Stabilize `ControlFlow::{is_break, is_continue}`
The type itself was stabilized in 1.55, but using it is not ergonomic without these helper functions. Stabilize them.
r? rust-lang/libs-api
Fixes 85115
This only updates unstable functions.
`array::try_map` didn't actually exist before, despite the tracking issue 79711 still being open from the old PR 79713.
Add #[must_use] to remaining core functions
I've run out of compelling reasons to group functions together across crates so I'm just going to go module-by-module. This is everything remaining from the `core` crate.
Ignored by clippy for reasons unknown:
```rust
core::alloc::Layout unsafe fn for_value_raw<T: ?Sized>(t: *const T) -> Self;
core::any const fn type_name_of_val<T: ?Sized>(_val: &T) -> &'static str;
```
Ignored by clippy because of `mut`:
```rust
str fn split_at_mut(&mut self, mid: usize) -> (&mut str, &mut str);
```
<del>
Ignored by clippy presumably because a caller might want `f` called for side effects. That seems like a bad usage of `map` to me.
```rust
core::cell::Ref<'b, T> fn map<U: ?Sized, F>(orig: Ref<'b, T>, f: F) -> Ref<'b, T>;
core::cell::Ref<'b, T> fn map_split<U: ?Sized, V: ?Sized, F>(orig: Ref<'b, T>, f: F) -> (Ref<'b, U>, Ref<'b, V>);
```
</del>
Parent issue: #89692
r? ```@joshtriplett```
Make most std::ops traits const on numeric types
This PR makes existing implementations of `std::ops` traits (`Add`, `Sub`, etc) [`impl const`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/67792) where possible.
This affects:
- All numeric primitives (`u*`, `i*`, `f*`)
- `NonZero*`
- `Wrapping`
This is under the `rustc_const_unstable` feature `const_ops`.
I will write tests once I know what can and can't be kept for the final version of this PR.
Since this is my first PR to rustc (and hopefully one of many), please give me feedback on how to better handle the PR process wherever possible. Thanks
[Zulip discussion](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Const.20std.3A.3Aops.20traits.20PR)
1. The existing example compiles on its own, but any usage fails
to be monomorphised and so doesn't compile. Fix that by using
a mutable reference as an input argument.
2. Added an example usage of `traverse_inorder` showing how we
can terminate the traversal early.
Fixes#90063
Fix and extent ControlFlow `traverse_inorder` example
1. The existing example compiles on its own, but any usage fails to be monomorphised and so doesn't compile. Fix that by using Fn trait instead of FnMut.
2. Added an example usage of `traverse_inorder` showing how we can terminate the traversal early.
Fixes#90063
Add a map method to Bound
Add a map method to std::ops::range::Bound, patterned off of the method
of the same name on Option.
Have left off creating a tracking issue initially, but as soon as I get the go-ahead from a reviewer I'll make that right away 😄
Demote `ControlFlow::{from|into}_try` to `pub(crate)`
They have mediocre names and non-obvious semantics, so personally I don't think they're worth trying to stabilize, and thus might as well just be internal (they're used for convenience in iterator adapters), not something shown in the rustdocs.
I don't think anyone actually wanted to use them outside `core` -- they just got made public-but-unstable along with the whole type in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/76204 that promoted `LoopState` from an internal type to the exposed `ControlFlow` type.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/75744, the tracking issue they mention.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/85608, the PR where I'm proposing stabilizing the type.
Extend `rustc_on_implemented` to improve more `?` error messages
`_Self` could match the generic definition; this adds that functionality for matching the generic definition of type parameters too.
Your advice welcome on the wording of all these messages, and which things belong in the message/label/note.
r? `@estebank`
Add the `try_trait_v2` library basics
No compiler changes as part of this -- just new unstable traits and impls thereof.
The goal here is to add the things that aren't going to break anything, to keep the feature implementation simpler in the next PR.
(Draft since the FCP won't end until Saturday, but I was feeling optimistic today -- and had forgotten that FCP was 10 days, not 7 days.)
