changelog: [`declare_interior_mutable_const`,
`borrow_interior_mutable_const`]: resolve `<T as Trait>::AssocT`
projections
---
This came up during https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/130543 where
we have `<T as AtomicPrimitive>::Assoc = AtomicT` instead of just
`AtomicT` and clippy failed to resolve that properly.
This really needs a review, because
- I don't know if `try_normalize_erasing_regions` is the right thing to
call here.
- I'm not sure if I peel off the correct amount of `ValTree::Branch`
layers (I think I do).
Also, shouldn't this lint's infrastructure rely on `Freeze` trait
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121675) instead of hardcoding
a list of known-to-be-interior-mutable types?
---
Previously filed this in the main rust repo
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136369), was asked to do it here
instead
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136369#issuecomment-2628527774).
When looking for `Default` impls that could be derived, we look at the
body of their `fn default()` and if it is an fn call or literal we check
if they are equivalent to what `#[derive(Default)]` would have used.
Now, when checking those fn calls in the `fn default()` body, we also
compare against the corresponding type's `Default::default` body to see
if our call is equivalent to that one.
For example, given
```rust
struct S;
impl S {
fn new() -> S { S }
}
impl Default for S {
fn default() -> S { S::new() }
}
```
`<S as Default>::default()` and `S::new()` are considered equivalent.
Given that, if the user also writes
```rust
struct R {
s: S,
}
impl Default for R {
fn default() -> R {
R { s: S::new() }
}
}
```
the `derivable_impls` lint will now trigger.
fixes: #12659
[`manual_map`] and [`manual_filter`] shares the same check logic, but
this issue doesn't seems like it could affect `manual_filter` (?)
---
changelog: make [`manual_map`] ignore types that contain `dyn`
By assuming that a recursive type is normalizable within the deeper
calls to `is_normalizable_helper()`, more cases can be handled by this
function.
In order to fix stack overflows, a recursion limit has also been added
for recursive generic type instantiations.
Fix#9798Fix#10508Fix#11915
changelog: [`large_enum_variant`]: more precise detection of variants
with large size differences
- `reindent_multiline()` always returns the result of
`reindent_multiline_inner()` which returns a `String`. Make
`reindent_multiline()` return a `String` as well, instead of a
systematically owned `Cow<'_, str>`.
- There is no reason for `reindent_multiline()` to force a caller to
build a `Cow<'_, str>` instead of passing a `&str` directly, especially
considering that a `String` will always be returned.
Also, both the input parameter and return value (of type `Cow<'_, str>`)
shared the same (elided) lifetime for no reason: this worked only
because the result was always the `Cow::Owned` variant which is
compatible with any lifetime.
As a consequence, the signature changes from:
```rust
fn reindent_multiline(s: Cow<'_, str>, …) -> Cow<'_, str> { … }
```
to
```rust
fn reindent_multiline(s: &str, …) -> String { … }
```
changelog: none
Labeled blocks cannot be used as-is in the "then" or "else" part of an
`if` expression. They must be enclosed in an anonymous block.
Fix#14099
changelog: [`match_bool`]: fix suggestion when the rewritten block has a
label
#[contracts::requires(...)] + #[contracts::ensures(...)]
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/128044
Updated contract support: attribute syntax for preconditions and postconditions, implemented via a series of desugarings that culminates in:
1. a compile-time flag (`-Z contract-checks`) that, similar to `-Z ub-checks`, attempts to ensure that the decision of enabling/disabling contract checks is delayed until the end user program is compiled,
2. invocations of lang-items that handle invoking the precondition, building a checker for the post-condition, and invoking that post-condition checker at the return sites for the function, and
3. intrinsics for the actual evaluation of pre- and post-condition predicates that third-party verification tools can intercept and reinterpret for their own purposes (e.g. creating shims of behavior that abstract away the function body and replace it solely with the pre- and post-conditions).
Known issues:
* My original intent, as described in the MCP (https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/759) was to have a rustc-prefixed attribute namespace (like rustc_contracts::requires). But I could not get things working when I tried to do rewriting via a rustc-prefixed builtin attribute-macro. So for now it is called `contracts::requires`.
* Our attribute macro machinery does not provide direct support for attribute arguments that are parsed like rust expressions. I spent some time trying to add that (e.g. something that would parse the attribute arguments as an AST while treating the remainder of the items as a token-tree), but its too big a lift for me to undertake. So instead I hacked in something approximating that goal, by semi-trivially desugaring the token-tree attribute contents into internal AST constucts. This may be too fragile for the long-term.
* (In particular, it *definitely* breaks when you try to add a contract to a function like this: `fn foo1(x: i32) -> S<{ 23 }> { ... }`, because its token-tree based search for where to inject the internal AST constructs cannot immediately see that the `{ 23 }` is within a generics list. I think we can live for this for the short-term, i.e. land the work, and continue working on it while in parallel adding a new attribute variant that takes a token-tree attribute alongside an AST annotation, which would completely resolve the issue here.)
* the *intent* of `-Z contract-checks` is that it behaves like `-Z ub-checks`, in that we do not prematurely commit to including or excluding the contract evaluation in upstream crates (most notably, `core` and `std`). But the current test suite does not actually *check* that this is the case. Ideally the test suite would be extended with a multi-crate test that explores the matrix of enabling/disabling contracts on both the upstream lib and final ("leaf") bin crates.
- `reindent_multiline()` always returns the result of
`reindent_multiline_inner()` which returns a `String`. Make
`reindent_multiline()` return a `String` as well, instead of a
systematically owned `Cow<'_, str>`.
- There is no reason for `reindent_multiline()` to force a caller to
build a `Cow<'_, str>` instead of passing a `&str` directly,
especially considering that a `String` will always be returned.
Also, both the input parameter and return value (of type `Cow<'_, str>`)
shared the same (elided) lifetime for no reason: this worked only because
the result was always the `Cow::Owned` variant which is compatible with
any lifetime.
As a consequence, the signature changes from:
```rust
fn reindent_multiline(s: Cow<'_, str>, …) -> Cow<'_, str> { … }
```
to
```rust
fn reindent_multiline(s: &str, …) -> String { … }
```
Hey folks. It's been a while since I added the `as_slice` method to
`Option`, and I totally forgot about a lint to suggest it. Well, I had
some time around Christmas, so here it is now.
---
changelog: add [`manual_option_as_slice`] lint
includes post-developed commit: do not suggest internal-only keywords as corrections to parse failures.
includes post-developed commit: removed tabs that creeped in into rustfmt tool source code.
includes post-developed commit, placating rustfmt self dogfooding.
includes post-developed commit: add backquotes to prevent markdown checking from trying to treat an attr as a markdown hyperlink/
includes post-developed commit: fix lowering to keep contracts from being erroneously inherited by nested bodies (like closures).
Rebase Conflicts:
- compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/diagnostics.rs
- compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/item.rs
- compiler/rustc_span/src/hygiene.rs
Remove contracts keywords from diagnostic messages
Do not consider child bound assumptions for rigid alias
r? lcnr
See first commit for the important details. For second commit, I also stacked a somewhat opinionated name change, though I can separate that if needed.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/149
Get rid of `mir::Const::from_ty_const`
This function is strange, because it turns valtrees into `mir::Const::Value`, but the rest of the const variants stay as type system consts.
All of the callsites except for one in `instsimplify` (array length simplification of `ptr_metadata` call) just go through the valtree arm of the function, so it's easier to just create a `mir::Const` directly for those.
For the instsimplify case, if we have a type system const we should *keep* having a type system const, rather than turning it into a `mir::Const::Value`; it doesn't really matter in practice, though, bc `usize` has no padding, but it feels more principled.
This lint detects and removes the unnecessary semicolon after a `match`
or `if` statement returning `()`. It seems to be quite a common
"mistake", given the number of hits (88) we had in the Clippy sources
themselves.
The lint doesn't bother about loops, as `rustfmt` already removes the
extra semicolon. It doesn't handle blocks either, as an extra block
level, followed or not by a semicolon, is likely intentional.
I propose to put the lint in `pedantic`, as putting it in `style` seems
quite hazardous given the number of hits.
Note: there exists a `redundant-semicolon` lint in the compiler, but it
is an early lint and cannot check that the expression evaluates to `()`,
so it ignores the cases we're handling here.
----
changelog: [`unnecessary_semicolon`]: new lint
By assuming that a recursive type is normalizable within the deeper
calls to `is_normalizable_helper()`, more cases can be handled by this
function.
In order to fix stack overflows, a recursion limit has also been added
for recursive generic type instantiations.
