Inline CSS background images directly into the CSS
A nice advantage of this is that it removes a few entries in the list of static files.
r? ``@notriddle``
Migrate last part of CSS themes to CSS variables
No changes in the output. This is already tested in `tests/rustdoc-gui/search-tab.goml` so no need to add a GUI test.
r? `@notriddle`
Keep all theme-updating logic together
Prior to this PR, if the page is restored from the browser bfcache¹, we call `switchToSavedTheme`. But `switchToSavedTheme` never looks at the `use-system-theme` preference. Further, if it can't find a saved theme, it will fall back to the default of "light".
For a user with cookies disabled² whose preferred color scheme is dark, this means the theme will wobble back and forth between dark and light. The sequence that occurs is,
1. The page is loaded. During a page load, we consult `use-system-theme`: as cookies are disabled, this preference is unset. The default is true.
Because the default is true, we look at the preferred color scheme: for our example user, that's "dark". **The page theme is set to dark.** We'll attempt to store these preferences in localStorage, but fail due to cookies being disabled.
2. The user navigates through the docs. Subsequent page loads happen, and the same process in step 1 recurs. Previous pages are (potentially) put into the bfcache.
3. The user navigates backwards/forwards, causing a page in bfcache to be pulled out of cache. The `pageShow` event handler is triggered. However, this calls `switchToSavedTheme`: this doesn't consider the system theme, as noted above. Instead, it only looks for a saved theme. However, with cookies disabled, there is none. It defaults to light. **The page theme is set to light!** The user wonders why the dark theme is lost.
There are effectively two functions trying to determine and apply the correct theme: `updateSystemTheme` and `switchToSavedTheme`. Thus, we merge them into just one: `updateTheme`. This function contains all the logic for determining the correct theme, and is called in all circumstances where we need to set the theme:
* The initial page load
* If the browser preferred color scheme (i.e., light/dark mode) is changed
* If the page is restored from bfcache
* If the user updates the theme preferences (i.e., in `settings.js`)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94250.
¹bfcache: https://web.dev/bfcache/ The bfcache is used to sleep a page, if the user navigates away from it, and to restore it from cache if the user returns to it.
²Note that the browser preference that enables/disables cookies really controls many forms of storage. The same preference thus also affects localStorage. (This is so a normal browser user doesn't need to understand the distinction between "cookies" and "localStorage".)
Prior to this PR, if the page is restored from the browser bfcache¹, we
call `switchToSavedTheme`. But `switchToSavedTheme` never looks at the
`use-system-theme` preference. Further, if it can't find a saved theme,
it will fall back to the default of "light".
For a user with cookies disabled² whose preferred color scheme is dark,
this means the theme will wobble back and forth between dark and light.
The sequence that occurs is,
1. The page is loaded. During a page load, we consult
`use-system-theme`: as cookies are disabled, this preference is
unset. The default is true.
Because the default is true, we look at the preferred color scheme:
for our example user, that's "dark". **The page theme is set to
dark.** We'll attempt to store these preferences in localStorage, but
fail due to cookies being disabled.
2. The user navigates through the docs. Subsequent page loads happen,
and the same process in step 1 recurs. Previous pages are
(potentially) put into the bfcache.
3. The user navigates backwards/forwards, causing a page in bfcache to
be pulled out of cache. The `pageShow` event handler is triggered.
However, this calls `switchToSavedTheme`: this doesn't consider the
system theme, as noted above. Instead, it only looks for a saved
theme. However, with cookies disabled, there is none. It defaults to
light. **The page theme is set to light!** The user wonders why the
dark theme is lost.
There are effectively two functions trying to determine and apply the
correct theme: `updateSystemTheme` and `switchToSavedTheme`. Thus, we
merge them into just one: `updateTheme`. This function contains all the
logic for determining the correct theme, and is called in all
circumstances where we need to set the theme:
* The initial page load
* If the browser preferred color scheme (i.e., light/dark mode) is
changed
* If the page is restored from bfcache
* If the user updates the theme preferences (i.e., in `settings.js`)
Fixes#94250.
¹bfcache: https://web.dev/bfcache/ The bfcache is used to sleep a page,
if the user navigates away from it, and to restore it from cache if the
user returns to it.
²Note that the browser preference that enables/disables cookies really
controls many forms of storage. The same preference thus also affects
localStorage. (This is so a normal browser user doesn't need to
understand the distinction between "cookies" and "localStorage".)
* Changes the class names so that they all start with `setting-`.
That should make it harder to accidentally use a setting class outside
the settings popover, where loading the CSS might accidentally change
the styles of something unrelated.
* Get rid of an unnecessary wrapper DIV around the radio button line.
* Simplify CSS selectors by making the DOM easier and more intuitive
to target.
The comment says that it is called from main.js, but there don't seem to
be any references to it in main.js.
A quick ripgrep says there are no references in all of librustdoc.
rustdoc: remove redundant CSS rule `#settings .setting-line`
Since the current version of settings.js always nests things below a div with ID `settings`, this rule always overrode the one above.
rustdoc: simplify JS search routine by not messing with lev distance
Since the sorting function accounts for an `index` field, there's not much reason to also be applying changes to the levenshtein distance. Instead, we can just not treat `lev` as a filter if there's already a non-sentinel value for `index`.
<details>
This change gives slightly more weight to the index and path part, as search criteria, than it used to. This changes some of the test cases, but not in any obviously-"worse" way, and, in particular, substring matches are a bigger deal than levenshtein distances (we're assuming that a typo is less likely than someone just not typing the entire name).
The biggest change is the addition of a `path_lev` field to result items. It's always zero if the search query has no parent path part and for type queries, making the check in the `sortResults` function a no-op. When it's present, it is used to implement different precedence for the parent path and the tail.
Consider the query `hashset::insert`, a test case [that already exists and can be found here](5c6a1681a9/src/test/rustdoc-js-std/path-ordering.js). We want the ordering shown in the test case:
```
{ 'path': 'std::collections::hash_set::HashSet', 'name': 'insert' },
{ 'path': 'std::collections::hash_set::HashSet', 'name': 'get_or_insert' },
{ 'path': 'std::collections::hash_set::HashSet', 'name': 'get_or_insert_with' },
{ 'path': 'std::collections::hash_set::HashSet', 'name': 'get_or_insert_owned' },
{ 'path': 'std::collections::hash_map::HashMap', 'name': 'insert' },
```
We do not want this ordering, which is the ordering that would occur if substring position took priority over `path_lev`:
```
{ 'path': 'std::collections::hash_set::HashSet', 'name': 'insert' },
{ 'path': 'std::collections::hash_map::HashMap', 'name': 'insert' }, // BAD
{ 'path': 'std::collections::hash_set::HashSet', 'name': 'get_or_insert' },
{ 'path': 'std::collections::hash_set::HashSet', 'name': 'get_or_insert_with' },
{ 'path': 'std::collections::hash_set::HashSet', 'name': 'get_or_insert_owned' },
```
We also do not want `HashSet::iter` to appear before `HashMap::insert`, which is what would happen if `path_lev` took priority over the appearance of any substring match. This is why the `sortResults` function has `path_lev` sandwiched between a `index < 0` check and a `index` comparison check:
```
{ 'path': 'std::collections::hash_set::HashSet', 'name': 'insert' },
{ 'path': 'std::collections::hash_set::HashSet', 'name': 'get_or_insert' },
{ 'path': 'std::collections::hash_set::HashSet', 'name': 'get_or_insert_with' },
{ 'path': 'std::collections::hash_set::HashSet', 'name': 'get_or_insert_owned' },
{ 'path': 'std::collections::hash_set::HashSet', 'name': 'iter' }, // BAD
{ 'path': 'std::collections::hash_map::HashMap', 'name': 'insert' },
```
The old code implemented a similar feature by manipulating the `lev` member based on whether a substring match was found and averaging in the path distance (`item.lev = name_lev + path_lev / 10`), so the path lev wound up acting like a tie breaker, but it gives slightly different results for `Vec::new`, [changing the test case](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/105796/files#diff-b346e2ef72a407915f438063c8c2c04f7a621df98923d441b41c0312211a5b21) because of the slight changes to ordering priority.
</details>
Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103710#issuecomment-1296894296
Previews:
* https://notriddle.com/notriddle-rustdoc-demos/rustdoc-search-stop-doing-demerits/std/index.html
* https://notriddle.com/notriddle-rustdoc-demos/rustdoc-search-stop-doing-demerits-compiler/index.html
This prevents some strange blur-event-related bugs with the "?" command
by ensuring that the focus remains in the same spot when the settings
area closes.
Since the sorting function accounts for an `index` field, there's not much
reason to also be applying changes to the levenshtein distance. Instead,
we can just not treat `lev` as a filter if there's already a non-sentinel
value for `index`.
This change gives slightly more weight to the index and path part, as
search criteria, than it used to. This changes some of the test cases,
but not in any obviously-"worse" way, and, in particular, substring matches
are a bigger deal than levenshtein distances (we're assuming that a typo
is less likely than someone just not typing the entire name).
Based on
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103710#issuecomment-1296894296
rustdoc: remove `docblock` class from notable trait popover
This commit builds on b72de9be74, which removes the `docblock` class from the All Items page, and 9457380ac9, which removes the `docblock` class from the item decl.
Fixes#92974
