convert AdtDef::destructor to on-demand
This removes the `Cell` from `AdtDef`. Also, moving destructor validity
checking to on-demand (forced during item-type checking) ensures that
invalid destructors can't cause ICEs.
Fixes#38868.
Fixes#40132.
r? @eddyb
transition borrowck to visit all **bodies** and not item-likes
This is a better structure for incremental compilation and also more compatible with the eventual borrowck mir. It also fixes#38520 as a drive-by fix.
r? @eddyb
This removes the Cell from AdtDef. Also, moving destructor validity
checking to on-demand (forced during item-type checking) ensures that
invalid destructors can't cause ICEs.
Fixes#38868.
Fixes#40132.
The types of statics, like all other items, are stored in the tcx
unnormalized. This is necessarily so, because
a) Item types other than statics have generics, which can't be
normalized.
b) Eager normalization causes undesirable on-demand dependencies.
Keeping with the principle that MIR lvalues require no normalization in
order to interpret, this patch stores the normalized type of the statics
in the Lvalue and reads it to get the lvalue type.
Fixes#39367.
Make transmuting from fn item types to pointer-sized types a hard error.
Closes#19925 by removing the future compatibility lint and the associated workarounds.
This is a `[breaking-change]` if you `transmute` from a function item without casting first.
For more information on how to fix your code, see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/19925.
Move two large error_reporting fn's to a separate file
Hello!
I tried to make `librustc/infer/error_reporting,rs` more readable by modularizing it and moving its two largest functions to a separate file.
If you have any suggestions, please send it right away! 🚀
Thanks goes to @nikomatsakis for supporting.
librustc error_reporting.rs cleanup.
Read some code in librustc, mainly in error_reporting.rs, and cleaned up some things along the way. I recommend looking at each commit individually or looking at the [whitespace insensitive diff](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/39977/files?w=1).
add `-C overflow-checks` option
In addition to defining and handling the new option, we also add a method on librustc::Session for determining the necessity of overflow checks. This method provides a single point to sort out the three (!) different ways for turning on overflow checks: -C debug-assertions, -C overflow-checks, and -Z force-overflow-checks.
I was seeing a [run-pass/issue-28950.rs](b1363a73ed/src/test/run-pass/issue-28950.rs) failure on my machine with these patches, but I was also seeing the failure without the changes to the core compiler. We'll see what travis says.
Fixes#33134. r? @alexcrichton
