rustc: Stabilize the `#![windows_subsystem]` attribute
This commit stabilizes the `#![windows_subsystem]` attribute which is a
conservative exposure of the `/SUBSYSTEM` linker flag on Widnows platforms. This
is useful for creating applications as well as console programs.
Closes#37499
This commit stabilizes the `#![windows_subsystem]` attribute which is a
conservative exposure of the `/SUBSYSTEM` linker flag on Widnows platforms. This
is useful for creating applications as well as console programs.
Closes#37499
`match { }` now (correctly?) indicates divergence, which results in more
unreachable warnings. We also avoid fallback to `!` if there is just one
arm (see new test: `match-unresolved-one-arm.rs`).
Remove internal liblog
This commit deletes the internal liblog in favor of the implementation that
lives on crates.io. Similarly it's also setting a convention for adding crates
to the compiler. The main restriction right now is that we want compiler
implementation details to be unreachable from normal Rust code (e.g. requires a
feature), and by default everything in the sysroot is reachable via `extern
crate`.
The proposal here is to require that crates pulled in have these lines in their
`src/lib.rs`:
#![cfg_attr(rustbuild, feature(staged_api, rustc_private))]
#![cfg_attr(rustbuild, unstable(feature = "rustc_private", issue = "27812"))]
This'll mean that by default they're not using these attributes but when
compiled as part of the compiler they do a few things:
* Mark themselves as entirely unstable via the `staged_api` feature and the
`#![unstable]` attribute.
* Allow usage of other unstable crates via `feature(rustc_private)` which is
required if the crate relies on any other crates to compile (other than std).
* Point at where the token was expected instead of the last token
successfuly parsed.
* Only show `unexpected token` if the next char and the unexpected token
don't have the same span.
* Change some cfail and pfail tests to ui test.
* Don't show all possible tokens in span label if they are more than 6.
```rust
error: expected one of `.`, `;`, `?`, `}`, or an operator, found `)`
--> $DIR/token-error-correct-3.rs:29:9
|
25 | foo()
| - expected one of `.`, `;`, `?`, `}`, or an operator after this
...
29 | } else {
| ^ unexpected token
```
```rust
struct S;
impl S {
pub hello_method(&self) {
println!("Hello");
}
}
fn main() { S.hello_method(); }
```
```rust
error: can't qualify macro invocation with `pub`
--> file.rs:3:4
|
3 | pub hello_method(&self) {
| ^^^- - expected `!` here for a macro invocation
| |
| did you mean to write `fn` here for a method declaration?
|
= help: try adjusting the macro to put `pub` inside the invocation
```
This commit deletes the internal liblog in favor of the implementation that
lives on crates.io. Similarly it's also setting a convention for adding crates
to the compiler. The main restriction right now is that we want compiler
implementation details to be unreachable from normal Rust code (e.g. requires a
feature), and by default everything in the sysroot is reachable via `extern
crate`.
The proposal here is to require that crates pulled in have these lines in their
`src/lib.rs`:
#![cfg_attr(rustbuild, feature(staged_api, rustc_private))]
#![cfg_attr(rustbuild, unstable(feature = "rustc_private", issue = "27812"))]
This'll mean that by default they're not using these attributes but when
compiled as part of the compiler they do a few things:
* Mark themselves as entirely unstable via the `staged_api` feature and the
`#![unstable]` attribute.
* Allow usage of other unstable crates via `feature(rustc_private)` which is
required if the crate relies on any other crates to compile (other than std).
Add diagnostic for incorrect `pub (restriction)`
Given the following statement
```rust
pub (a) fn afn() {}
```
Provide the following diagnostic:
```rust
error: incorrect restriction in `pub`
--> file.rs:15:1
|
15 | pub (a) fn afn() {}
| ^^^
|
= help: some valid visibility restrictions are:
`pub(crate)`: visible only on the current crate
`pub(super)`: visible only in the current module's parent
`pub(in path::to::module)`: visible only on the specified path
help: to make this visible only to module `a`, add `in` before the path:
| pub (in a) fn afn() {}
```
Follow up to #40340, fix#40599, cc #32409.
Given the following statement
```rust
pub (a) fn afn() {}
```
Provide the following diagnostic:
```rust
error: incorrect restriction in `pub`
--> file.rs:15:1
|
15 | pub (a) fn afn() {}
| ^^^^^^^
|
= help: some valid visibility restrictions are:
`pub(crate)`: visible only on the current crate
`pub(super)`: visible only in the current module's parent
`pub(in path::to::module)`: visible only on the specified path
help: to make this visible only to module `a`, add `in` before the path:
| pub (in a) fn afn() {}
```
Remove cruft from old `pub(path)` syntax.
HirId has a more stable representation than NodeId, meaning that
modifications to one item don't influence (part of) the IDs within
other items. The other part is a DefIndex for which there already
is a way of stable hashing and persistence.
This commit introduces the HirId type and generates a HirId for
every NodeId during HIR lowering, but the resulting values are
not yet used anywhere, except in consistency checks.
macros: improve the `TokenStream` quoter
This PR
- renames the `TokenStream` quoter from `qquote!` to `quote!`,
- uses `$` instead of `unquote` (e.g. `let toks: TokenStream = ...; quote!([$toks])`),
- allows unquoting `Token`s as well as `TokenTree`s and `TokenStream`s (fixes#39746), and
- to preserve syntactic space, requires that `$` be followed by
- a single identifier to unquote, or
- another `$` to produce a literal `$`.
r? @nrc
Add feature gate for rvalue-static-promotion
Probably needs more tests (which ones?) and there may be other things that need to be done. Also not sure whether the version that introduces the flag is really `1.15.1`.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1414.
Updates #38865.
Whenever we parse a chain of binary operations, as long as the first
operation is `<` and the subsequent operations are either `>` or `<`,
present the following diagnostic help:
use `::<...>` instead of `<...>` if you meant to specify type arguments
This will lead to spurious recommendations on situations like
`2 < 3 < 4` but should be clear from context that the help doesn't apply
in that case.
syntax: add `ast::ItemKind::MacroDef`, simplify hygiene info
This PR
- adds a new variant `MacroDef` to `ast::ItemKind` for `macro_rules!` and eventually `macro` items,
- [breaking-change] forbids macro defs without a name (`macro_rules! { () => {} }` compiles today),
- removes `ast::MacroDef`, and
- no longer uses `Mark` and `Invocation` to identify and characterize macro definitions.
- We used to apply (at least) two `Mark`s to an expanded identifier's `SyntaxContext` -- the definition mark(s) and the expansion mark(s). We now only apply the latter.
r? @nrc
