Currently, the def span of a funtion encompasses the entire function
signature and body. However, this is usually unnecessarily verbose - when we are
pointing at an entire function in a diagnostic, we almost always want to
point at the signature. The actual contents of the body tends to be
irrelevant to the diagnostic we are emitting, and just takes up
additional screen space.
This commit changes the `def_span` of all function items (freestanding
functions, `impl`-block methods, and `trait`-block methods) to be the
span of the signature. For example, the function
```rust
pub fn foo<T>(val: T) -> T { val }
```
now has a `def_span` corresponding to `pub fn foo<T>(val: T) -> T`
(everything before the opening curly brace).
Trait methods without a body have a `def_span` which includes the
trailing semicolon. For example:
```rust
trait Foo {
fn bar();
}```
the function definition `Foo::bar` has a `def_span` of `fn bar();`
This makes our diagnostic output much shorter, and emphasizes
information that is relevant to whatever diagnostic we are reporting.
We continue to use the full span (including the body) in a few of
places:
* MIR building uses the full span when building source scopes.
* 'Outlives suggestions' use the full span to sort the diagnostics being
emitted.
* The `#[rustc_on_unimplemented(enclosing_scope="in this scope")]`
attribute points the entire scope body.
* The 'unconditional recursion' lint uses the full span to show
additional context for the recursive call.
All of these cases work only with local items, so we don't need to
add anything extra to crate metadata.
Making ICEs and test them in incremental
This adds:
- A way to make the compiler ICE
- A way to check for ICE in `cfail` tests with `should-ice`
- A regression test for issue #65401
I am not sure the attribute added `should-ice` is the best for this job
(Or more precisely, a pair of such traits: one for `derive(PartialEq)` and one
for `derive(Eq)`.)
((The addition of the second marker trait, `StructuralEq`, is largely a hack to
work-around `fn (&T)` not implementing `PartialEq` and `Eq`; see also issue
rust-lang/rust#46989; otherwise I would just check if `Eq` is implemented.))
Note: this does not use trait fulfillment error-reporting machinery; it just
uses the trait system to determine if the ADT was tagged or not. (Nonetheless, I
have kept an `on_unimplemented` message on the new trait for structural_match
check, even though it is currently not used.)
Note also: this does *not* resolve the ICE from rust-lang/rust#65466, as noted
in a comment added in this commit. Further work is necessary to resolve that and
other problems with the structural match checking, especially to do so without
breaking stable code (adapted from test fn-ptr-is-structurally-matchable.rs):
```rust
fn r_sm_to(_: &SM) {}
fn main() {
const CFN6: Wrap<fn(&SM)> = Wrap(r_sm_to);
let input: Wrap<fn(&SM)> = Wrap(r_sm_to);
match Wrap(input) {
Wrap(CFN6) => {}
Wrap(_) => {}
};
}
```
where we would hit a problem with the strategy of unconditionally checking for
`PartialEq` because the type `for <'a> fn(&'a SM)` does not currently even
*implement* `PartialEq`.
----
added review feedback:
* use an or-pattern
* eschew `return` when tail position will do.
* don't need fresh_expansion; just add `structural_match` to appropriate `allow_internal_unstable` attributes.
also fixed example in doc comment so that it actually compiles.
This is a way to address the regression aspect of rust-lang/rust#62614 in the
short term without actually fixing the bug. (My thinking is that the bug that
this lint detects has gone undetected for this long, it can wait a bit longer
until I or someone else has a chance to put in a proper fix that accounts for
rust-lang/rust#62614.)
use visitor for #[structural_match] check
This changes the code so that we recur down the structure of a type of a const (rather than just inspecting at a shallow one or two levels) when we are looking to see if it has an ADT that did not derive `PartialEq` and `Eq`.
Fix#61188Fix#62307
Cc #62336
