Some "parenthesis" and "parentheses" fixes
"Parenthesis" is the singular (e.g. one `(` or one `)`) and "parentheses" is the plural (multiple `(` or `)`s) and this is not hard to mix up so here are some fixes for that.
Inspired by #89958
Move top part of print_item to Tera templates
Part of #84419.
This moves the first line of each item page (E.g. `Struct foo::Bar .... 1.0.0 [-][src]` into a Tera template.
I also moved template initialization into its own module and added a small macro to reduce duplication and opportunity for errors.
Fix invalid HTML generation for higher bounds
Considering this is a bug, I cherry-picked the commit from #89676 so it's merged more quickly.
r? ``@notriddle``
Prevent error reporting from outputting a recursion error if it finds an ambiguous trait impl during suggestions
Closes#89275
This fixes the compiler reporting a recursion error during another already in progress error by trying to make a conversion method suggestion and encounters ambiguous trait implementations that can convert a the original type into a type that can then be recursively converted into itself via another method in the trait.
Updated OverflowError struct to be an enum so I could differentiate between passes - it's no longer a ZST but I don't think that should be a problem as they only generate when there's an error in compiling code anyway
Make cfg imply doc(cfg)
This is a reopening of #79341, rebased and modified a bit (we made a lot of refactoring in rustdoc's types so they needed to be reflected in this PR as well):
* `hidden_cfg` is now in the `Cache` instead of `DocContext` because `cfg` information isn't stored anymore on `clean::Attributes` type but instead computed on-demand, so we need this information in later parts of rustdoc.
* I removed the `bool_to_options` feature (which makes the code a bit simpler to read for `SingleExt` trait implementation.
* I updated the version for the feature.
There is only one thing I couldn't figure out: [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79341#discussion_r561855624)
> I think I'll likely scrap the whole `SingleExt` extension trait as the diagnostics for 0 and >1 items should be different.
How/why should they differ?
EDIT: this part has been solved, the current code was fine, just needed a little simplification.
cc `@Nemo157`
r? `@jyn514`
Original PR description:
This is only active when the `doc_cfg` feature is active.
The implicit cfg can be overridden via `#[doc(cfg(...))]`, so e.g. to hide a `#[cfg]` you can use something like:
```rust
#[cfg(unix)]
#[doc(cfg(all()))]
pub struct Unix;
```
By adding `#![doc(cfg_hide(foobar))]` to the crate attributes the cfg `#[cfg(foobar)]` (and _only_ that _exact_ cfg) will not be implicitly treated as a `doc(cfg)` to render a message in the documentation.
librustdoc: Use correct heading levels.
Closes#89309
This fixes the `<h#>` header tags throughout the docs to reflect a semantic hierarchy.
- I ran a script to manually check that we don't have any files with multiple `<h1>` tags.
- Also checked that we never incorrectly nest e.g. a `<h2>` under an `<h3>`.
- I also spot-checked a bunch of pages (`trait.Read`, `enum.Ordering`, `primitive.isize`, `trait.Iterator`).
By adding #![doc(cfg_hide(foobar))] to the crate attributes the cfg
#[cfg(foobar)] (and _only_ that _exact_ cfg) will not be implicitly
treated as a doc(cfg) to render a message in the documentation.
This is only active when the `doc_cfg` feature is active.
The implicit cfg can be overridden via #[doc(cfg(...))], so e.g. to
hide a #[cfg] you can use something like:
```rust
#[cfg(unix)]
#[doc(cfg(all()))]
pub struct Unix;
```
(since `all()` is always true, it is never shown in the docs)
