Ignore ZST offsets when deciding whether to use Scalar/ScalarPair layout
This is important because Scalar/ScalarPair layout previously would not be used if any ZST had nonzero offset.
For example, before this change, only `((), u128)` would be laid out like `u128`, not `(u128, ())`.
Fixes#63244
Fix#76803 miscompilation
Fixes#76803
Seems like it was an oversight that the discriminant value being set was not compared to the target value from the SwitchInt, as a comment says this is a requirement for the optimization to be sound.
r? `@wesleywiser` since you are probably familiar with the optimization and made #76837 to workaround the bug
Suggest `const_fn_transmute`, not `const_fn`
More fallout from #76850 in the vein of #77134. The fix is the same. I looked through the structured errors file and didn't see any more of this kind of diagnostics bug.
r? @oli-obk
Suggest `const_mut_refs`, not `const_fn` for mutable references in `const fn`
Resolves#77134.
Prior to #76850, most uses of `&mut` in `const fn` ~~required~~ involved two feature gates, `const_mut_refs` and `const_fn`. The first allowed all mutable borrows of locals. The second allowed only locals, arguments and return values whose types contained `&mut`. I switched the second check to the `const_mut_refs` gate. However, I forgot update the error message with the new suggestion.
Alternatively, we could revert to having two different feature gates for this. OP's code never borrows anything mutably, so it didn't need `const_mut_refs` in the past, only `const_fn`. I'd prefer to keep everything under a single gate, however.
r? @oli-obk
Allow a unique name to be assigned to dataflow graphviz output
Previously, if the same analysis were invoked multiple times in a single compilation session, the graphviz output for later runs would overwrite that of previous runs. Allow callers to add a unique identifier to each run so this can be avoided.
Stabilize intra-doc links
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/43466
Thanks to the great work of `@jyn514` in getting the [cross-crate reexport issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65983) in intra-rustdoc links fixed, I think we're now in a position to stabilize this feature.
The tracking issue currently has two unresolved issues:
- <s>behavior around doc(hidden): This is fixed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73365, which is just waiting for CI and should land tomorrow. It's also a pretty niche bug so while I expect it to land soon I don't think we need to block stabilization on it anyway.</s>
- Non-identifier primitive types like slices: This was not a part of the original RFC anyway, and is a pretty niche use case
The feature itself, sans https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65983, has been shipped on nightly for three years now, with people using it on docs.rs. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65983 itself is not an overwhelmingly central bit of functionality; the reason we elected to block stabilization on it was that back in 2017 it was not possible to fix the issue without some major refactorings of resolve, and we did not want to stabilize something that had such a potentially unfixable bug.
Given that we've fixed it, I see no reason to delay stabilization on this long awaited feature. It's possible that the latest patches have problems, however we _have_ done crater runs of some of the crucial parts. Furthermore, that's what the release trains are for, we will have a solid three months to let it ride the trains before it actually hits the stable compiler.
r? `@rust-lang/rustdoc`
revert const_type_id stabilization
This reverts #72488, which is currently on beta and scheduled to stabilize in `1.47.0`, based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75923#issuecomment-696676511
It turns out we might not be quite ready to stabilize `TypeId` in const contexts before having a chance to rework its internals. Since `TypeId` is a bit of an oddity we want to be careful about how those internals are currently being relied on while making changes. That will be easier to do without having to also consider compile-time contexts.
r? `@eddyb`
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #76898 (Record `tcx.def_span` instead of `item.span` in crate metadata)
- #76939 (emit errors during AbstractConst building)
- #76965 (Add cfg(target_has_atomic_equal_alignment) and use it for Atomic::from_mut.)
- #76993 (Changing the alloc() to accept &self instead of &mut self)
- #76994 (fix small typo in docs and comments)
- #77017 (Add missing examples on Vec iter types)
- #77042 (Improve documentation for ToSocketAddrs)
- #77047 (Miri: more informative deallocation error messages)
- #77055 (Add #[track_caller] to more panicking Cell functions)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
MIR pass to remove unneeded drops on types not needing drop
This is heavily dependent on MIR inlining running to actually see the drop statement.
Do we want to special case replacing a call to std::mem::drop with a goto aswell?
Add `rc_buffer` lint for checking Rc<String> and friends
Fixes#2623
This is a bit different from the original PR attempting to implement this type of lint. Rather than linting against converting into the unwanted types, this PR lints against declaring the unwanted type in a struct or function definition.
I'm reasonably happy with what I have here, although I used the fully qualified type names for the Path and OsString suggestions, and I'm not sure if I should have just used the short versions instead, even if they might not have been declared via use.
Also, I don't know if "buffer type" is the best way to put it or not. Alternatively I could call it a "growable type" or "growable buffer type", but I was thinking of PathBuf when I started making the lint.
changelog: Add `rc_buffer` lint
Add cfg(target_has_atomic_equal_alignment) and use it for Atomic::from_mut.
Fixes some platform-specific problems with #74532 by using the actual alignment of the types instead of hardcoding a few `target_arch`s.
r? @RalfJung
emit errors during AbstractConst building
There changes are currently still untested, so I don't expect this to pass CI 😆
It seems to me like this is the direction we want to go in, though we didn't have too much of a discussion about this.
r? @oli-obk
Record `tcx.def_span` instead of `item.span` in crate metadata
This was missed in PR #75465. As a result, a few places have been using
the full body span of functions, instead of just the header span.
Don't download/sync llvm-project submodule if download-ci-llvm is set
llvm-project takes > 1GB storage space and a long time to download.
It's better to not download it unless needed.
SimplifyComparisonIntegral: fix miscompilation
Fixes#76432
Only insert StorageDeads if we actually removed one.
Fixes an issue where we added StorageDead to a place with no StorageLive
r? `@oli-obk`
Remove `qualify_min_const_fn`
~~Blocked on #76807 (the first six commits).~~
With this PR, all checks in `qualify_min_const_fn` are replicated in `check_consts`, and the former is no longer invoked. My goal was to have as few changes to test output as possible, since making sweeping changes to the code *while* doing big batches of diagnostics updates turned out to be a headache. To this end, there's a few `HACK`s in `check_consts` to achieve parity with `qualify_min_const_fn`.
The new system that replaces `is_min_const_fn` is referred to as "const-stability" My end goal for the const-stability rules is this:
* Const-stability is only applicable to functions defined in `staged_api` crates.
* All functions not marked `rustc_const_unstable` are considered "const-stable".
- NB. This is currently not implemented. `#[unstable]` functions are also const-unstable. This causes problems when searching for feature gates.
- All "const-unstable" functions have an associated feature gate
* const-stable functions can only call other const-stable functions
- `allow_internal_unstable` can be used to circumvent this.
* All const-stable functions are subject to some additional checks (the ones that were unique to `qualify_min_const_fn`)
The plan is to remove each `HACK` individually in subsequent PRs. That way, changes to error message output can be reviewed in isolation.
Don't dynamically link LLVM tools unless rustc is too
This PR initially tried to support link-shared on all of our target platforms (other than Windows), but ran into a number of difficulties:
* LLVM doesn't really support a shared link on macOS (llvm-config runs into problems with the version suffix)
* LLVM doesn't seem to support a shared link when cross-compiling (the libLLVM.so ends up empty and symbols are not found)
So, this PR has now been revised such that we don't attempt to dynamically link LLVM tools (even if that would, otherwise, be supported) on targets where LLVM is statically linked to rustc. Currently that's basically everything except for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (where we dynamically link to avoid rerunning ThinLTO in each stage).
Follow-up to #76708.
Fixes#76698.
Add a changelog for x.py and nag contributors until they read it
Add a changelog for x.py
- Add a changelog and instructions for updating it
- Use `changelog-seen` in `config.toml` and `VERSION` in bootstrap to determine whether the changelog has been read. There's no way to tie reading the changelog to updating the version, so unfortunately they still have to update `config.toml` manually. Actually reading the changelog is optional, anyone can set `changelog-seen = N` without reading (although it's not recommended).
- Nag people if they haven't read the x.py changelog
+ Print message twice to make sure it's seen
- Give different error messages depending on whether the version needs to be updated or added
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76617
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Fix cross compiling dist/build invocations
I am uncertain why the first commit is not affecting CI. I suspect it's because we pass --disable-docs on most of our cross-compilation builders. The second commit doesn't affect CI because CI runs x.py dist, not x.py build.
Both commits are standalone; together they should resolve#76733. The first commit doesn't really fix that issue but rather just fixes cross-compiled x.py dist, resolving a bug introduced in #76549.
Use const-checking to forbid use of unstable features in const-stable functions
First step towards #76618.
Currently this code isn't ever hit because `qualify_min_const_fn` runs first and catches pretty much everything. One exception is `const_precise_live_drops`, which does not use the newly added code since it runs as part of a separate pass.
Also contains some unrelated refactoring, which is split into separate commits.
r? @oli-obk
