rustdoc: remove legacy box-sizing CSS
According to [caniuse], these vendor prefixes aren't needed in any supported web browsers as defined in [RFC 1985]
* The last version of Chrome that required a vendor prefix was version 9. The current version is 108.
* Firefox 28 is the last version that required a vendor prefix. The [current Firefox ESR] is version 102.
* The last version of Safari that required a vendor prefix was version 5. The current version is 16.
* The last version of Safari/iOS that required a vendor prefix was version 4. The current version is 16.
* Edge never required vendor prefixes.
* UCAndroid never required vendor prefixes.
[caniuse]: https://caniuse.com/?search=box-sizing
[RFC 1985]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/1985-tiered-browser-support.html
[current Firefox ESR]: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Releases
According to [caniuse], these vendor prefixes aren't needed in any
supported web browsers as defined in [RFC 1985]
* The last version of Chrome that required a vendor prefix was version 9.
The current version is 108.
* Firefox 28 is the last version that required a vendor prefix. The
[current Firefox ESR] is version 102.
* The last version of Safari that required a vendor prefix was version 5.
The current version is 16.
* The last version of Safari/iOS that required a vendor prefix was version 4.
The current version is 16.
* Edge never required vendor prefixes.
* UCAndroid never required vendor prefixes.
[caniuse]: https://caniuse.com/?search=box-sizing
[RFC 1985]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/1985-tiered-browser-support.html
[current Firefox ESR]: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Releases
This mostly reverts 468acca108, while still
fixing the problem it fixed by using an internal list-style-position. It
results in a slight change in the hover indicator, but nothing misleading.
rustdoc: remove redundant CSS `.source .content { overflow: visible }`
When added in 7669f04fb0 / #16066, the page itself was set to scroll. Now it's set so that the `example-wrap` is scrolling inside the page, so the overflow setting for the content is irrelevant.
Migrate more scraped examples CSS rules to CSS variables
It's based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106218 so it will need to wait for it to be merged first.
r? `@notriddle`
When added in 7669f04fb0 / #16066, the page
itself was set to scroll. Now it's set so that the `example-wrap` is
scrolling inside the page, so the overflow setting for the content is
irrelevant.
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #104531 (Provide a better error and a suggestion for `Fn` traits with lifetime params)
- #105899 (`./x doc library --open` opens `std`)
- #106190 (Account for multiple multiline spans with empty padding)
- #106202 (Trim more paths in obligation types)
- #106234 (rustdoc: simplify settings, help, and copy button CSS by not reusing)
- #106236 (docs/test: add docs and a UI test for `E0514` and `E0519`)
- #106259 (Update Clippy)
- #106260 (Fix index out of bounds issues in rustdoc)
- #106263 (Formatter should not try to format non-Rust files)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Since there remains only one common CSS rule shared between them, there's
no point to it: the block and selector costs more than the single `width`
rule saves.
This PR makes the `464px` version of `#src-sidebar-toggle` the same as the
`700px` version, with the button lower on the page so that it doesn't cover
up the search form, and removes the left margin to make space for it.
rustdoc: remove no-op CSS from `.docblock-short`
The rules `overflow:hidden` and `text-overflow:ellipses` only have an effect if overflow occurs, which cannot happen because it will just line wrap instead.
These rules definitely became obsolete by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/77699, when the stylesheet was decidedly changed to have line wrapping in short docblocks, but given the bug it was fixing, this probably got broken earlier.
The rules `overflow:hidden` and `text-overflow:ellipses` only have an
effect if overflow occurs, which cannot happen because it will just line
wrap instead.
These rules definitely became obsolete by
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/77699, when the stylesheet was
decidedly changed to have line wrapping in short docblocks, but given the
bug it was fixing, this probably got broken earlier.
This renames the ID, which is only used in search results, to
`#search-tabs`. Also changes the `.count` to a span, so it doesn't need its
display mode to be overridden.
rustdoc: simplify CSS and DOM for more-scraped-examples
This gets rid of the more-scraped-examples-inner wrapper, instead nesting the children directly and using absolute positioning for the toggle line.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #104741 (Switch `#[track_caller]` back to a no-op unless feature gate is enabled)
- #105769 (add function to tell the identical errors for ambiguity_errors)
- #105843 (Suggest associated const on possible capitalization mistake)
- #105966 (Re-enable `Fn` trait call notation error for non-tuple argument)
- #106002 (codegen tests: adapt patterns to also work with v0 symbol mangling)
- #106010 (Give opaque types a better coherence error)
- #106016 (rustdoc: simplify link anchor to section expand JS)
- #106024 (Fix ICE due to `todo!()` in `rustdoc` for `Term`s)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Fix ICE due to `todo!()` in `rustdoc` for `Term`s
Left a todo awhile ago (I think), so fill it in to print a const for `Term`s.
Fixes#105952.
Should I add some annotations to the rustdoc test?
Fix impl block in const expr
Fixes#83026.
The problem was that we didn't visit block expressions. Considering how big the [walk_expr](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/src/rustc_hir/intravisit.rs.html#678) function is, I decided to instead implement the `hir` visitor on the struct. It also answers the question which was in a comment for `RustdocVisitor`: we should have used a visitor instead of our ad-hoc implementation.
Adding this visitor also added some extra checks that weren't present before (check changes in `rustdoc-ui` tests).
r? `@notriddle`
