Rustdoc remove old style files
Reopening of #56577 (which I can't seem to reopen...).
I made the flag unstable so with this change, what was blocking the PR is now gone I assume.
Fixes rustdoc in stage 0, stage 1
When a request for rustdoc is passed for stage 0, x.py build --stage 0
src/tools/rustdoc or ensure(tool::Rustdoc { .. }) with top_stage = 0, we
return the rustdoc for that compiler (i.e., the beta rustdoc).
This fixes stage 0 of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52186 as well as being part of general workflow improvements (making stage 0 testing for std work) for rustbuild.
The stage 1 fix (second commit) completely resolves the problem, so this fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52186.
The RUSTDOC_LIBDIR should be rustc_libdir, not sysroot_libdir; rustdoc
is like the compiler and should link against rustc's libdir.
Some people currently (i.e., in general, may not be on master) have doc
tests working, but no attempt to determine why has been attempted.
When a request for rustdoc is passed for stage 0, x.py build --stage 0
src/tools/rustdoc or ensure(tool::Rustdoc { .. }) with top_stage = 0, we
return the rustdoc for that compiler (i.e., the beta rustdoc).
NVPTX target specification
This change adds a built-in `nvptx64-nvidia-cuda` GPGPU no-std target specification and a basic PTX assembly smoke tests.
The approach is taken here and the target spec is based on `ptx-linker`, a project started about 1.5 years ago. Key feature: bitcode object files being linked with LTO into the final module on the linker's side.
Prior to this change, the linker used a `ld` linker-flavor, but I think, having the special CLI convention is a more reliable way.
Questions about further progress on reliable CUDA workflow with Rust:
1. Is it possible to create a test suite `codegen-asm` to verify end-to-end integration with LLVM backend?
1. How would it be better to organise no-std `compile-fail` tests: add `#![no_std]` where possible and mark others as `ignore-nvptx` directive, or alternatively, introduce `compile-fail-no-std` test suite?
1. Can we have the `ptx-linker` eventually be integrated as `rls` or `clippy`? Hopefully, this should allow to statically link against LLVM used in Rust and get rid of the [current hacky solution](https://github.com/denzp/rustc-llvm-proxy).
1. Am I missing some methods from `rustc_codegen_ssa:🔙:linker::Linker` that can be useful for bitcode-only linking?
Currently, there are no major public CUDA projects written in Rust I'm aware of, but I'm expecting to have a built-in target will create a solid foundation for further experiments and awesome crates.
Related to #38789Fixes#38787Fixes#38786
compiletest: Support opt-in Clang-based run-make tests and use them for testing xLTO.
Some cross-language run-make tests need a Clang compiler that matches the LLVM version of `rustc`. Since such a compiler usually isn't available these tests (marked with the `needs-matching-clang`
directive) are ignored by default.
For some CI jobs we do need these tests to run unconditionally though. In order to support this a `--force-clang-based-tests` flag is added to compiletest. If this flag is specified, `compiletest` will fail if it can't detect an appropriate version of Clang.
@rust-lang/infra The PR doesn't yet enable the tests yet. Do you have any recommendation for which jobs to enable them?
cc #57438
r? @alexcrichton
Do not set CC, CFLAGS, CXX, CXXFLAGS, AR, RANLIB in bootstrap, it breaks cross compilation
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57812
I tested it in AArch64 Ubuntu container with several days old tree to have all the tools buildable.
I did **not** test native builds (amd64 -> amd64), leaving it to CI.
r? @alexcrichton
Using CC, CFLAGS, CXX, CXXFLAGS, AR and RANLIB breaks cross compilation
because host is built first and has correct values. The same
values are incorrect for the target however.
This commit works around the newly-introduced LLVM shared library.
This is needed such that llvm-config run from
librustc_llvm's build script can correctly locate it's own LLVM, not the
one in stage0/lib. The LLVM build system uses the DT_RUNPATH/RUNPATH
header within the llvm-config binary, which we want to use, but because
Cargo always adds the host compiler's "libdir" (stage0/lib in our
case) to the dynamic linker's search path, we weren't properly finding
the freshly-built LLVM in llvm/lib. By restoring the environment
variable setting the search path to what bootstrap sees, the problem is
resolved and librustc_llvm correctly links and finds the appropriate
LLVM.
Several run-make-fulldeps tests are also updated with similar handling.
The new git submodule src/llvm-project is a monorepo replacing src/llvm
and src/tools/{clang,lld,lldb}. This also serves as a rebase for these
projects to the new 8.x branch from trunk.
The src/llvm-emscripten fork is unchanged for now.
Install missing 'rust-gdbui''
PR #53774 added `rust-gdbui` as wrapper to launch [gdbui](https://gdbgui.com/), similar to `rust-gdb`.
Unfortunately I've never seen the script in my local installation (from rustup, using rust 1.31.1). @tromey on the PR [suggested it might be missing](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/53774#issuecomment-419704939) from the installation process.
This PR simply adds a line for `rust-gdbui` too.
[rustbuild] Rebuild std after changes to codegen backends
Use `clear_if_dirty` on std for backend changes, just as we do for
changes to rustc itself, so new codegen is correctly applied to all
later compiler stages.
Fixes#48298.
Use `clear_if_dirty` on std for backend changes, just as we do for
changes to rustc itself, so new codegen is correctly applied to all
later compiler stages.
Fixes#48298.
Use CMAKE_{C,CXX}_COMPILER_LAUNCHER for ccache
CMake 3.4 and newer which is the required minimum version for LLVM
supports CMAKE_{C,CXX}_COMPILER_LAUNCHER for settting the compiler
launcher such as ccache which doesn't require shifting arguments.
This fixes a mistake where miri was accidentally left out of the
build-manifest parsing, meaning that today's nightly generated a
manifest with invalid urls!
