the iterator size hint, and the test added tests both the char and the &str versions of Extend and FromIterator.
I'm interested in including doctests for `BTreeMap`'s `iter_mut` and `into_iter` methods in this PR as well, but I am not sure of the best way to demonstrate/test what they do for the doctests.
- Introduce a named type for the return type of `VecMap::move_iter`
- Rename all type parameters to `V` for "Value".
- Remove unnecessary call to an `Option::unwrap`, use pattern matching instead.
- Remove incorrect `Hash` implementation which took the `VecMap`'s capacity
into account.
This is a [breaking-change], however whoever used the `Hash` implementation
relied on an incorrect implementation.
Change Example to Examples.
Add a doctest that better demonstrates the utility of as_string.
Update the doctest example to use String instead of &String.
This change makes the compiler no longer infer whether types (structures
and enumerations) implement the `Copy` trait (and thus are implicitly
copyable). Rather, you must implement `Copy` yourself via `impl Copy for
MyType {}`.
A new warning has been added, `missing_copy_implementations`, to warn
you if a non-generic public type has been added that could have
implemented `Copy` but didn't.
For convenience, you may *temporarily* opt out of this behavior by using
`#![feature(opt_out_copy)]`. Note though that this feature gate will never be
accepted and will be removed by the time that 1.0 is released, so you should
transition your code away from using it.
This breaks code like:
#[deriving(Show)]
struct Point2D {
x: int,
y: int,
}
fn main() {
let mypoint = Point2D {
x: 1,
y: 1,
};
let otherpoint = mypoint;
println!("{}{}", mypoint, otherpoint);
}
Change this code to:
#[deriving(Show)]
struct Point2D {
x: int,
y: int,
}
impl Copy for Point2D {}
fn main() {
let mypoint = Point2D {
x: 1,
y: 1,
};
let otherpoint = mypoint;
println!("{}{}", mypoint, otherpoint);
}
This is the backwards-incompatible part of #13231.
Part of RFC #3.
[breaking-change]
(I don't understand why this works, and so I don't quite trust this yet. I'm pushing it up to see if anyone else can replicate this performance increase)
Somehow llvm is able to optimize this version of Vec::reserve into dramatically faster than the old version. In micro-benchmarks this was 2-10 times faster. It also reduce my Rust compile time from 41 minutes to 27 minutes.
Closes#19281.
Now that we have an overloaded comparison (`==`) operator, and that `Vec`/`String` deref to `[T]`/`str` on method calls, many `as_slice()`/`as_mut_slice()`/`to_string()` calls have become redundant. This patch removes them. These were the most common patterns:
- `assert_eq(test_output.as_slice(), "ground truth")` -> `assert_eq(test_output, "ground truth")`
- `assert_eq(test_output, "ground truth".to_string())` -> `assert_eq(test_output, "ground truth")`
- `vec.as_mut_slice().sort()` -> `vec.sort()`
- `vec.as_slice().slice(from, to)` -> `vec.slice(from_to)`
---
Note that e.g. `a_string.push_str(b_string.as_slice())` has been left untouched in this PR, since we first need to settle down whether we want to favor the `&*b_string` or the `b_string[]` notation.
This is rebased on top of #19167
cc @alexcrichton @aturon
There is already a test for `union` in the test namespace, but this commit adds a doctest that will appear in the rustdocs.
Someone on IRC said, *Write doctests!*, so here I am.
I am not sure this is the best way to demonstrate the behavior of the union function, so I am open to suggestions for improving this. If I am on the right track I'd be glad to include similar doctests for `intersection`, `difference`, etc.
In regards to:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/19253#issuecomment-64836729
This commit:
* Changes the #deriving code so that it generates code that utilizes fewer
reexports (in particur Option::* and Result::*), which is necessary to
remove those reexports in the future
* Changes other areas of the codebase so that fewer reexports are utilized
Add a rustdoc test for union to exhibit how it is used.
There is already a test for union in the test namespace, but this commit
adds a doctest that will appear in the rustdocs.
Add a doctest for the difference function.
Add a doctest for the symmetric_difference function.
Add a doctest for the intersection function.
Update the union et al. doctests based on @Gankro's comments.
Make the union et al. doctests a bit more readable.
Somehow llvm is able to optimize this version of Vec::reserve
into dramatically faster than the old version. In micro-benchmarks
this was 2-10 times faster. It also shaved 14 minutes off of
rust's compile times.
Closes#19281.
Part of #18424
Adds `capacity()` function to VecMap, as per the collections reform.
(Salvaged from #19516, #19523, while we await an RFC regarding `reserve`/`reserve_index` for `VecMap`)
pop calls siftdown, siftdown calls siftdown_range, and siftdown_range
loops on an index that can start as low as 0 and approximately doubles
each iteration.
