Improve wording of "cannot multiply" type error
For example, if you had this code:
fn foo(x: i32, y: f32) -> f32 {
x * y
}
You would get this error:
error[E0277]: cannot multiply `f32` to `i32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x * y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
|
= help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
However, that's not usually how people describe multiplication. People
usually describe multiplication like how the division error words it:
error[E0277]: cannot divide `i32` by `f32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x / y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 / f32`
|
= help: the trait `Div<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
So that's what this change does. It changes this:
error[E0277]: cannot multiply `f32` to `i32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x * y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
|
= help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
To this:
error[E0277]: cannot multiply `i32` by `f32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x * y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
|
= help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
Trait predicate ambiguities are not always in `Self`
When reporting ambiguities in trait predicates, the compiler incorrectly assumed the ambiguity was always in the type the trait should be implemented on, and never the generic parameters of the trait. This caused silly suggestions for predicates like `<KnownType as Trait<_>>`, such as giving explicit types to completely unrelated variables that happened to be of type `KnownType`.
This also reverts #73027, which worked around this issue in some cases and does not appear to be necessary any more.
fixes#77982fixes#78055
For example, if you had this code:
fn foo(x: i32, y: f32) -> f32 {
x * y
}
You would get this error:
error[E0277]: cannot multiply `f32` to `i32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x * y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
|
= help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
However, that's not usually how people describe multiplication. People
usually describe multiplication like how the division error words it:
error[E0277]: cannot divide `i32` by `f32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x / y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 / f32`
|
= help: the trait `Div<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
So that's what this change does. It changes this:
error[E0277]: cannot multiply `f32` to `i32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x * y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
|
= help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
To this:
error[E0277]: cannot multiply `i32` by `f32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x * y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
|
= help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
Suggest correct place to add `self` parameter when inside closure
It would incorrectly suggest adding it as a parameter to the closure instead of the containing function.
[For example](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=1936bcd1e5f981573386e0cee985c3c0):
```
help: add a `self` receiver parameter to make the associated `fn` a method
|
5 | let _ = || self&self;
| ^^^^^
```
`DiagnosticMetadata.current_function` is only used for these messages so tweaking its behavior should be ok.
Fix grammar in note for orphan-rule error [E0210]
Fixes the grammar in the error note for [E0210] from:
_"= note: implementing a foreign trait is only possible if at least one of the types for which **is it** implemented is local"_
to:
_"= note: implementing a foreign trait is only possible if at least one of the types for which **it is** implemented is local"_
The content of this commit is the result of running the following command at the repository root:
`find . \( -type d -name .git -prune \) -o -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i 's/which is it implemented/which it is implemented/g'`
Suggest minimal subset features in `incomplete_features` lint
This tells users that we have a minimal subset feature of it and they can fix the lint warning without allowing it.
The wording improvement is helpful :)
Fixes#77913
resolve: further improvements to "try using the enum's variant" diagnostic
Follow-up on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/77341#issuecomment-702738281.
This PR improves the diagnostic modified in #77341 to suggest not only those variants which do not have fields, but those with fields (by suggesting with placeholders). In addition, the wording of the tuple-variant-only case is improved slightly.
I've not made further changes to the tuple-variant-only case (e.g. to only suggest variants with the correct number of fields) because I don't think I have enough information to do so reliably (e.g. in the case where there is an attempt to construct a tuple variant, I have no information on how many fields were provided; and in the case of pattern matching, I only have a slice of spans and would need to check for things like `..` in those spans, which doesn't seem worth it).
r? @estebank
This commit improves the tuple struct case added in rust-lang/rust#77341
so that the context is mentioned in more of the message.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
This commit improves the diagnostic modified in rust-lang/rust#77341 to
suggest not only those variants which do not have fields, but those with
fields (by suggesting with placeholders).
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
The primary motivation is to get the changes from
https://github.com/tokio-rs/tracing/pull/990. Example output:
```
$ RUSTDOC_LOG=debug rustdoc +rustc2
warning: some trace filter directives would enable traces that are disabled statically
| `debug` would enable the DEBUG level for all targets
= note: the static max level is `info`
= help: to enable DEBUG logging, remove the `max_level_info` feature
```
- Remove useless test
This was testing for an ICE when passing `RUST_LOG=rustc_middle`. I
noticed it because it started giving the tracing warning (because tests
are not run with debug-logging enabled). Since this bug seems unlikely
to re-occur, I just removed it altogether.
resolve: improve "try using the enum's variant"
Fixes#73427.
This PR improves the "try using the enum's variant" suggestion:
- Variants in suggestions would not result in more errors (e.g. use of a struct variant is only suggested if the suggestion can trivially construct that variant). Therefore, suggestions are only emitted for variants that have no fields (since the suggestion can't know what value fields would have).
- Suggestions include the syntax for constructing the variant. If a struct or tuple variant is suggested, then it is constructed in the suggestion - unless in pattern-matching or when arguments are already provided.
- A help message is added which mentions the variants which are no longer suggested.
All of the diagnostic logic introduced by this PR is separated from the normal code path for a successful compilation.
r? `@estebank`
Add some regression tests
Closes#66501Closes#68951Closes#72565Closes#74244Closes#75299
The first issue is fixed in 1.43.0, other issues are fixed in the recent nightly.
Split sys_common::Mutex in StaticMutex and MovableMutex.
The (unsafe) `Mutex` from `sys_common` had a rather complicated interface. You were supposed to call `init()` manually, unless you could guarantee it was neither moved nor used reentrantly.
Calling `destroy()` was also optional, although it was unclear if 1) resources might be leaked or not, and 2) if `destroy()` should only be called when `init()` was called.
This allowed for a number of interesting (confusing?) different ways to use this `Mutex`, all captured in a single type.
In practice, this type was only ever used in two ways:
1. As a static variable. In this case, neither `init()` nor `destroy()` are called. The variable is never moved, and it is never used reentrantly. It is only ever locked using the `LockGuard`, never with `raw_lock`.
2. As a `Box`ed variable. In this case, both `init()` and `destroy()` are called, it will be moved and possibly used reentrantly.
No other combinations are used anywhere in `std`.
This change simplifies things by splitting this `Mutex` type into two types matching the two use cases: `StaticMutex` and `MovableMutex`.
The interface of both new types is now both safer and simpler. The first one does not call nor expose `init`/`destroy`, and the second one calls those automatically in its `new()` and `Drop` functions. Also, the locking functions of `MovableMutex` are no longer unsafe.
---
This will also make it easier to conditionally box mutexes later, by moving that decision into sys/sys_common. Some of the mutex implementations (at least those of Wasm and 'sys/unsupported') are safe to move, so wouldn't need a box. ~~(But that's blocked on #76932 for now.)~~ (See #77380.)
Overhaul const-checking diagnostics
The primary purpose of this PR was to remove `NonConstOp::STOPS_CONST_CHECKING`, which causes any additional errors found by the const-checker to be silenced. I used this flag to preserve diagnostic parity with `qualify_min_const_fn.rs`, which has since been removed.
However, simply removing the flag caused a deluge of errors in some cases, since an error would be emitted any time a local or temporary had a wrong type. To remedy this, I added an alternative system (`DiagnosticImportance`) to silence additional error messages that were likely to distract the user from the underlying issue. When an error of the highest importance occurs, all less important errors are silenced. When no error of the highest importance occurs, all less important errors are emitted after checking is complete. Following the suggestions from the important error is usually enough to fix the less important errors, so this should lead to better UX most of the time.
There's also some unrelated diagnostics improvements in this PR isolated in their own commits. Splitting them out would be possible, but a bit of a pain. This isn't as tidy as some of my other PRs, but it should *only* affect diagnostics, never whether or not something passes const-checking. Note that there are a few trivial exceptions to this, like banning `Yield` in all const-contexts, not just `const fn`.
As always, meant to be reviewed commit-by-commit.
r? `@oli-obk`
This commit improves the "try using the enum's variant" suggestion:
- Variants in suggestions would not result in more errors (e.g. use
of a struct variant is only suggested if the suggestion can
trivially construct that variant). Therefore, suggestions are only
emitted for variants that have no fields (since the suggestion
can't know what value fields would have).
- Suggestions include the syntax for constructing the variant. If a
struct or tuple variant is suggested, then it is constructed in the
suggestion - unless in pattern-matching or when arguments are already
provided.
- A help message is added which mentions the variants which are no
longer suggested.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
Remove `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_ptr]` and add `#![feature(const_fn_fn_ptr_basics)]`
`rustc_allow_const_fn_ptr` was a hack to work around the lack of an escape hatch for the "min `const fn`" checks in const-stable functions. Now that we have co-opted `allow_internal_unstable` for this purpose, we no longer need a bespoke attribute.
Now this functionality is gated under `const_fn_fn_ptr_basics` (how concise!), and `#[allow_internal_unstable(const_fn_fn_ptr_basics)]` replaces `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_ptr]`. `const_fn_fn_ptr_basics` allows function pointer types to appear in the arguments and locals of a `const fn` as well as function pointer casts to be performed inside a `const fn`. Both of these were allowed in constants and statics already. Notably, this does **not** allow users to invoke function pointers in a const context. Presumably, we will use a nicer name for that (`const_fn_ptr`?).
r? @oli-obk
diag: improve closure/generic parameter mismatch
Fixes#51154.
This PR improves the diagnostic when a type parameter is expected and a closure is found, noting that each closure has a distinct type and therefore could not always match the caller-chosen type of the parameter.
r? @estebank
