Refactorings to borrowck region diagnostic reporting
This PR is a followup to #66886 and #67404
EDIT: updated
In this PR: Clean up how errors are collected from NLL: introduce `borrow_check::diagnostics::RegionErrors` to collect errors. This is later passed to `MirBorrowckCtx::report_region_errors` after the `MirBorrowckCtx` is created. This will allow us to refactor away some of the extra context structs floating around (but we don't do it in this PR). `borrow_check::region_infer` is now mostly free of diagnostic generating code. The signatures of most of the functions in `region_infer` lose somewhere between 4 and 7 arguments :)
Left for future (feedback appreciated):
- Merge `ErrorRegionCtx` with `MirBorrowckCtx`, as suggested by @matthewjasper in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/66886#issuecomment-559949499
- Maybe move the contents of `borrow_check::nll` into `borrow_check` and remove the `nll` submodule altogether.
- Find a way to make `borrow_check::diagnostics::region_errors` less of a strange appendage to `RegionInferenceContext`. I'm not really sure how to do this yet. Ideas welcome.
Add regression tests for fixed ICEs
Closes#61747 (fixed from 1.41.0-nightly (4007d4ef2 2019-12-01))
Closes#66205 (fixed from 1.41.0-nightly (4007d4ef2 2019-12-01))
Closes#66270 (fixed by #66246)
Closes#67424 (fixed by #67160)
Also picking a minor nit up from #67071 with 101dd7bad9
r? @Centril
Ensure that evaluating or validating a constant never reads from a static
r? @RalfJung
as per https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/66302#issuecomment-554663387
This does not yet address the fact that evaluation of a constant can read from a static (under unleash-miri)
Initial implementation of `#![feature(bindings_after_at)]`
Following up on #16053, under the gate `#![feature(bindings_after_at)]`, `x @ Some(y)` is allowed subject to restrictions necessary for soundness.
The implementation and test suite should be fairly complete now.
One aspect that is not covered is the interaction with nested `#![feature(or_patterns)]`.
This is not possible to test at the moment in a good way because that feature has not progressed sufficiently and has fatal errors in MIR building. We should make sure to add such tests before we stabilize both features (but shipping one of them is fine).
r? @pnkfelix
cc @nikomatsakis @matthewjasper @pcwalton
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65490
Improve diagnostics for invalid assignment
- Improve wording and span information for invalid assignment diagnostics.
- Link to https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/372 when it appears the user is trying a destructuring assignment.
- Make the equality constraint in `where` clauses error consistent with the invalid assignment error.
Remove mem::uninitalized from tests
This purges uses of uninitialized where possible from test cases. Some
are merely moved over to the equally bad pattern of
MaybeUninit::uninit().assume_init() but with an annotation that this is
"the best we can do".
Fixes#62397
This purges uses of uninitialized where possible from test cases. Some
are merely moved over to the equally bad pattern of
MaybeUninit::uninit().assume_init() but with an annotation that this is
"the best we can do".
Require issue = "none" over issue = "0" in unstable attributes
These changes make the use of `issue = "none"` required in unstable attributes throughout the compiler.
Notes:
- #66299 is now in beta so `issue = "none"` is accepted.
- The `tidy` tool now fails on `issue = "0"`.
- Tests that used `issue = "0"` were changed to use `issue = "none"`, except for _one_ that asserts `issue = "0"` can still be used.
- The compiler still allows `issue = "0"` because some submodules require it, this could be disallowed once these are updated.
Resolves#41260
r? @varkor
Refactor type & bounds parsing thoroughly
PR is based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/67131 with first one from this PR being ` extract parse_ty_tuple_or_parens`.
Also fixes#67146.
r? @estebank
Revamp `// run-fail` wrt. `--pass` & support `// build-fail` & `// check-fail`
Revamp how `// run-fail` tests work internally by having a separate `FailMode` that does not interfere with `PassMode`. In particular, `--pass check` will now have no effect on `// *-fail` tests. Moreover, new test annotations `// check-fail` (the default) and `// build-fail` are added. The latter is useful to distinguish post-monomorphization failures from pre-monomorphization failures as seen throughout the PR. Finally, ensure that non-`Ui` tests do not listen to `--pass check` such that the flag can be used with e.g. `./x.py test --pass check` directly.
Fixes#66929.
Fixes#67128.
r? @petrochenkov
cc @RalfJung @ninjasource
